Non-Heart-Beating Donor Kidney Transplantation Survival Is Similar to Donation After Brain Death: Comparative Study With Controls in a Regional Program.

Non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) are an increasing source of organs for kidney transplantation (KT) compared with donation after brain death (DBD), but the results in each regional transplantation program require local analysis. We compared 164 KT from NHBD (83 Maastrich type II A-B [T2] and 81 type III [T3]) with 328 DBD controls. NHBD kidneys were implanted with less cold ischemia, mean time on renal replacement therapy for NHBD recipients before transplantation was less too, and a higher proportion of thymoglobulin was also used. Besides NHBD-T2 more frequently showing the A group and patients being younger (48.9 ± 11 vs DBD 55.2 ± 15 years old; P < .001), there was a lower proportion of retransplant recipients and HLA sensitization; HLA-DR compatibility was slightly worse. Proportion of nonfunctioning allograft and necessity of dialysis after transplantation for NHBD were 4.9 and 68.3% versus DBD 4.3 and 26.9% (P < .001); renal function after a year was significantly less in NHBD (serum creatinine 1.79 ± 0.9 mg/dL vs 1.46 ± 0.5 in DBD; P < .001). NHBD recipient survival rates were 96% and 96% for the 1st and 3rd years, respectively, versus 96% and 94% for DBD, respectively (not significant [NS]). Graft survival rates censored by death were 91% and 89% (1st and 3rd years, respectively) versus 95% and 94% for DBD, respectively (NS). We did not find significant differences about survival between NHBD-T2 and T3. In the multivariable survival study (Cox, covariables with statistical significance demonstrated previously in our region), NHBD is not a prognosis factor for recipient or graft survival. Regarding current criteria for choosing donors and the graft allocation applied in Andalusia, short-term survival for NHBD transplantation is similar to DBD. Renal function in the short term is slightly worse, which is why it is important to monitor results over a long term, especially those from NHBD-T2.

Hepatitis C Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Problem on the Path to Eradication.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) still has significant prevalence in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and is related to poor recipient and graft survival. New direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are leading to a radical change in the problem. METHODS: We studied HCV prevalence at the time of transplantation and in follow-up patients, the way cases are handled, and the results of DAA. RESULTS: A total of 2,001 KT had been performed in our center since 1978. Pre- or post-transplantation HCV serology was present in 1,880 cases and was positive in 13.4%. A total of 1,195 transplant recipients were still being monitored by us, with only 60 (5%) HCV+ and 45 (3.6%) RNA+ cases. Of these 45 HCV+/RNA+, 25 had been or were being treated, 7 were about to begin treatment, 1 was awaiting new DAA treatment owing to low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 3 were being evaluated, 2 had been excluded owing to high comorbidity, 2 refused to be treated, 2 needed to return to hemodialysis, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Except 1 case where Viekira Pak was used because of low GFR, all cases included sofosbuvir as the main drug associated with either ledipasvir (70%) or daclatasvir (25%). Ribavirin was added as coadjuvant in 35% of cases. Twenty-one patients had completed treatment (84%). Two patients had to interrupt DAA therapy (8%), one because of hepatotoxicity and the other as a result of a liver transplantation. In every case, the graft maintained function and negativization of viral replication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Side effects have been low, anemia related to ribavirin being the main one. Just one case needed to be interrupted at the 7th week of DAA therapy due to hepatotoxicity. It has frequently been necessary to adjust immunosuppression treatment with the use of higher doses of tacrolimus.

Hepatitis C Treatment With Direct-Acting Antivirals in Kidney Transplant: Preliminary Results From a Multicenter Study.

Hepatitis C (HC) is a very relevant negative prognosis factor for graft and transplant recipient survival. New direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) allow us to solve this problem in an effective way. It is crucial to understand their real impact in our daily practice. We analyzed treatment results with DAA, free of interferon, in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from 15 Spanish hospitals (Grupo Español de Actualización en Trasplante), regarding effectiveness, tolerance, and impact on immunosuppression, renal function-proteinuria, and diabetes. One hundred nineteen KTRs were included (9 combined liver-kidney transplants). The main DAA used was sofobusvir (91%) combined with ledipasvir (55%), simeprevir (14%), or daclatasvir (13%); in 9 cases (7%), a paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir-dasabuvir combination (3D) was used; Ribavirin was used as a coadjuvant in 18%. Side effects were limited (23.5%) and without relevance in general, except in 7 patients for whom we needed to interrupt the treatment due to neurotoxicity (1) caused by drug interaction (3D and tacrolimus) or anemia (3) by Ribavirin or others. Ninety-four patients had completed the treatment when data were analyzed: virological response was seen in 97.8% % of cases. Liver function analysis improved: 84% normal versus 21% before starting the treatment (P < .001). Renal function and proteinuria did not change. Tacrolimus level at the end of DAA-treatment was significantly lower with respect to the beginning (5.8 ± 2.1 ng/mL vs. 7.4 ± 1.8 ng/mL, P = .03), despite a slight increase in the dose (2.6 mg/d vs. 2.3 mg/d, P = .17). DAA are highly effective in the treatment of hepatitis C in KTRs with good tolerance in general, making it possible to solve the problem and have a good chance to improve the prognosis in our transplantation patients. The use of these therapies in KTRs requires special control and coordination with digestive professionals, especially if 3D or Ribavirin is used.

Survival of Kidney Allograft of Donors after Circulatory Death Is Similar to Donors after Brain Death: Experience in a Regional Program.

BACKGROUND: Donors after circulatory death (DCD) are an increasingly crucial source of organs to maintain deceased donor kidney transplant activity when faced with a standstill in donors after brain death (DBD). We analyzed the influence on graft survival since the use of DCD organs was implemented in Andalusia (2010-2014). METHODS: We compared 164 kidney transplants from DCD (83 Maastricht type II and 81 type III) and 1488 DBD transplants in recipients over the age of 18, excluding combined transplants. RESULTS: DCD were more frequently men from the A blood group who were younger (48.9 ± 11 vs 55.2 ± 15 years old for DBD, P < .001). Kidneys from DCD were implanted in younger recipients (51.2 ± 11 vs 53.5 ± 13 years old for DBD, P = .03), more frequently in men from blood group A who spent less time in renal replacement therapy (39.8 vs 51.5 months), in a lower proportion of immunized recipients and re-transplant patients, and had worse HLA-DR compatibility. DCD presented a proportion of primary nonfunctional allografts and an initial need for dialysis of 8.8% and 69.6% vs 5.5% and 29.6% for DBD (P < .001). DCD allograft recipient survival was 96% and 96% at the first and third year respectively, vs 96% and 93% with a DBD graft (NS). Survival of the graft was 91% and 86% at the 1(st) and 3(rd) years, vs 90% and 86% with a DBD allograft (NS). No significant difference was found between Maastricht type II and III. DCD were related to lower graft survival versus DBD under the age of 50 (n = 445), 86% vs 92% (P = .02) in the third year, but were similar to DBD from age 50 to 59 (n = 407) and higher than DBD over age 60 (n = 636), 80% at the 3(rd) year (NS). The survival of DCD recipients was not different than DBD in those under 60 and was significantly better than DBD at or over the age of 60 (96% vs 87% in the 3(rd) year, P = .036). In the multivariable survival study (Cox, covariates of influence previously demonstrated in our region) DCD are not a significant survival prognosis factor for the recipient or the allograft. CONCLUSIONS: With the current guidelines of donor selection and allocation of organs applied in Andalusia, the survival of kidney transplants from DCD overall is similar to DBD. The graft performance tends to be better than DBD over the age of 60, the main source of donors at present.

Impact of Asystolic Donations in Kidney Transplant Activity From Cadaveric Donors in Andalusia.

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from donors after brain death (DBD) cannot meet the demand for renal transplants in Andalusia. METHODS: We analyzed the impact of using non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) in Andalusia from the start of this program to the present. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2014, brain-death kidney donations remained at a standstill (1,635 in total) although NHBD increased from 2.4% to 16% annually, to 5% of the total (n = 164: 83 type II Maastricht [NHBD-T2] and 81 type III Maastricht [NHBD-T3]). The donors were more frequently men (T2 80.5% and T3 76.5% vs DBD 58.2%; P < .001). NHBD were younger (48.9 ± 10.8 y vs DBD 53.3 ± 16 y; P < .001); 11.6% of NHBD were >60 and 0% >70 years old, versus 39.4% and 15.2% of DBD, respectively; this is mostly explained by NHBD-T2 (48.9 ± 10.8 y vs DBD 53.3 ± 16 y). NHBD were used much less frequently than DBD in recipients over the age of 65 years or for retransplanted or hyperimmunized patients and never on priority recipients (children and combined transplant patients). Blood groups differed significantly among different donor types (A, O, B, AB): NHBD-T2 65.1%, 27.7%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively; NHBD-T3 45.7%, 45.7%, 8.6%, and 0%; and DBD 46.5%, 39.4%, 10.2 %, and 3.9% (P = .01). The immediate output of the graft also differed in the proportion of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function: NHBD-T2 9.8% and 70.7%, respectively; NHBD-T3 5.0% and 65.0%; and DBD 5.9% and 28.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The development of an NHBD program allows us to maintain and even increase transplants in our region. The impact on transplant access for O group recipients without priority will depend on the type of NHBD (low proportion of O group in NHBD-T2).

New Antivirals for Hepatitis C Infection Among Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Report.

The most common hepatopathy in end-stage renal disease is chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which decreases allograft and patient survival in kidney transplants. Until last year we did not have treatments free of interferon, which was contraindicated after renal transplantation owing to the risk of allograft rejection. Recently, new drugs have been discovered for interferon-free regimens. These drugs present a cure rate of up to 90% and can be used in transplant recipients. Here we present our 1st 3 cases. In our experience, new antivirals have proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of HCV hepatopathy in kidney transplant recipients and liver-kidney transplantation, thus helping us to prevent complications related to HCV infection in transplant recipients.