Physiotherapists' knowledge, attitude and practice behavior to prevent chronification in patients with non-specific, non-traumatic, acute- and subacute neck pain: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore physiotherapists' knowledge, attitude, and practice behavior in assessing and managing patients with non-specific, non-traumatic, acute- and subacute neck pain, with a focus on prognostic factors for chronification. METHOD: A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews was conducted with 13 physiotherapists working in primary care. A purposive sampling method served to seek the broadest perspectives. The knowledge-attitude and practice framework was used as an analytic lens throughout the process. Textual data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach and constant comparison. RESULTS: Seven main themes emerged from the data; physiotherapists self-estimated knowledge and attitude, role clarity, therapeutic relationship, internal- and external barriers to practice behavior, physiotherapists' practice behaviors, and self-reflection. These findings are presented in an adjusted knowledge-attitude and practice behavior framework. CONCLUSION: A complex relationship was found between a physiotherapist's knowledge about, attitude, and practice behavior concerning the diagnostic process and interventions for non-specific, non-traumatic, acute, and subacute neck pain. Overall, physiotherapists used a biopsychosocial view of patients with non-specific neck pain. Physiotherapists' practice behaviors was influenced by individual attitudes towards their professional role and therapeutic relationship with the patient, and individual knowledge and skills, personal routines and habits, the feeling of powerlessness to modify patients' external factors, and patients' lack of willingness to a biopsychosocial approach influenced physiotherapists' clinical decisions. In addition, we found self-reflection to have an essential role in developing self-estimated knowledge and change in attitude towards their therapeutic role and therapist-patient relationship.

Pain-related fear in adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain: process evaluation of an interdisciplinary graded exposure program.

BACKGROUND: For studying the effectiveness of treatment, it is important to check whether a new treatment is performed as originally described in the study-protocol. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an interdisciplinary graded exposure program, for adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain reporting pain-related fear, was performed according to protocol, and whether it is feasible to implement the program in rehabilitation care. METHODS: A process evaluation where quantitative and qualitative data on participant characteristics (adolescents, parents and therapists), attendance and participants' opinion on the program were collected, by means of registration forms, questionnaires and group interviews. To evaluate treatment fidelity, audio and video recordings of program sessions were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty adolescents were offered the program, of which 23 started the program. Adolescents attended on average 90% of the sessions. At least one parent per adolescent participated in the program. Analysis of 20 randomly selected recordings of treatment sessions revealed that treatment fidelity was high, since 81% of essential treatment elements were offered to the adolescents. The program was considered client-centered by adolescents and family-centered by parents. Treatment teams wished to continue offering the program in their center. CONCLUSION: The interdisciplinary graded exposure program was performed largely according to protocol, and therapists, adolescents and their parents had a favorable opinion on the program. Implementation of the program in rehabilitation care is considered feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02181725 (7 February 2014).

Anxiety affects disability and quality of life in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is known to negatively affect psychosocial functioning as expressed by enhanced levels of anxiety and depression. The aim of this study was to specify diabetes and pain-related fears. METHODS: This questionnaire-based cross-sectional study included 154 patients with PDN (mean age 65.7 ± 6.6 years). Correlation analyses corrected for age, gender, pain intensity, pain duration and insulin treatment were performed to assess the associations of fear of hypoglycaemia (Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey, HFS), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK), fear of pain (Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale, PASS-20), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-I, FES-I), fear of fatigue (Tampa Scale of Fatigue, TSF) and fear of negative evaluation (Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, BFNE), with quality of life (QoL) (Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire, Diabetic Neuropathy Version, QOL-DN) and disability (Pain Disability Index, PDI), respectively. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, all fears were independently associated with QOL-DN and PDI (p < 0.001 for all variables). Linear regression models including all fears and confounders, showed that pain intensity, pain duration and FES-I were significantly associated with QOL-DN (R2  = 0.603). Pain intensity, male gender and FES-I were significantly associated with PDI (R2  = 0.526). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for confounders, levels of pain intensity, duration of pain and fear of falling were negatively associated with QoL in patients with PDN. Pain intensity, male gender and fear of falling were positively associated with disability. Specifying fears enables us to identify potential targets for behavioural interventions that aim to improve psychosocial well-being in patients with PDN. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that patients with PDN suffer from various fears, which should enable us to design a treatment strategy that directly targets these fears, hereby improving physical and psychosocial well-being in these patients.

The fidelity of treatment delivery can be assessed in treatment outcome studies: a successful illustration from behavioral medicine.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment outcome studies ought to assess the fidelity of their treatments, including treatment delivery, but practical guidelines and examples for this are lacking. Based on general recommendations in available literature, this study proposes and illustrates the design and application of a Method of Assessing Treatment Delivery (MATD) in a behavioral medicine trial comparing two treatments for chronic low back pain. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In designing MATD, two experts identified several feasible treatment elements. Agreement between the experts in classifying these elements into five categories (essential and unique, essential but not unique, unique but not essential, compatible, prohibited) was assessed. In applying MATD, treatment recordings were evaluated by two independent raters, who coded the (non)-occurrence of MATD elements and who categorized each session as belonging to one of the two treatments. RESULTS: MATDs content validity was supported by adequate agreement between the experts' classifications of the treatment elements. MATDs interrater reliability was good. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive illustrations of designing and applying MATD may encourage the verification of treatment delivery as a partial reflection of treatment fidelity in forthcoming treatment outcome studies.