ABSTRACT
Introduction Ankle fractures are common injuries in orthopaedic practice. Open reduction with internal fixation is the main line of management of displaced ankle fractures in fit patients. The study aims to analyse the complications, re-operation rate and cost difference between one-third tubular and locking plates which are the most frequently used constructs in lateral malleolus fractures. Materials and methods The total number of presented ankle fractures from April to August during the years 2015, 2017 and 2019 to our Tertiary Hospital in the United Kingdom were screened. Data including operative fixation, plate used, complication rates, the need for revision surgery and metalwork removal were collected from the hospital's electronic Virtual Trauma Board. Patients who had less than one-year follow-up were excluded. Results A total of 174 patients were included which represents more than half of presented ankle fractures (56%) with a decline in the mean age of operated patients from 56.4 in 2015 to 46.2 in 2019. The majority of fixation used tubular plates (n=122) versus (n=52) for locking plates. Locking plate fixation doubled from 10 in 2015 to 23 in 2019. However, they only contributed to 27% of the total operated ankle fractures. Despite the initial higher complications and removal rates of locking plates in 2015 (P<0.042 and P<0.038 respectively), there was no significant difference in overall complications, revision rates, and metalwork removal between locking plates and tubular plates (p=0.084, FEp= 0.158 and p=0.096 respectively). There was an estimated extra cost of £15938.60 for the use of locking plates during the study timeline. Conclusion There was no significant difference in overall complications, revision surgery and metalwork removal between tubular and locking plates in treating lateral malleolus fractures despite the significantly higher cost of locking constructs. Further studies are needed to illustrate the trend and cost-effective analysis of the tubular and locking plates in treating ankle fractures.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: Inflammatory cytokines produced at the site of disc herniation are considered as pain generators in patients with lumbar disc disease. Whether a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) assay can be used in order to predict the quantum of inflammation surrounding nerve roots is a matter of investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the association of hs-CRP level and functional outcomes measured by the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODY) before and after epidural steroid injection (ESI) in patients with lumbar disc disease. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although many studies examining the role of hs-CRP levels and lumbar pain have been published previously, the results are equivocal, and there is no clear consensus regarding which patients will benefit from an ESI. METHODS: This was a prospective study, with 77 patients in the study group and 23 participants in the control group. Baseline hs-CRP levels were obtained for both groups. Study group patients received a single ESI and were subjected to detailed pre- and postprocedure evaluation using MODY scores. For this group, hs-CRP levels were measured at 1 and 2 months after injection. RESULTS: Out of 77 patients, 52 had acute and 25 had chronic low back pain. Thirty-six patients with acute pain obtained significant improvement, while 16 had an insignificant response to the ESI. None of the chronic cases had a significant response. The mean baseline hs-CRP (mg/L) among the study group (29.83±10.43) was significantly higher than for the controls (10.26±2.783). The baseline hs-CRP among acute cases, where post ESI MODY score at 2 months had significant reduction, was 32.19±5.126, and those with insignificant reduction was 18.13±7.949 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline hs-CRP levels can be used to prognosticate the outcome following ESI in patients with acute lumbar disc disease, with radicular pain refractory to physiotherapy and analgesics.
