Antimicrobial residual effects of irrigation regimens with maleic acid in infected root canals.

BACKGROUND: The success of endodontic treatment depends largely on the control of microorganisms present in infected root canals. The aim of this study was to determine the residual antimicrobial activity of several final irrigation protocols with 7% maleic acid (MA) alone and combined with chlorhexidine (CHX), cetrimide (CTR) or both, in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Biofilms of E. faecalis were grown in uniradicular roots for 4 weeks. A total of 72 specimens were divided into 5 experimental groups according to the final irrigation regime used: Group 1: 2.5% NaOCl; Group 2: 7% MA; Group 3: 7% MA + 0.2% CTR; Group 4: 7% MA + 2% CHX; Group 5: 7% MA + 0.2% CTR + 2% CHX; and CONTROL GROUP: 0.9% saline solution. Twelve roots (2/group) that were instrumented and not infected served as negative or sterility controls. The proportion of ungrown samples over 60 days was evaluated using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differences among groups were tested using the log-rank test (p< 0.05). RESULTS: The association of MA with CHX and CHX + CTR as final irrigating solutions showed the best results, 5 and 4 samples out of 12, respectively, and without differences between them (p = 0.928), followed by 7% MA + 0.2% CTR with 7 out of 12. The 7% MA (11/12) group showed significant differences with respect to the groups in which MA was combined with CHX (p < 0.005) and CHX + CTR (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Final irrigating solutions of 7% MA combined with 2% CHX or 2% CHX + 0.2% CTR were found to effectively improve antimicrobial root canal disinfection.

An in vitro evaluation of two dentine adhesive systems to seal the pulpchamber using a glucose penetration model

Objectives: To evaluate the sealing capability of Cavit™ G with or without Clearfil™ S3 Bond and Prime & BondNT placed in the pulp chamber.Study Design: Forty single rooted premolars, extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons, with intact coronalsurface and mature apices, were standardized to a length of 15 mm. The teeth were instrumented, filled witha gutta-percha master cone and divided into three groups to obturate the pulp chambers: Cavit™ G; Clearfil™S3 Bond plus Cavit™ G and Prime & Bond® NT plus Cavit™ G. A glucose leakage model was used for evaluatingthe coronal microleakage. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences in the means of theglucose leakage.Results: An increase in glucose penetration was observed during the first week in groups Cavit™ G and Cavit™G+PBNT. The glucose penetration values of all groups were similar at 30 and 45 days, and there were no significantdifferences among them in both time periods (p=0.736 and p=0.581, respectively).Conclusions: The adhesive systems did not improve the capability of Cavit™ G to seal the pulp chamber overtime (AU)

An in vitro evaluation of two dentine adhesive systems to seal the pulp chamber using a glucose penetration model.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sealing capability of Cavit™ G with or without Clearfil™ S3 Bond and Prime & Bond NT placed in the pulp chamber. STUDY DESIGN: Forty single rooted premolars, extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons, with intact coronal surface and mature apices, were standardized to a length of 15 mm. The teeth were instrumented, filled with a gutta-percha master cone and divided into three groups to obturate the pulp chambers: Cavit™ G; Clearfil™ S3 Bond plus Cavit™ G and Prime & Bond® NT plus Cavit™ G. A glucose leakage model was used for evaluating the coronal microleakage. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences in the means of the glucose leakage. RESULTS: An increase in glucose penetration was observed during the first week in groups Cavit™ G and Cavit™ G+PBNT. The glucose penetration values of all groups were similar at 30 and 45 days, and there were no significant differences among them in both time periods (p=0.736 and p=0.581, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The adhesive systems did not improve the capability of Cavit™ G to seal the pulp chamber over time.

Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Cavit TM G, ProRoot TM MTA and Tetric® EvoFlow as intraorifice barriers to prevent coronal microleakage in root canal treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-two human single rooted teeth were divided randomly in three experimental groups of 10 specimens each and two control groups. The experimental groups were prepared with hand instrumentation and cold lateral condensed technique of the gutta-percha. Four millimetres of coronal gutta-percha were removed and replaced by one of the following filling materials: Cavit TM G, Tetric® EvoFlow or ProRoot TM MTA. In the experimental groups, leakage was measured by the concentration of leaked glucose in the apical reservoir at 1, 7, 30, and 45 days, using the enzymatic glucose oxidase method. Data were analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests at α=0.05. RESULTS: The glucose penetration results of three experimental groups increased gradually over time. No significant differences were found among groups at 24 hours and 1 week. At thirty and forty-five days, Cavit TM and Tetric® EvoFlow values were significantly different (p=0.007 and p=0.023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The sealing ability of the Cavit TM G, ProRoot TM MTA and Tetric® EvoFlow used as intraorifice materials tends to be similar over time.