Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 69(3): 292-304, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25683794

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our review analyses the studies that have specifically compared the association iDPP4/metformin with glimepiride/metformin, both in second line pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). METHODS: Systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing glimepiride with any iDPP4, both used together with metformin as a second line treatment of DM2. The effectiveness variables used were as follows: %HbA1c variation, fasting plasma glucose variation, patients achieving the therapeutic objective of HbA1c <7%, treatment dropouts due to lack of effectiveness and rescue treatments needed. The safety variables included were as follows: weight variation at the end of treatment; presentation of any type of adverse event; presentation of serious adverse events; patients who experienced any type of hypoglycaemia; patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia; treatments suspended due to adverse effects; and deaths for any reason. RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The group treated with glimepiride showed better results in all effectiveness variables. Regarding safety variables, the main differences observed were in the greater number of cases with hypoglycaemia in the group treated with glimepiride, and the serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to these which occurred in slightly over 2% more cases in this group compared to the iDPP4 group. The remaining adverse events, including mortality, did not show any differences between both groups. The variation in the weight difference between groups (2.1 kg) is not considered clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: A greater effectiveness is seen in the glimepiride/metformin association, which should not be diminished by slight differences in adverse effects, with absence of severe hypoglycaemia in over 98% of patients under treatment. The association of glimepiride/metformin, both due to cost as well as effectiveness and safety, may be the preferential treatment for most DM2 patients, and it offers a potential advantage in refractory hyperglycemic populations, tolerant to treatment.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
2.
Gac Med Mex ; 133(5): 475-7, 1997.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9504075

ABSTRACT

We inform of one case of fever and characteristic hepatic granuloma in which the final diagnosis was Q fever. The interest of this case lies in the fact that the patient did not have the usual epidemiological antecedent and its typical clinical presentation.


Subject(s)
Granuloma/etiology , Hepatitis/etiology , Liver Diseases/etiology , Q Fever/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Granuloma/diagnosis , Granuloma/pathology , Hepatitis/diagnosis , Hepatitis/pathology , Humans , Liver/pathology , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Q Fever/diagnosis , Q Fever/drug therapy , Tetracycline/administration & dosage , Tetracycline/therapeutic use , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...