Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(5): e0407323, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567975

ABSTRACT

Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) were widely deployed to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with national guidance for low prevalence settings, positive Ag-RDTs were confirmed using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to avoid false positive results. However, increasing demands for positive Ag-RDT confirmation competed with other testing priorities in clinical laboratories. This work hypothesized that real-time RT-PCR without nucleic acid extraction (NAE) would be sufficiently sensitive to support positive Ag-RDT confirmation. Ag-RDT and NAAT results from community-based asymptomatic testing sites prior to the omicron variant wave were compared to calculate the weekly false positive rate (FPR) and false detection rate (FDR). Real-time RT-PCR was compared with and without NAE using 752 specimens previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using commercial NAATs and 344 specimens from Ag-RDT-positive individuals. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence on laboratory resources required to sustain Ag-RDT confirmation was modeled for the RT-PCR with and without NAE. Overall, FPR was low [0.07% (222/330,763)] in asymptomatic testing sites, but FDR was high [30.7% (222/724)]. When RT-PCR was compared with and without NAE, 100% concordance was obtained with NAAT-positive specimens, including those from Ag-RDT-positive individuals. NAE-free RT-PCR significantly reduced time to results, human resources, and overall costs. A 30.7% FDR reaffirms the need for NAAT-based confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results during low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. NAE-free RT-PCR was shown to be a simple and cost-sparing NAAT-based solution for positive Ag-RDT confirmation, and its implementation supported data-driven broader Ag-RDT deployment into communities, workplaces, and households. IMPORTANCE: Rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 was widely deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In settings of low prevalence, national guidance recommends that positive antigen test results be confirmed with molecular testing. Given the high testing burden on clinical laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic, the high volume of positive antigen tests submitted for confirmatory testing posed challenges for laboratory workflow. This study demonstrated that a simple PCR method without prior nucleic acid purification is an accurate and cost-effective solution for positive rapid antigen test confirmation. Implementing this method allowed molecular confirmatory testing for positive antigen tests to be sustained as antigen testing was expanded into large populations such as workplaces, schools, and households.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Prevalence , False Positive Reactions , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
3.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(4): e0063922, 2022 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35863036

ABSTRACT

Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In settings of low disease prevalence, such as asymptomatic community testing, national guidelines recommend confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). This often requires patients to be recalled for repeat specimen recollection and subsequent testing in reference laboratories. This project assessed the use of a point-of-care molecular NAAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection (i.e., ID NOW), which was performed on-site at a volunteer-led asymptomatic community testing site on the residual test buffer (RTB) from positive Ag-RDTs. The ID NOW NAAT assay was performed on RTB from two Ag-RDTs: the Abbott Panbio and BTNX Rapid Response assays. Results of ID NOW were compared to real-time RT-PCR at a reference laboratory. Along with investigations into the clinical performance of ID NOW on RTB, analytical specificity was assessed with a panel of various respiratory organisms. Of the Ag-RDTs results evaluated, all 354 Ag-RDTs results characterized as true positives by RT-PCR were accurately identified with ID NOW testing of RTB. No SARS-CoV-2 detections by ID NOW were observed from 10 specimens characterized as false-positive Ag-RDTs, or from contrived specimens with various respiratory organisms. The use of on-site molecular testing on RTB provides a suitable option for rapid confirmatory testing of positive Ag-RDTs, thereby obviating the need for specimen recollection for molecular testing at local reference laboratories. IMPORTANCE During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid antigen tests have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. These simple devices allow rapid test results. However, false-positive results may occur. As such, individuals with positive rapid tests often must return to testing centers to have a second swab collected, which is then transported to a specialized laboratory for confirmation using molecular tests. As an alternative to requiring a repeat visit and a prolonged turn-around time for result confirmation, this project evaluated whether the leftover material from rapid antigen tests could be confirmed directly on a portable point-of-care molecular instrument. Using this approach, molecular confirmation of positive antigen tests could be performed in less than 15 min, and the results were equivalent to laboratory-based confirmation. This procedure eliminates the need for individuals to return to testing centers following a positive rapid antigen test and ensures accurate antigen test results through on-site confirmation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Point-of-Care Systems , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(4): e0021722, 2022 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762772

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has been hallmarked by several waves of variants of concern (VoCs), each with novel challenges. Currently, the highly transmissible Omicron VoC is predominant worldwide, and sore throat is common, among other cold-like symptoms. Anecdotes on social media have suggested that sampling one's throat can increase the sensitivity for Omicron detection by antigen-based rapid testing devices (Ag-RDTs). This work aimed to improve the local testing strategy and determine whether the sensitivity of Ag-RDTs designed for nasal sampling is altered with the use of self-administered throat swabs in self-perceived asymptomatic individuals. This investigation used a common Ag-RDT (i.e., Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) to compare three sampling sites: nasal swab, throat swab, and combined nasal/throat. All Ag-RDT results were confirmed with molecular testing from residual test buffer. Compared to reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), samples from nasal or throat swabs each detected 64.5% of SARS-CoV-2 cases; however, combining the contributions of each swab increased the positive percent agreement (PPA) with RT-PCR to 88.7%. This trend was also evident with the Rapid Response Ag-RDT (BTNX), which uses more flexible swabs than does the Panbio. When nasal swab collection was compared to paired sampling of the nose/throat using a single swab with the Panbio Ag-RDT, the PPAs were 68.4% and 81.6%, respectively. No false-positive results were observed with nasal, throat, or combined nasal/throat sampling. Self-administered throat and nasal/throat swabs both had >90% acceptability. These findings support the use of self-collected combined nasal/throat sampling for Ag-RDT-based SARS-CoV-2 detection in self-perceived asymptomatic individuals. IMPORTANCE This quality project demonstrates that combining the results of nasal and throat swabs or using a combined single swab of the throat and nares resulted in increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 using a rapid antigen test, in an asymptomatic population. Importantly, no false positives were detected, and over 90% of people were willing to perform the combination swab. These types of projects are instrumental in informing local practices to improve testing strategies. These data support the option of using a combined nasal/throat swab in our local setting to enhance the detection of Omicron.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Pandemics , Pharynx , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 15(5): 1382-8, 2013 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23187309

ABSTRACT

An increased level of uric acid in urine and plasma is indicative of the development of preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder that can occur during pregnancy. The preliminary steps towards developing a rapid tool for early diagnosis of preeclampsia using electrochemical SERS (E-SERS) for the detection of uric acid in urine are presented herein. Characterization of the uric acid species was completed using cyclic voltammetry, UV spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (E-SERS). E-SERS was capable of easily detecting uric acid directly at concentrations <1 mM in urine simulant, without the need for costly enzymes and bulky equipment, and thus demonstrates promise as a rapid point-of-care diagnostic tool for detection of early onset preeclampsia in developing nation settings.


Subject(s)
Electrochemical Techniques , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Spectrum Analysis, Raman , Uric Acid/urine , Female , Humans , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Pregnancy , Silver/chemistry
6.
Nurs Stand ; 5(45): 42, 1991 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27652769

ABSTRACT

The interesting article by Marie Kedzierski on 'Management of viral hepatitis' (Nursing Standard July 10) referred to several practices in relation to hepatitis A infection which are not always required in modern hospitals.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...