ABSTRACT
Background: Facial nerve palsy is a multifaceted pathology that causes facial disfigurement, affecting eye closure, speech articulation, oral competence, and emotional expression, with functional, aesthetic, and psychological consequences. Standardized electrophysiological tests, such as electroneurography and electromyography, allow an objective evaluation of the functional state of the nerve. Here, we aimed to compare and correlate clinical findings with electromyography in patients with facial nerve palsy, before and after facial nerve reanimation with cross-facial nerve grafts. Methods: Eight patients with traumatic or nontraumatic facial paralysis with complete clinical records who underwent surgical reanimation of facial nerve with cross nerve grafts. Results: The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 173 days (interquartile range = 222). Outcomes were evaluated using standard clinical scales (House-Brackmann, Sunnybrook, and eFACE) and electromyography. The median time for postoperative outcome evaluation was 768 days (interquartile range = 1053). A statistically significant difference was found between pre- and postoperative outcomes according to eFACE (Δ median = 13, P = 0.003), House-Brackmann (Δ median = -2, P = 0.008), and electromyography (Δ mean = 855, P = 0.005). A positive correlation between electromyography and clinical evaluation with eFACE was observed (r = 0.751, 95% confidence interval = 0.174-0.944, P = 0.019). Conclusions: Our results suggest that cross nerve grafts are associated with clinical and electromyographic improvement of the paralyzed face. Electromyography and eFACE scores validate the reliability of eFACE scale for measuring postoperative outcomes. We suggest postoperative electromyography as an objective measure of postoperative evaluation in patients with a delay in improvement at 6-9 months.
