Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 118(4): 606-613, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30114337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the patterns of failure in patients with in-transit (IT) melanoma undergoing surgical excision. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent their first IT lesion(s) resection between May 2005 and September 2014. Cumulative incidence of local failure (new lesion within 2 cm of IT resection) was estimated. Associations between clinicopathologic characteristics, local failure, and any recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients presented to our institution with IT disease over the study period and met the inclusion criteria. The 2-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 19.5%. Twenty-four patients developed disease within 2 cm of the resected IT disease; however, only eight were isolated local events. Cumulative incidence of local failure and of any disease differed with respect to less than 1 year disease-free interval (DFI) from primary melanoma to first IT event, and having greater than 1 IT lesion at presentation. Incidence of local failure was not found to differ with respect to gross margin greater than 5 mm, after adjusting for DFI and greater than 1 IT lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater than 1 IT lesion and a DFI less than 1 year are at a higher risk of failure after surgical excision of a first IT event. Very few failures were isolated local disease within 2 cm of the IT resection scar, regardless of IT excision margin.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure
2.
Am Surg ; 84(4): 537-542, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29712602

ABSTRACT

For patients with ductal carcinoma In Situ (DCIS), sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is generally reserved for patients at high risk of being upstaged to invasive disease. The use of frozen section (FS) pathologic analysis of the primary tumor may allow for selective surgical nodal staging within one procedure. We sought to define the reliability of FS for detection of upstaging. Eight hundred and twenty-seven patients were identified with DCIS on core needle biopsy that underwent 834 operations at our institution between January 2004 and October 2014. We calculated the rate of upstage from DCIS to invasive cancer on both intraoperative FS and final pathology to determine the performance of FS. Upstage rate on final pathology was 118/834 (14.1%) 95 per cent confidence interval 11.8 to 16.7 per cent. FS identified 88/118 (74.6%) of the upstages. Specificity was 99.3 per cent (711/716). Overall accuracy was 95.8 per cent (799/834) and the positive predictive value was 96.0 per cent (711/741 patients). Mean size of invasive cancers identified on FS was 5.6 mm, versus 3.5 mm for those identified only on permanent section, P = 0.11. Intraoperative FS analysis of DCIS is useful for identification of upstage to invasive disease. This may facilitate a selective approach to SLN surgery that both decreases unnecessary SLN surgery and the need for a second operation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Frozen Sections , Intraoperative Care , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 117(6): 1164-1169, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29228467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with regionally advanced melanoma are at high risk of distant failure and unlikely to be cured by surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy may provide benefit in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our experience with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk stage III patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with advanced stage III disease who received neoadjuvant therapy between August 2009 and August 2016 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases met our inclusion criteria, 16 with resectable disease and 7 with unresectable disease. No patients with resectable disease and one patient with borderline resectable disease progressed regionally, prohibiting surgical resection. Five of seven patients with unresectable disease were down-staged to a resectable state. Six of twenty-three (26%) had a CR and five are alive at last follow-up. Fifteen of twenty three patients (65%) progressed with a median progression free survival of 11 months; however, the 5 year overall survival estimate was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is a reasonable approach for patients with advanced but resectable/borderline resectable disease and the risk of losing regional control is low. Our data also suggest some patients with unresectable disease will be converted to resectable and a complete clinical response to treatment can be obtained in approximately one quater of patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(10): 2915-2924, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8-56% of patients with a core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will be upstaged to invasive disease at the time of excision. Patients with invasive disease are recommended to undergo axillary nodal staging, most often requiring a second operation. We developed and validated a nomogram to preoperatively predict percentage of risk for upstaging to invasive cancer. METHODS: We reviewed 834 cases of DCIS on CNB between January 2004 and October 2014. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate CNB and imaging factors to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of upstaging from DCIS to invasive cancer. This nomogram was validated with an external dataset of 579 similar patients between November 1998 and September 2016. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate nomogram discrimination. RESULTS: The rate of upstaging to invasive disease was 118/834 (14.1%). On multivariable analysis, grade on CNB and imaging factors, including mass lesion, multicentric disease, and largest linear dimension, were associated with upstage to invasive disease, and was used to develop a nomogram (c-statistic 0.71). In the external validation dataset, 62/579 (10.7%) patients were upstaged to invasive disease. Our nomogram was validated in this dataset with a c-statistic of 0.71. CONCLUSION: For patients with a CNB diagnosis of DCIS, our validated nomogram using DCIS grade on biopsy, and imaging factors of mass lesion, multicentric disease, and largest linear dimension, may be used for preoperative assessment of risk of upstaging to invasive disease, allowing patient counseling regarding axillary staging at the time of definitive surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Nomograms , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , ROC Curve , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
5.
J Surg Oncol ; 116(2): 213-219, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current randomized controlled trials are investigating the outcomes of non-surgical treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to evaluate pre-operative factors associated with no residual disease at definitive resection following a core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of DCIS. METHODS: Eight hundred and thirty-four operations for DCIS were performed at our institution between January 2004 and October 2014. We evaluated patient and biopsy tumor characteristics to determine pre-operative factors associated with no residual disease at surgical resection using uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (8%) had no residual disease on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, low- or intermediate-grade lesions, <1 cm in size on mammography, and lesions where ≥90% of calcifications were removed correlated with finding no residual disease on final pathology, c-statistic 0.84. Of the 14 patients with all three low-risk factors, 36% had no residual disease on final pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Although our multivariable analysis performed well, its clinical utility would be limited as we were unable to identify a subset of patients with DCIS in whom the probability of finding no residual disease is low enough to consider routine use of non-surgical management.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Neoplasm, Residual , Calcinosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis
6.
JAMA Dermatol ; 152(9): 1008-14, 2016 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27487033

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Whether the use of sterile vs nonsterile gloves in outpatient cutaneous procedures affects the rate of postoperative wound infection is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To explore rates of surgical site infection (SSI) with the use of sterile vs nonsterile gloves in outpatient cutaneous surgical procedures. DATA SOURCES: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified studies from Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to present), Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1991 to present), Ovid EMBASE (1988 to present), EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1980 to present), Scopus (1996 to present), and Web of Science (1975 to present). STUDY SELECTION: Studies with information on sterile vs nonsterile gloves in outpatient surgical procedures were retrieved. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies were included for final analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Data of trial design, surgery characteristics, and outcomes from published manuscripts and unpublished data were independently extracted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Randomized clinical trials were considered high quality if randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up completeness were appropriate. Relative risk and 95% CIs were derived for postoperative wound infections. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met eligibility and inclusion criteria for systematic review; they included 12 275 unique patients who had undergone 12 275 unique outpatient procedures with sterile or nonsterile gloves and had follow-up regarding SSI. With the exclusion of 1 single-arm observational study of 1204 patients, 11 071 patients from 13 studies remained in the meta-analysis. Of these, 228 patients were documented as having postoperative SSI (2.1%), including 107 of 5031 patients in the nonsterile glove group (2.1%) and 121 of 6040 patients in the sterile glove group (2.0%). Overall relative risk for SSI with nonsterile glove use was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.39). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference was found in the rate of postoperative SSI between outpatient surgical procedures performed with sterile vs nonsterile gloves.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gloves, Surgical , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Sterilization , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Dentistry , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Humans , Oral Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
7.
J Surg Oncol ; 114(2): 187-92, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27189050

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) has an established role in the management of melanoma, but its role for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is less well defined. METHODS: Retrospective review of our institutional experience with HILP for MCC was conducted (2009-2015). Literature search was performed through 04/2015 and 10 studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Four patients underwent HILP for MCC at our institution. There were no major complications and complete response was achieved in all patients. Early metastatic recurrence developed in two patients. The remaining two had no evidence of disease at last follow-up (36 months) or death (39 months). Systematic review identified an additional 12 pts that underwent HILP for MCC, for a total of 16 cases. Median age was 73 [IQR 69-78] years and 56% were men. Of the patients with reported follow-up, 12 (86%) had complete response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 partial response. Four patients developed local-regional recurrence and six distant metastases, all within 6 months. Overall median follow-up time was 15 [7-36] months. CONCLUSION: Among a highly selective group of patients, regional perfusion for MCC is safe and has a high complete response rate. HILP is an acceptable therapeutic modality for obtaining durable loco-regional control but early distant metastatic disease remains a significant cause of mortality. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:187-192. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Extremities/blood supply , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies
8.
J Am Coll Surg ; 223(1): 77-85.e1, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of SLNB for in-transit (IT) melanoma is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the rate and prognostic significance of occult nodal disease in patients undergoing surgical nodal staging for IT disease. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with IT melanoma from May 2005 through September 2014. Analysis was limited to patients with a first-time IT event who underwent surgical excision. Associations between clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients treated at our center were identified and 157 met inclusion criteria, of which 135 (86%) presented with no evidence of nodal disease. At the time of surgical excision of the IT lesion, 80 (58%) clinically node-negative patients underwent observation of the nodal basin and 55 (41%) surgical nodal staging. Twenty (36%) clinically node-negative but surgically staged patients were found to have nodal disease. Distant metastasis-free survival was 70.8 months for surgically staged node-negative patients, 19.2 months for surgically staged node-positive patients, 22.8 months for those staged node-negative by clinical examination only and 4.8 months for those with clinical nodal disease (p = 0.01). The regional nodal basin was the first site of failure in 14 of 66 (21%) clinically staged patients, 5 of 50 (10%) for those surgically staged, and 6 of 16 (38%) for those with clinical nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IT disease are at high risk for occult nodal metastasis. Because clinical staging is unreliable, SLNB should be considered. For patients with IT recurrence, the status of the regional basin is strongly prognostic and stratifies patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...