Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opinion on Designation of Adverse and Nonadverse Histopathological Findings in Toxicity Studies: The Pathologist's Dilemma.

In this opinion piece, we discuss some proposed principles for designating adversity and nonadversity of histopathological changes. The suggested approach categorizes the classes of findings noted in toxicity studies with illustrations and examples and suggests adversity or nonadversity for each class, in the authors' opinions, with rationales. Although the suggestions and examples offered in this opinion piece are generally in agreement with Society of Toxicologic Pathology best practices guideline on adversity, the authors suggest and highlight occasional divergences and differences of opinion. This is because making an adversity call is a complex and challenging topic that is difficult to simplify. Some of the challenges in deciding on adversity are discussed, especially those related to making an adversity call on a histopathological finding in isolation, based on the nature and extent of severity. The authors demonstrate some of these situations with examples. Finally, the authors suggest, in contrast to the guidelines, occasional use of a separate category for findings that are less easily classified. *This is an opinion article submitted to the Toxicologic Pathology Forum. It represents the views of the author(s). It does not constitute an official position of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology, British Society of Toxicological Pathology, or European Society of Toxicologic Pathology, and the views expressed might not reflect the best practices recommended by these Societies. This article should not be construed to represent the policies, positions, or opinions of their respective organizations, employers, or regulatory agencies.

Spontaneous renal tumors in two rats from a thirteen week rodent feeding study with grain from molecular stacked trait lepidopteran and coleopteran resistant (DP-ØØ4114-3) maize.

A thirteen week feeding study was conducted by feeding young adult male and female Sprague Dawley [Crl:CD®(SD)] rats diets containing grain from genetically modified (GM) DP-ØØ4114-3 maize that was either untreated (4114) or treated in the field with glufosinate ammonium (4114GLU). Control rats were fed diets containing the same concentration of near isogenic, non-GM maize grain (091) or one of three types of commercially available non-GM maize grain. At the end of the in-life phase, renal tubule tumors were reported in two male rats consuming diets containing 4114 maize grain. An expert panel of pathologists was convened as a Pathology Working Group (PWG) to review coded kidney histology sections from control (091) and treated (4114 and 4114GLU) male rats. The objectives were for the panel to characterize the histopathologic findings and to interpret their relationship to consumption of the indicated diet. The PWG concluded unanimously that the kidney tumors were characteristic of amphophilic-vacuolar (AV) tumors and AV atypical tubular hyperplasia which represent a distinctive phenotype that has been reported to occur sporadically in young Sprague Dawley Rats. The PWG determined that the neoplasms and atypical tubular hyperplasias were multicentric and bilateral which typifies tumors of familial origin. Degenerative/regenerative or cytotoxic changes consistent with nephrotoxicity leading to tumor induction were not observed in these rats and thus supports the conclusion that tumors were unrelated to consumption of the test diet. It was the unanimous opinion of the PWG that the proliferative renal tubule cell lesions were spontaneous and not related to consumption of diets containing 4114 maize grain.

Early occurrence of spontaneous tumors in CD-1 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

It is sometimes difficult to assess the relevance of tumors that occur in treated animals in short-term studies. This report is intended to establish a general profile of tumor occurrence in young control CD-1 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats. Data from 20 rat and 20 mouse carcinogenicity studies conducted between 1990 and 2002 at Huntingdon Life Sciences, UK. were collected and evaluated. The route of administration was either dietary oral gavage, and the analysis was confined to sporadic deaths (decedents) in control groups occurring during the first 50 weeks of study. In addition, tumor occurrence between 50-80 weeks were compared. In mice, the most common tumor was lymphoma, followed by bronchiolo-alveolar adenoma. In rats, the most common tumor was adenoma of the pituitary gland, followed by mammary fibroadenoma, and adenocarcinoma. When studies of up to 50 weeks, between 50 and 80 weeks, and at 2-year termination were compared, there was no great difference in tumor occurrence except in male rats, in which the most common tumor up to 50 weeks on study was lymphoma, whereas the most common tumor between 50-80 weeks and at 2 years was pituitary adenoma.