ABSTRACT
The probability of detecting influenza A virus (IAV) in oral fluid (OF) specimens was calculated for each of 13 assays based on real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and 7 assays based on virus isolation (VI). The OF specimens were inoculated with H1N1 or H3N2 IAV and serially diluted 10-fold (10(-1) to 10(-8)). Eight participating laboratories received 180 randomized OF samples (10 replicates × 8 dilutions × 2 IAV subtypes plus 20 IAV-negative samples) and performed the rRT-PCR and VI procedure(s) of their choice. Analysis of the results with a mixed-effect logistic-regression model identified dilution and assay as variables significant (P < 0.0001) for IAV detection in OF by rRT-PCR or VI. Virus subtype was not significant for IAV detection by either rRT-PCR (P = 0.457) or VI (P = 0.101). For rRT-PCR the cycle threshold (Ct) values increased consistently with dilution but varied widely. Therefore, it was not possible to predict VI success on the basis of Ct values. The success of VI was inversely related to the dilution of the sample; the assay was generally unsuccessful at lower virus concentrations. Successful swine health monitoring and disease surveillance require assays with consistent performance, but significant differences in reproducibility were observed among the assays evaluated.
La probabilité de détecter le virus de l'influenza A (VIA) dans des échantillons de fluide oral (FO) a été calculée pour chacune des 13 épreuves basées sur une réaction d'amplification en chaine en temps réel utilisant la polymérase réverse (rRT-PCR) et 7 épreuves basées sur l'isolement viral (IV). Les échantillons de FO ont été inoculés avec du VIA H1N1 ou H3N2 et dilués en série par facteur de 10 (10−1 à 10−8). Huit laboratoires participants ont reçu 180 échantillons randomisés de FO (10 réplicats × 8 dilutions × 2 sous-types de VIA plus 20 échantillons témoins négatifs sans VIA) et ont réalisé la méthode de rRT-PCR et d'IV de leur choix. L'analyse des résultats à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logistique pour les effets mélangés a identifié la dilution et l'épreuve comme étant des variables significatives (P < 0,0001) pour la détection de VIA dans du FO par rRT-PCR ou IV. Le sous-type de virus n'était pas significatif pour la détection de VIA soit par rRT-PCR (P = 0,457) ou par IV (P = 0,101). Pour les épreuves rRT-PCR les valeurs seuils de cycle (Ct) augmentaient de manière constante avec la dilution mais variaient énormément. Ainsi, il n'était pas possible de prédire le succès de l'IV sur la base des valeurs de Ct. Le succès de l'IV était inversement relié à la dilution de l'échantillon; l'épreuve était généralement négative aux faibles concentrations de virus. Pour avoir du succès dans la surveillance des maladies et de la santé des porcs il est nécessaire d'avoir des épreuves avec des performances constantes, mais des différences significatives dans la reproductibilité ont été observées parmi les épreuves évaluées.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).
Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Saliva/virology , Swine Diseases/virology , Animals , Female , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosisSubject(s)
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/classification , Animal Husbandry/history , Animals , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , North America/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/transmission , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/genetics , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/isolation & purification , SwineABSTRACT
The probability of detecting influenza A virus (IAV) by virus isolation (VI), point-of-care (POC) antigen detection, and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was estimated for pen-based oral fluid (OF) and individual pig nasal swab (NS) specimens. Piglets (n=82) were isolated for 30 days and confirmed negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, and IAV infections. A subset (n=28) was vaccinated on day post inoculation (DPI) -42 and -21 with a commercial multivalent vaccine. On DPI 0, pigs were intratracheally inoculated with contemporary isolates of H1N1 (n=35) or H3N2 (n=35) or served as negative controls (n=12). OF (n=370) was collected DPI 0-16 and NS (n=924) DPI 0-6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16. The association between IAV detection and variables of interest (specimen, virus subtype, assay, vaccination status, and DPI) was analyzed by mixed-effect repeated measures logistic regression and the results used to calculate the probability (pË) of detecting IAV in OF and NS over DPI by assay. Vaccination (p-value<0.0001), DPI (p-value<0.0001), and specimen-assay interaction (p-value<0.0001) were significant to IAV detection, but virus subtype was not (p-value=0.89). Vaccination and/or increasing DPI reduced pË for all assays. VI was more successful using NS than OF, but both VI and POC were generally unsuccessful after DPI 6. Overall, rRT-PCR on OF specimens provided the highest pË for the most DPIs, yet significantly different results were observed between the two laboratories independently performing rRT-PCR testing.
