Can academic dentistry become an anti-racist institution?: Addressing racial battle fatigue and building belonging.

Racism, oppression, and marginalization are unfortunate hallmarks that Black individuals face in the United States. While dental schools serve as institutions of both learning and patient care, applying humanistic principles, they are not immune to racism, specifically anti-Black racism. In this paper, the theoretical framework of racial battle fatigue is applied to academic dentistry to consider how it may impact faculty who have experiences with racism and discrimination. The framework of racial battle fatigue allows for a critique of academic dentistry as an institution that may be toxic, neither welcoming Black faculty members nor supporting their professional and career advancement, despite accreditation standards that call on these institutions to be humanistic environments for diversity and inclusion. Black faculty members may face unique challenges in academic dentistry because of racial battle fatigue. The cumulative stress may warrant unique strategies to both recruit and retain them in academic dental institutions. Specifically, pathways may need to be funded to insure that they have support and time allocations for professional development and career promotion. With understanding the effects of racial battle fatigue, dental schools may want to adopt policies and practices that support the professional and personal well-being and success of faculty, especially those faculty members who are Black.

Silver Diamine Fluoride Staining is Acceptable for Posterior Primary Teeth and Is Preferred Over Advanced Pharmacologic Behavior Management by Many Parents.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Parental perceptions and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride staining. Crystal YO, Janal MN, Hamilton DS, Niederman R. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148(7):510-8. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Grant from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), National Institutes of Health; New York University Clinical and Translational Science Award; and National Center for Advancing Translational Science, National Institutes of Health TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Cross-sectional.

A Clinical Validation of Self-Reported Periodontitis Among Participants in the Black Women's Health Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the validity of self-report of periodontal disease in African Americans. The Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), a United States national cohort study of 59,000 black women followed via mailed questionnaires since 1995, offered the opportunity to clinically validate self-reported periodontitis among a sample of participants. METHODS: Oral health questionnaires were sent to study participants residing in Massachusetts. Respondents living in the Boston metro area were invited for clinical examination. Self-reports were compared with clinical data obtained from the 77 women (mean age: 59 years) who were examined. The authors examined the predictive ability of individual and combined questionnaire items with respect to clinical periodontal disease severity. Validation parameters were calculated for each question, and receiver operating characteristic statistics were generated to compare questionnaire items. RESULTS: Periodontitis prevalence in the validation sample was 24% for severe periodontitis and 61% for moderate disease. Performance of individual questionnaire items with respect to predicting periodontitis was better for severe compared with moderate disease. Combinations of questionnaire items improved the predictive ability with respect to severe disease beyond that of individual questionnaire items. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of severe periodontitis was similar to other age-comparable populations, without regard for race or sex, whereas prevalence of total periodontitis (moderate and severe) among women of similar age and/or race was much higher. Predictive ability of questionnaire items assessed in the BWHS was similar to that in other studies.