Cicatrizing keratoconjunctivitis secondary to ocular lichen planus: A case report.

The aim of this article is to report clinical features and therapeutic approach of cicatrizing keratoconjunctivitis secondary to ocular lichen planus based on a case report. The patient is a 77-year-old female with a history of ocular discomfort and recurrent keratoconjunctivitis that did not improve with conservative treatment, as well as a history of oral and nasal aphthous ulcers. After a complete ophthalmologic, dermatologic and anatomopathological study, the diagnosis of ocular lichen planus was established and immunosuppressive treatment was initiated. Most cases of ocular lichen planus are presented as chronic cicatricial conjunctivitis. A correct differential diagnosis, as well as an early detection are essential for the control of this entity and its sequelae. Treatment, based on corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, both topical and systemic, is aimed at controlling inflammation and scarring.

Prognosis of status epilepticus in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features and prognosis of status epilepticus (SE) in patients above 70 years old. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients ≥70 years old with SE registered prospectively during 4 years. Follow-up after discharge was performed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were evaluated. Acute symptomatic etiology was the most prevalent. The mean number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used was 2.7 ± 1.2, and 21% of the patients required sedation. A poor outcome was considered when death (31.1%) or developing of new neurological impairment at discharge (32.2%) occurred. After multivariate analysis, four variables predicted a poor outcome: acute symptomatic etiology (OR: 6.320; 95% CI: 1.976-20.217; P = .002), focal motor SE type (OR: 9.089; 95% CI: 2.482-33.283; P = .001), level of consciousness (OR: 4.596; 95% CI: 1.903-11.098; P = .001), and SE duration >12 hours (OR: 3.763; 95% CI: 1.130-12.530; P = .031). Independent predictive factors of mortality were SE duration >12 hours (OR: 4.306; 95% CI: 1.044-17.757; P = .043), modified Status Epilepticus Severity Score (mSTESS) (OR: 2.216; 95% CI: 1.313-3.740; P = .003), and development of complications (OR: 3.334; 95% CI: 1.004-11.070, P = .049). Considering long-term mortality, age (HR 1.036; 95% CI 1.001-1.071; P = .044), a potentially fatal underlying cause (HR 2.609; 95% CI 1.497- 4.548; P = .001), and mSTESS score >4 (HR 1.485; 95% CI 1.158-1.903; P = .002) remained as predictive factors. There was no association between sedation and the number of AEDs used with outcome at discharge or long-term mortality (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: SE above 70 years old has a high morbimortality. Prognosis is not related to treatment aggressiveness.

[Classification of idiopathic generalised epilepsies in patients over 16 years of age]. / Clasificacion de las epilepsias generalizadas idiopaticas en mayores de 16 años.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic generalised epilepsies (IGE) are a set of electroclinical syndromes with different phenotypes. Our aim is to analyse those phenotypes in patients over 16 years of age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a series of patients with IGE. They were classified as childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures only (TCSE), epilepsy with eyelid myoclonias and absences (EMA) and pure photogenic epilepsy (PE). RESULTS: We included 308 patients, the majority females (56.8%), in our study. JME was the most prevalent (40.9%), followed by TCSE (30%), JAE (10%), EMA (8.7%), CAE (7.7%) and PE (1.6%). The types of seizures presented by the most patients were tonic-clonic (89.6%), myoclonic (45.4%), absence (31.4%), reflex seizures (13.3%), eyelid myoclonias (12.6%), non-epileptic psychogenic seizures (3.6%) and status epilepticus (1.9%). They all had generalised spike-and-wave discharges in the electroencephalogram (EEG). 19.2% presented asymmetrical discharges and 28.2% showed a photoparoxysmal response. We observed differences between syndromes in polytherapy (p < 0.0001), withdrawal of therapy (p = 0.01) and being seizure-free beyond the age of 50 (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: JME was the most frequent. Generalised tonic-clonic seizures were the type of seizures presented by the most patients, followed by myoclonic, absent and reflex seizures. The EEG showed a photoparoxysmal response in over a quarter of the patients, and one in five displayed asymmetrical anomalies. Differences were observed according to the syndrome in polytherapy, persistence of seizures and withdrawal of treatment.

TITLE: Clasificacion de las epilepsias generalizadas idiopaticas en mayores de 16 años.Introduccion. Las epilepsias generalizadas idiopaticas (EGI) son un conjunto de sindromes electroclinicos con distintos fenotipos. Nuestro objetivo es analizar dichos fenotipos en pacientes mayores de 16 años. Pacientes y metodos. Analizamos retrospectivamente una serie de pacientes con EGI. Los clasificamos en epilepsia de ausencias infantil (EAI), epilepsia de ausencias juvenil (EAJ), epilepsia mioclonica juvenil (EMJ), epilepsia con crisis tonicoclonicas solo (ECTC), epilepsia con ausencias y mioclonias palpebrales (EAM) y epilepsia fotogenica pura (EF). Resultados. Incluimos 308 pacientes, mayoritariamente mujeres (56,8%). La EMJ fue mas prevalente (40,9%), seguida de la ECTC (30%), la EAJ (10%), la EAM (8,7%), la EAI (7,7%) y la EF (1,6%). Los tipos de crisis que presentaron mas pacientes fueron las tonicoclonicas (89,6%), las mioclonicas (45,4%), las ausencias (31,4%), las crisis reflejas (13,3%), las mioclonias palpebrales (12,6%), las crisis psicogenas no epilepticas (3,6%) y el estado epileptico (1,9%). Todos tenian descargas punta-onda generalizada en el electroencefalograma (EEG). El 19,2% presento descargas asimetricas y el 28,2%, respuesta fotoparoxistica. Observamos diferencias entre sindromes en politerapia (p < 0,0001), retirada de tratamiento (p = 0,01) y estar libres de crisis por encima de los 50 años (p = 0,004). Conclusiones. La EMJ fue la EGI mas frecuente. Las crisis tonicoclonicas generalizadas fueron el tipo de crisis que presentaron mas pacientes, seguidas de las mioclonicas, las ausencias y las crisis reflejas. El EEG mostro en mas de una cuarta parte de los pacientes una respuesta fotoparoxistica, y en uno de cada cinco, anomalias asimetricas. Se observaron diferencias segun el sindrome en politerapia, persistencia de crisis y retirada de tratamiento.

Safety, efficacy and outcome-related factors of perampanel over 12 months in a real-world setting: The FYDATA study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data of current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat focal seizures is of importance to understand the efficacy and safety outside of the clinical trial setting. Here we report real-world data from a large series of patients treated with perampanel for 1year. METHODS: FYDATA was a multicentre, retrospective, 1-year observational study assessing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant perampanel in patients ≥12 years of age with focal epilepsy in a real-world setting. At 12 months, the proportion of patients who were seizure free, median percentage seizure reduction, proportion of responders, retention rate and proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Analyses were also performed to identify any patient-, medication- and disease-related factors associated with a large clinical response or carry a risk for AEs. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients were included in the study with a retention rate of 60.6% at 1year. The mean number of prior AEDs was 7.8. The median percentage reduction in overall seizures was 33.3% (75% for secondary generalised seizures) after 1year, with 7.2% of patients achieving seizure freedom. Furthermore, patients on non-enzyme-inducing AEDs were more likely to achieve seizure freedom, and logistic regression revealed that patients aged ≥65 years, those with epilepsy due to a vascular aetiology and those who had received fewer prior AEDs showed a better clinical response to perampanel. A total of 62.9% of the patients experienced AEs at 12 months; dizziness, somnolence and irritability were the most frequent AEs. Patients with prior psychiatric comorbidities (hyperactivity and personality disorder) were more likely to experience psychiatric AEs with perampanel, and slower titration schedules were associated with less AEs overall. CONCLUSION: Perampanel, for the treatment of focal epilepsy in a real-world setting in a refractory population, over 1year, demonstrates a similar efficacy and safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. Our results have implications for the optimisation of perampanel use in a clinical setting.

A new clinical score for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The severity of status epilepticus (SE) has an important impact in clinical outcomes. The Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) is a score for predicting mortality in SE at admission. The baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) might be a prognostic factor for assessing the short-tem outcomes of SE. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of mRS and whether its addition to the STESS improves the prediction of mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients with SE and aged >16 years were recruited during 3 years. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a logistic regression model were developed to estimate the scores of the new score, designated as modified STESS (mSTESS), and it was subsequently compared with the STESS. RESULTS: In all, 136 patients were included. Mean age was 62.01 ± 17.62 (19-95) years, and 54% were male. The capacity of the STESS to predict mortality was 74.3% (95% confidence interval 63.8%-81.8%), whilst the capacity of the mRS to predict mortality was 65.2% (95% confidence interval 54.2%-76.2%). The logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic curves enabled the classification of mRS as follows: 0, mRS = 0; 1, mRS = 1-3; and 2, mRS > 3. These values, when added to the other items of the STESS, resulted in the mSTESS with scores between 0 and 8 points. The capacity of the mSTESS to predict mortality was 80.1%. An mSTESS > 4 established an overall accuracy of 81.8% for predicting mortality, which was considerably higher than the overall accuracy of STESS ≥ 3 (59.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The baseline mRS was associated with high mortality risk. It is proposed to use mSTESS to improve the prediction of mortality risk in SE.

Perampanel: revisión clínica de una nueva opción para el tratamiento de la epilepsia focal / Perampanel: clinical review of a new option for the treatment of focal epilepsy

No disponible

Reflex seizures triggered by cutaneous stimuli.

PURPOSE: Among the different precipitating stimuli for reflex seizures, Touch-Induced Seizures (TIS) and Hot Water Seizures (HWS) are consistently described in different reports. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical, EEG and image data of patients with TIS and HWS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who were followed up in our Epilepsy Unit and had seizures triggered by these stimuli. All patients were studied with electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance (MR). RESULTS: We recruited six patients, including five men, with an age range of 30-64 years-old. Four patients had TIS; all them had focal motor seizures after the stimuli, with epileptic foci in the fronto-central regions associated with peri-central gyri lesions on MR. One patient had HWS related to a septo-optic dysplasia with periopercular polymicrogyria, and one patient had focal seizures that evolved into bilateral convulsions triggered by washing the mouth with cold water. We considered this last patient to have water contact-induced seizures (WCIS). CONCLUSIONS: Seizures in TIS are most likely focal, without impairment of awareness, and refractory to medical treatment. Antiepileptic drugs can prevent the progression to bilateral convulsion. The origins of such seizures seem to be related to small lesions or epileptogenic zones in the perirolandic areas. Lesional HWS and WCIS are focal seizures that involve impairment of consciousness or focal seizures that evolve to bilateral convulsion, are not such location specific and involve larger ictogenic areas. In both epilepsies, stimulus avoidance is the most effective treatment.