Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(7): e5973, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39015355

ABSTRACT

Background: Facial nerve palsy is a multifaceted pathology that causes facial disfigurement, affecting eye closure, speech articulation, oral competence, and emotional expression, with functional, aesthetic, and psychological consequences. Standardized electrophysiological tests, such as electroneurography and electromyography, allow an objective evaluation of the functional state of the nerve. Here, we aimed to compare and correlate clinical findings with electromyography in patients with facial nerve palsy, before and after facial nerve reanimation with cross-facial nerve grafts. Methods: Eight patients with traumatic or nontraumatic facial paralysis with complete clinical records who underwent surgical reanimation of facial nerve with cross nerve grafts. Results: The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 173 days (interquartile range = 222). Outcomes were evaluated using standard clinical scales (House-Brackmann, Sunnybrook, and eFACE) and electromyography. The median time for postoperative outcome evaluation was 768 days (interquartile range = 1053). A statistically significant difference was found between pre- and postoperative outcomes according to eFACE (Δ median = 13, P = 0.003), House-Brackmann (Δ median = -2, P = 0.008), and electromyography (Δ mean = 855, P = 0.005). A positive correlation between electromyography and clinical evaluation with eFACE was observed (r = 0.751, 95% confidence interval = 0.174-0.944, P = 0.019). Conclusions: Our results suggest that cross nerve grafts are associated with clinical and electromyographic improvement of the paralyzed face. Electromyography and eFACE scores validate the reliability of eFACE scale for measuring postoperative outcomes. We suggest postoperative electromyography as an objective measure of postoperative evaluation in patients with a delay in improvement at 6-9 months.

2.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(4): 483-491, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34028818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeon (ACS) Surgical Risk Calculator is an online tool that helps surgeons estimate the risk of postoperative complications for numerous surgical procedures across several surgical specialties. METHODS: We evaluated the predictive performance of the calculator in 385 cancer patients undergoing breast surgery. Calculator-predicted complication rates were compared with observed complication rates; calculator performance was evaluated using calibration and discrimination analyses. RESULTS: The mean calculator-predicted rates for any complication (4.1%) and serious complication (3.2%) were significantly lower than the observed rates (11.2% and 5.2%, respectively). The area under the curve was 0.617 for any complication and 0.682 for serious complications. p Values for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were significant (<.05) for both outcomes. Brier scores were 0.102 for any complication and 0.048 for serious complication. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS risk calculator is not an ideal tool for predicting individual risk of complications following breast surgery in a Mexican cohort. The most valuable use of the calculator may reside in its role as an aid for patient-led surgery planning. The possibility of introducing breast surgery-specific data could improve the performance of the calculator. Furthermore, a disease-specific calculator could provide more accurate predictions and include complications more frequently found in breast cancer surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 83-90, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581365

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of saliva sampling as a non-invasive and safer tool to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to compare its reproducibility and sensitivity with nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPS). The use of sample pools was also investigated. METHODS: A total of 2107 paired samples were collected from asymptomatic healthcare and office workers in Mexico City. Sixty of these samples were also analyzed in two other independent laboratories for concordance analysis. Sample processing and analysis of virus genetic material were performed according to standard protocols described elsewhere. A pooling analysis was performed by analyzing the saliva pool and the individual pool components. RESULTS: The concordance between NPS and saliva results was 95.2% (kappa 0.727, p = 0.0001) and 97.9% without considering inconclusive results (kappa 0.852, p = 0.0001). Saliva had a lower number of inconclusive results than NPS (0.9% vs 1.9%). Furthermore, saliva showed a significantly higher concentration of both total RNA and viral copies than NPS. Comparison of our results with those of the other two laboratories showed 100% and 97% concordance. Saliva samples are stable without the use of any preservative, and a positive SARS-CoV-2 sample can be detected 5, 10, and 15 days after collection when the sample is stored at 4 °C. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that saliva is as effective as NPS for the identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected asymptomatic patients. Sample pooling facilitates the analysis of a larger number of samples, with the benefit of cost reduction.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Saliva/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Nasopharynx/virology , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen Handling
4.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 74: 173-176, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871401

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Schwannomas are rare, slow-growing, usually benign tumors that originate from myelin-producing Schwann cells. Adrenal schwannomas are an exceptionally rare subset of these tumors, with few cases reported in the literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 44-year old female patient being evaluated for chronic abdominal pain at the outpatient clinic. Clinical and laboratory workup was unremarkable. An abdominal CT scan was performed, revealing a left suprarenal solid mass (5 × 6 cm). Surgical resection of the adrenal gland was performed, given the patient's symptoms, the size of the tumor, and its malignant potential. The patient completed the postoperative period satisfactorily, and her symptoms improved. Histopathological findings were compatible with a benign adrenal schwannoma. DISCUSSION: Schwannomas generally appear in the head, neck and extremities, with the vestibulocochlear nerve being the most frequently involved site. Retroperitoneal schwannomas account for 1-5% of retroperitoneal masses and comprise only 1-3% of all schwannomas. Their incidence increases with age, from 4% in the general population, reaching 7% in patients over 70 years of age. CONCLUSION: Adrenal incidentalomas represent a diagnostic challenge. Because of the malignant potential of large (> 4 cm) adrenal masses and the lack of characteristic findings using conventional imaging techniques and laboratory diagnostic tools, surgical excision with histopathology and immunohistochemistry analysis are required for definitive diagnosis and optimal management.

5.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 6: 1439-1445, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997539

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of the members of the ASCO-sponsored Oncology Student Interest Groups (OSIGs) in Latin America. METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study. We surveyed 97 OSIG members from three medical schools in Peru and Mexico. We administered a 60-question survey covering topics including personal background, oncology training experience, and professional practice expectations and preferences. RESULTS: A little more than one half of the surveyed OSIG members were female. More than one half had a visa to visit the United States and had an advanced level of English. One half of the OSIG members were also ASCO members. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that participation in their OSIG increased their interest in cancer-related specialties (94%) and provided professional networking opportunities (94%) and that it was accessible to all students (91%). Most participants believed that their OSIG had sufficient resources to carry out its activities. Students were asked to rate their interest when they entered medical school versus at the time of the survey. Most of the members were strongly interested in pursuing surgical oncology. The majority of members were somewhat interested or very interested in palliative care and medical oncology. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study that provides data on medical student perceptions of the Latin American OSIGs sponsored by ASCO. Student perceptions of medical oncology and the impact of OSIGs were generally positive. Given the shortages of oncology specialists in Latin American and elsewhere, strategies to engage medical students in the pursuit of cancer-related careers are becoming increasingly essential.


Subject(s)
Public Opinion , Students, Medical , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Latin America , Medical Oncology , Mexico , Peru , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...