Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 218(8): 704-13, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25865927

ABSTRACT

Household water treatment and safe storage (HWTS) provides a solution, when employed correctly and consistently, for managing water safety at home. However, despite years of promotion by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governments and others, boiling is the only method to achieve scale. Many HWTS programs have reported strong initial uptake and use that then decreases over time. This study maps out enablers and barriers to sustaining and scaling up HWTS practices. Interviews were carried out with 79 practitioners who had experience with HWTS programs in over 25 countries. A total of 47 enablers and barriers important to sustaining and scaling up HWTS practices were identified. These were grouped into six domains: user guidance on HWTS products; resource availability; standards, certification and regulations; integration and collaboration; user preferences; and market strategies. Collectively, the six domains cover the major aspects of moving products from development to the consumers. It is important that each domain is considered in all programs that aim to sustain and scale-up HWTS practices. Our findings can assist governments, NGOs, and other organizations involved in HWTS to approach programs more effectively and efficiently.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Water Purification/methods , Water Quality , Water Supply/standards , Global Health , Hot Temperature , Humans , Transportation
2.
Soc Sci Med ; 75(4): 738-46, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621996

ABSTRACT

Over 5 billion people worldwide are exposed to unsafe water. Given the obstacles to ensuring sustainable improvements in water supply infrastructure and the unhygienic handling of water after collection, household water treatment and storage (HWTS) products have been viewed as important mechanisms for increasing access to safe water. Although studies have shown that HWTS technologies can reduce the likelihood of diarrheal illness by about 30%, levels of adoption and continued use remain low. An understanding of household preferences for HWTS products can be used to create demand through effective product positioning and social marketing, and ultimately improve and ensure commercial sustainability and scalability of these products. However, there has been little systematic research on consumer preferences for HWTS products. This paper reports the results of the first state-of-the-art conjoint analysis study of HWTS products. In 2008, we conducted a conjoint analysis survey of a representative sample of households in Andhra Pradesh (AP), India to elicit and quantify household preferences for commercial HWTS products. Controlling for attribute non-attendance in an error components mixed logit model, the study results indicate that the most important features to respondents, in terms of the effect on utility, were the type of product, followed by the extent to which the product removes pathogens, the retail outlet and, the time required to treat 10 L. Holding all other product attributes constant, filters were preferred to combination products and chemical additives. Department stores and weekly markets were the most favorable sales outlets, followed by mobile salespeople. In general, households do not prefer to purchase HWTS products at local shops. Our results can inform the types of products and sales outlets that are likely to be successful in commercial HWTS markets in AP, as well as the influence of different pricing and financing strategies on product demand and uptake.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Water Purification/methods , Adult , Choice Behavior , Commerce , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , India , Male , Water Purification/economics
3.
J Health Commun ; 16(3): 245-63, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21128150

ABSTRACT

Legal, procedural, and institutional restrictions on safe abortion services-such as laws forbidding the practice or policies preventing donors from supporting groups who provide legal services-remain a major access barrier for women worldwide. However, even when abortion services are legal, women face social and cultural barriers to accessing safe abortion services and preventing unwanted pregnancy. Interpersonal communication interventions play an important role in overcoming these obstacles, including as part of broad educational- and behavioral-change efforts. This article presents results from an interpersonal communication behavior change pilot intervention, Dialogues for Life, undertaken in Nepal from 2004 to 2006, after abortion was legalized in 2002. The project aimed to encourage and enable women to prevent unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions and was driven by dialogue groups and select community events. The authors' results confirm that a dialogue-based interpersonal communication intervention can help change behavior and that this method is feasible in a low-resource, low-literacy setting. Dialogue groups play a key role in addressing sensitive and stigmatizing health issues such as unsafe abortion and in empowering women to negotiate for the social support they need when making decisions about their health.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Communication , Professional-Patient Relations , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Legal , Adolescent , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Middle Aged , Nepal , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Power, Psychological , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Unplanned , Program Evaluation , Social Support , Young Adult
4.
Reprod Health Matters ; 17(33): 120-32, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19523589

ABSTRACT

An assessment of abortion outcomes and costs to the health care system in Mexico City was conducted in 2005 at a mix of public and private facilities prior to the legalisation of abortion. Data were obtained from hospital staff, administrative records and patients. Direct cost estimates included personnel, drugs, disposable supplies, and medical equipment for inducing abortion or treating incomplete abortions and other complications. Indirect patient costs for travel, childcare and lost wages were also estimated. The average cost per abortion with dilatation and curettage was 143 US dollars. For manual vacuum aspiration it was 111 US dollars in three public hospitals and 53 US dollars at a private clinic. The average cost of medical abortion with misoprostol alone was 79 US dollars. The average cost of treating severe abortion complications at the public hospitals ranged from 601 US dollars to over 2,100 US dollars. Increasing access to manual vacuum aspiration and early abortion with misoprostol could reduce government costs by 62%, with potential savings of up to 1.6 million US dollars per year. Reducing complications by improving access to safe services in outpatient settings would further reduce the costs of abortion care, with significant benefits both to Mexico's health care system and women seeking abortion. Additional research is needed to explore whether cost savings have been realised post-legalisation.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/economics , Abortion, Induced/standards , Cost Savings , Female , Financing, Personal , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Research , Humans , Mexico , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome
5.
Reprod Health Matters ; 13(26): 84-92, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16291489

ABSTRACT

In Latin America, where restrictive laws limit women's access to safe abortion services, misoprostol is being used to induce abortions, often without correct information on dosage or regimens. This study in an unnamed Latin American country aimed to identify appropriate channels through which instructions on misoprostol use could be disseminated to women. In-depth interviews were carried out with physicians, pharmacy staff, women who had had safe abortions and women from the community, as well as focus group discussions with advocates of safe abortion. Participants considered physicians to be the most appropriate source of information and for ensuring confidentiality for both women and provider. Participants considered midwives, pharmacists and women's groups as appropriate referral points, but not providers of information. Legal restrictions and professional risk were the primary reasons why pharmacists rejected this role, though many are selling misoprostol. There was a general lack of information about misoprostol for medical abortion among both health professionals and women. Accurate information about misoprostol use for a wide range of gynaecologic and obstetric purposes, including induced abortion, could be incorporated into training and educational materials for physicians, midwives and other appropriate mid-level providers, as well as pharmacists. Without these alternative information channels, access to information would be severely restricted, especially in rural areas.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/pharmacology , Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol/pharmacology , Patient Education as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Latin America , Middle Aged , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...