Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Folia Microbiol (Praha) ; 68(2): 167-179, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367638

ABSTRACT

In this review, research on the use of microalgae as an option for bioremediation purposes of pharmaceutical compounds is reported and discussed thoroughly. Pharmaceuticals have been detected in water bodies around the world, attracting attention towards the increasing potential risks to humans and aquatic biota. Unfortunately, pharmaceuticals have no regulatory standards for safe disposal in many countries. Despite the advances in new analytical techniques, the current wastewater treatment facilities in many countries are ineffective to remove the whole presence of pharmaceutical compounds and their metabolites. Though new methods are substantially effective, removal rates of drugs from wastewater make the cost-effectiveness ratio a not viable option. Therefore, the necessity for investigating and developing more adequate removal treatments with a higher efficiency rate and at a lower cost is mandatory. The present review highlights the algae-based removal strategies for bioremediation purposes, considering their pathway as well as the removal rate and efficiency of the microalgae species used in assays. We have critically reviewed both application of living and non-living microalgae biomass for bioremediation purposes considering the most commonly used microalgae species. In addition, the use of modified and immobilized microalgae biomass for the removal of pharmaceutical compounds from water was discussed. Furthermore, research considering various microalgal species and their potential use to detoxify organic and inorganic toxic compounds were well evaluated in the review. Further research is required to exploit the potential use of microalgae species as an option for the bioremediation of pharmaceuticals in water.


Subject(s)
Microalgae , Humans , Microalgae/metabolism , Biodegradation, Environmental , Wastewater , Biomass , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34762559

ABSTRACT

The emerging contaminant 4-nonylphenol is an active ingredient in many surfactants. Though 4-nonylphenol has been reported in Mexican waterbodies, no stringent law is available to establish its permissible limits. Most ecotoxicological assays using zooplankton species are based on previously unexposed populations, and multigenerational experiments are rare. Plationus patulus and Brachionus havanaensis are widely distributed species in Mexico and have been used in ecotoxicological assessments. In this work, the median lethal concentration of 4-nonylphenol (LC50, 24 h) for both rotifer species was derived. Based on our acute toxicity data (24 h LC50 of 4-nonylphenol for P. patulus and B. havanaensis were 500 and 250 µg L-1, respectively), three sublethal concentrations (µg L-1) (7.81, 15.82 and 31.25 for B. havanaensis and 15.62, 31.25 and 62.5 for P. patulus) were used in the life table demography tests for two successive generations (F0 and F1) of either rotifer species. Regardless of the concentrations used, 4-nonylphenol had an adverse effect on both rotifer species over two successive generations. P. patulus was more sensitive than B. havanaensis in chronic toxicity tests. F1 generation of both rotifer species was far more adversely affected than the F0 in all toxicant treatments.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Rotifera , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Demography , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Phenols , Toxicity Tests, Chronic , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
3.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol ; 38(1): 4, 2021 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34825262

ABSTRACT

This review aims to elucidate the state of the art of microalgae-based biostimulants as a tool in agriculture by summarizing the biologically active compounds factors that influence the use of microalgae biostimulants and their application methods in the field. Additionally, we examined the factors that support the use of microalgal biostimulants to face abiotic and biotic stress in crop plants. The use of microalgae in crop production and the benefits of seed preparation, foliar application, soil drenching, and hydroponic treatments were discussed. Furthermore, the use of these biostimulants in crop plants and their multiple benefits such as, better rooting, higher crop, fruit yields, drought and salinity tolerance, photosynthetic activity and pathogen resistance was thoroughly presented. The present situation of microalgal biostimulants and their difficulties in the market was analyzed, as well as the perspectives of their use. However, data shows that microalgal derived biostimulants can be used as an alternative for the protection of crops and plant growth regulators and play a significant key role in increasing the levels of production, yield and health of crops. Special interest needs to focus on investigating more microalgae species and their biological active compound factors, due to the largely untapped field. Perspectives regarding future research lines and development priorities were included.


Subject(s)
Biological Factors/pharmacology , Crops, Agricultural/growth & development , Microalgae/physiology , Plant Growth Regulators/pharmacology , Crop Production , Crops, Agricultural/drug effects , Soil , Stress, Physiological
4.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 147: 275-282, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28850810

ABSTRACT

Triclosan is a personal care product widely used in North America, Europe and Asia as antimicrobial ingredient in many consumer chemical products. In Mexico concentrations of triclosan have been reported in aquatic systems. However, there is no law regulating the presence of chemicals such as triclosan, in aquatic systems. The scarce data about this chemical has increased concern among ecotoxicologists regarding possible effects on aquatic organisms. Moreover, multigenerational studies are rarely studied and the results vary depending on the contaminant. Rotifers, are a dominant group of zooplankton, and have been used in aquatic risk assessments of personal care products due to their sensitivity and high reproductive rates. Plationus patulus and Brachionus havanaensis are common rotifers distributed in aquatic ecosystems of Mexico and have been used in ecotoxicological bioassays. In this study, the median lethal concentration (LC50, 24h) of P. patulus and B. havanaensis exposed to triclosan was determined. Based on the LC50, we tested three sublethal concentrations of triclosan to quantify the demographic responses of both rotifers for two successive generations (F0, and F1). The 24h LC50 of triclosan for P. patulus and B. havanaensis were 300 and 500µgL-1 respectively. Despite the concentration, triclosan had an adverse effect on both Plationus patulus and Brachionus havanaensis in both generations exposed. Experiments show that P. patulus was more sensitive than B. havanaensis when exposed to triclosan. When exposed to triclosan the parental generation (F0) of P. patulus was far more affected than F1.


Subject(s)
Rotifera/drug effects , Triclosan/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Zooplankton/drug effects , Animals , Lethal Dose 50 , Mexico , Population Dynamics/trends , Reproduction/drug effects , Rotifera/growth & development , Species Specificity , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Toxicity Tests, Chronic
5.
J Environ Biol ; 35(1): 119-26, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24579527

ABSTRACT

Two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory commonly used in Mexico are paracetamol and diclofenac. These drugs reach natural waterbodies transport through the hydrological areas of agriculture and effluent treatment plants and can affect plankton. In this study, we quantified the chronic effects of paracetamol and sodium diclofenac on the population dynamics of the rotifer Plationus patulus and the cladoceran Moina macrocopa under laboratory conditions. Both these species of zooplankton are common in freshwaters and are sensitive to chemicals in the medium. Our results showed that densities of both P. patulus and M. macrocopa decreased with increasing levels of both the analgesic drugs. Both zooplankton species did not survive beyond when paracetamol was applied at 32 mg I(-1) in the medium. Diclofenac in general had more adverse effect than paracetamol for either zooplankton species. P. patulus was more sensitive than M. macrocopa to both analgesic drugs. When diclofenac was present in the medium at > or = 12.5 mg I(-1), rotifer reproduction was inhibited, while the tested cladocerans continued to grow but to lower densities compared to control. The rate of population increase (r) per day of P. patulus and M. macrocopa was significantly and inversely related to the concentration of paracetamol and diclofenac in the medium. However, the relationship between r and drug concentration differed depending on the zooplankton species and drug. In controls, the r of P. patulus was 0.18 d(-1), for M. macrocopa under similar conditions, it was slightly lower (0.16 d(-1)). The rvalues of both zooplankton populations became negative (-0.10 to -0.15 d(-1)) when exposed to paracetamol at 32 mg l(-1) or diclofenac at 25 mg I(-1).


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/toxicity , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/toxicity , Diclofenac/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Zooplankton/drug effects , Animals , Cladocera , Population Growth , Rotifera , Toxicity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...