Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol ; 30(3): 360-79, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17852608

ABSTRACT

Controversy surrounding the causation of symptom complaints after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is reflected by the existence of alternative diagnostic criteria for postconcussional syndrome (PCS) in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and postconcussional disorder (PCD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th edition (DSM-IV). Previous studies of persisting symptoms have employed various symptom checklists rather than uniform criteria-based diagnoses. This is the first prospective study of persisting symptom complaints using the formal diagnostic criteria for PCD and PCS and comparing these criteria sets in terms of prevalence, relationship to potential compensation, and emotional/functional status. In this prospective study, an unselected series of adults with uncomplicated MTBI (N = 139) was assessed at 6 months postinjury with a brief neuropsychological battery and measures of psychiatric symptoms/disorders, social support/community integration, health-related quality of life, and global outcome. In parallel analyses, participants with PCD/PCS were compared to those without the disorder. Potential compensation was an equally significant factor in both criteria sets. Persistent PCS criteria were met 3.1 times more frequently than persistent PCD criteria. Significant racial differences in fulfilling PCD/PCS criteria were found. No differences in emotional/functional status patterns or global outcome were found between the criteria sets except for minor dissimilarities in the social/community integration domain. The results demonstrate that despite large differences in the frequency of patients meeting the two diagnostic criteria sets, a clear basis for preferring either the PCD or PCS criteria remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases , Post-Concussion Syndrome/diagnosis , Post-Concussion Syndrome/psychology , Statistics as Topic/methods , Adult , Demography , Emotions , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Health Status , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Mental Disorders/etiology , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Post-Concussion Syndrome/complications , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Social Support , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young Adult
2.
Brain Inj ; 20(5): 519-27, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16716998

ABSTRACT

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) is a frequently-used self-report measure of depressive symptom severity. Brief depression screening measures can be important in the identification and prediction of depression following traumatic brain injury. The objective of this study was to investigate the validity of the CES-D in measuring depressive symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate TBI as it has been rarely used in neurologically compromised populations. RESEARCH DESIGN: Inception cohort. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The CES-D was administered to 340 participants with mild-to-moderate TBI at 3-months post-injury. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of the CES-D indicated that the data are a reasonable fit similar to that of Radloff 's original 4-factor model. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the CES-D may be appropriate for use in patients with mild-to-moderate TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Adult , Cohort Studies , Depression/etiology , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 193(8): 540-50, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16082299

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with postconcussional disorder (PCD) under the provisionally proposed criteria in the DSM-IV and how they differ from patients diagnosed with postconcussional syndrome (PCS) under the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition clinical (ICD-10) criteria. This study investigated differences in outcome based on a diagnosis of PCD (DSM-IV) versus PCS (ICD-10 clinical criteria) as to which criteria set might be preferred for clinical practice. A consecutive series of adult patients with mild (N = 319) to moderate (N = 21) traumatic brain injury was assessed at 3 months postinjury with a brief neuropsychological battery and measures of specific outcome domains. In two separate series of analyses, patients with PCD were compared with those without PCD, and those with PCS were compared with those without PCS. Although the two criteria sets resulted in markedly different incidence rates, there was no substantial pattern of differences between the DSM-IV and ICD-10 in the outcome domains of psychiatric symptoms and disorders, social and community integration, health-related quality of life, or global outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. In spite of significant differences between the two diagnostic criteria sets and different incidence rates for PCD/PCS, outcome in all measured domains was very similar at 3 months postinjury. There is no compelling evidence, based on these outcome domains, to suggest which of the two diagnostic criteria sets should be clinically preferred.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases/statistics & numerical data , Post-Concussion Syndrome/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Injuries/psychology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Post-Concussion Syndrome/classification , Post-Concussion Syndrome/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Trauma Severity Indices
4.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 62(5): 523-8, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15867105

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Minimizing negative consequences of major depression following traumatic brain injury is an important public health objective. Identifying high-risk patients and referring them for treatment could reduce morbidity and loss of productivity. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for early screening of patients at risk for major depressive episode at 3 months after traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Prediction model using receiver operating characteristic curve. SETTING: Level I trauma center in a major metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort of 129 adults with mild traumatic brain injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score and current major depressive episode module of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV. RESULTS: A prediction model including higher 1-week Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score, older age, and computed tomographic scans of intracranial lesions yielded 93% sensitivity and 62% specificity. CONCLUSION: This study supports the feasibility of identifying patients with mild traumatic brain injury who are at high risk for developing major depressive episode by 3 months' postinjury, which could facilitate selective referral for potential treatment and reduction of negative outcomes.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Brain Injuries/complications , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/etiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/prevention & control , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Models, Statistical , Probability , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Trauma Severity Indices
5.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 16(4): 493-9, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15616177

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to compare diagnoses of postconcussional syndrome between the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV). The patient sample was comprised of 178 adults with mild-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study design was inception cohort, and the main outcome measure was a structured interview 3 months after injury. The results were that, despite concordance of DSM-IV and ICD-10 symptom criteria (kappa=0.73), agreement between overall DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnoses was slight (kappa=0.13) because fewer patients met the DSM-IV cognitive deficit and clinical significance criteria. Agreement between DSM-IV postconcussional disorder and ICD-10 postconcussional syndrome appears limited by different prevalences and thresholds.


Subject(s)
Post-Concussion Syndrome/diagnosis , Adult , Brain Concussion/pathology , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Terminology as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...