In vitro and in vivo induction of fetal hemoglobin with a reversible and selective DNMT1 inhibitor.

Pharmacological induction of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) expression is an effective therapeutic strategy for the management of beta-hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease. DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors 5-azacytidine (5-aza) and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) have been shown to induce fetal hemoglobin expression in both preclinical models and clinical studies, but are not currently approved for the management of hemoglobinopathies. We report here the discovery of a novel class of orally bioavailable DNMT1-selective inhibitors as exemplified by GSK3482364. This molecule potently inhibits the methyltransferase activity of DNMT1, but not DNMT family members DNMT3A or DNMT3B. In contrast with cytidine analog DNMT inhibitors, the DNMT1 inhibitory mechanism of GSK3482364 does not require DNA incorporation and is reversible. In cultured human erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs), GSK3482364 decreased overall DNA methylation resulting in de-repression of the gamma globin genes HBG1 and HBG2 and increased HbF expression. In a transgenic mouse model of sickle cell disease, orally administered GSK3482364 caused significant increases in both HbF levels and in the percentage HbF-expressing erythrocytes, with good overall tolerability. We conclude that in these preclinical models, selective, reversible inhibition of DNMT1 is sufficient for the induction of HbF, and is well-tolerated. We anticipate that GSK3482364 will be a useful tool molecule for the further study of selective DNMT1 inhibition both in vitro and in vivo.

A hit deconstruction approach for the discovery of fetal hemoglobin inducers.

Beta-hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease represent a major global unmet medical need. De-repression of fetal hemoglobin in erythrocytes is a clinically validated approach for the management of sickle cell disease, but the only FDA-approved medicine for this purpose has limitations to its use. We conducted a phenotypic screen in human erythroid progenitor cells to identify molecules with the ability to de-repress fetal hemoglobin, which resulted in the identification of the benzoxaborole-containing hit compound 1. This compound was found to have modest cellular potency and lead-like pharmacokinetics, but no identifiable SAR to enable optimization. Systematic deconstruction of a closely related analog of 1 revealed the fragment-like carboxylic acid 12, which was then optimized to provide tetrazole 31, which had approximately 100-fold improved cellular potency compared to 1, high levels of oral exposure in rats, and excellent solubility.

Development of phenotypic screening assays for γ-globin induction using primary human bone marrow day 7 erythroid progenitor cells.

Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a genetic disorder of the ß-globin gene. SCA results in chronic ischemia with pain and tissue injury. The extent of SCA symptoms can be ameliorated by treatment with drugs, which result in increasing the levels of γ-globin in patient red blood cells. Hydroxyurea (HU) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for SCA, but it has dose-limiting toxicity, and patients exhibit highly variable treatment responses. To identify compounds that may lead to the development of better and safer medicines, we have established a method using primary human bone marrow day 7 erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) to screen for compounds that induce γ-globin production. First, human marrow CD34(+) cells were cultured and expanded for 7 days and characterized for the expression of erythroid differentiation markers (CD71, CD36, and CD235a). Second, fresh or cryopreserved EPCs were treated with compounds for 3 days in 384-well plates followed by γ-globin quantification by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which was validated using HU and decitabine. From the 7408 compounds screened, we identified at least one new compound with confirmed γ-globin-inducing activity. Hits are undergoing analysis in secondary assays. In this article, we describe the method of generating fit-for-purpose EPCs; the development, optimization, and validation of the ELISA and secondary assays for γ-globin detection; and screening results.

Immune function tests for hazard identification: a paradigm shift in drug development.

Routine immune function testing in preclinical drug development was established as a regulatory requirement in June of 2000 under the Committee of Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Note for Guidance on Repeated Dose Toxicity (CPMP/SWP/1042/99). The purpose of the more stringent approach to immunotoxicology testing was to better identify unintended immunosuppression; however, the requirement was met with much discussion and debate. At the center of the discussion was an attempt to reconcile opposing regulatory directives from agencies outside of Europe that adhere to a more selective, weight-of-evidence approach to functional evaluations. Uncertainty over the predictive value of the recommended immune function tests relative to conventional toxicology parameters prompted an investigation by the International Committee on Harmonization (ICH). The results of a preliminary, industry-wide survey indicated that only a low percentage of pharmaceuticals adversely affect immune function without alterations to standard toxicology parameters. Expected ICH guidelines will ultimately determine to what extent and for what purpose immune function tests will be conducted. In the meantime, optimization of the recommended immune function tests is ongoing. The T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR) by either conventional Sheep Red Blood Cell (SRBC) plaque assay or by the modified ELISA method using either SRBC or keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as antigen is being extensively evaluated to determine best practices and procedures for preclinical immunotoxicity evaluations. This review addresses some aspects of the debate concerning the appropriateness of immune function tests for hazard identification, along with recommendations for optimizing TDAR methodology to ensure adequate sensitivity and predictability in risk assessments for immunotoxicity.

Adequate immunotoxicity testing in drug development.

Modulation of the immune system can lead to either immunostimulation or immunosuppression and can be either intended or unintended. While many effects on the immune system's components can be found as a result of a drug treatment or chemical exposure, true immunotoxicity occurs when such treatment results in adverse effects or defects in the immune response. Regulatory expectations to evaluate potential adverse effects of pharmaceuticals warrants a need for reliable and readily standardized methods. Moreover, criteria to classify a drug as an "immunotoxicant" need to be established. Examples of studies using a modified approach to measure T-cell-dependent antibody responses (the rat KLH model) and interpretation of the results in the context of immunotoxicity evaluation are discussed in this paper.

Primary antibody response to keyhole limpet hemocyanin in rat as a model for immunotoxicity evaluation.

To address current regulatory expectations on immunotoxicity testing of new chemicals, we describe an animal model that measures the primary antibody response to the T-cell dependent antigen, keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Single immunization with KLH by either footpad (300microg/rat) or intravenous (300microg/kg) route in Sprague Dawley rats resulted in increased germinal center formation in the spleen and a robust anti-KLH IgM (70-388microg/ml) and IgG (230-470microg/ml) antibody response with peak detection on Days 5 and 14 post-immunization, respectively. Subcutaneous immunization with KLH (300microg/kg) resulted in a much weaker anti-KLH IgM and IgG (< or =20microg/ml) antibody response with no detectable increase in splenic germinal center formation. The utility of a rat KLH immunization model in detecting immunosuppression was evaluated with the known immunosuppressive drugs: cyclosporin, azathioprine and prednisolone. Rats, treated with drug at a maximum tolerated dose, were immunized with KLH by footpad or intravenous injection and serum samples were collected at various intervals up to 2 weeks post-immunization. Additional study parameters included terminal body weight, hematology and/or histopathology. All three drugs inhibited the IgM (60%) and IgG (> or =90%) antibody responses in the absence of overt toxicity based on evaluation of the standard toxicology parameters. In conclusion, measurement of a rat primary antibody response to KLH by ELISA is a reliable and readily standardized method for assessing immunotoxicity of pharmaceuticals.

Immunopharmacology of recombinant human interleukin-18 in non-human primates.

Recombinant human interleukin (IL)-18 (rHuIL-18) has a potential as a therapeutic agent in cancer and is currently in drug development. Since human IL-18 displays 96% and 100% amino acid sequence homology with cynomolgus monkey and chimpanzee IL-18, respectively, the biological responses to rHuIL-18 were evaluated in these species. A single intravenous dose of rHuIL-18 at 1 or 10mg/kg in cymonolgus monkeys caused a transient reduction in lymphocyte counts, induction of IL-1alpha and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) mRNA in whole blood cells and a marked increase in plasma neopterin. rHuIL-18 administered to cynomolgus monkeys at doses of 0.3 or 3mg/kg for two 5-day cycles (Days 1-5 and 15-19) resulted in increased monocyte counts, induction of NK cells and concomitant increases in plasma IL-12 and neopterin. Administration of repeat doses of rHuIL-18 at 10mg/kg to chimpanzees was associated with increased monocyte counts, upregulation of FcgammaRI surface expression on monocytes, and increased IL-8, IL-12 and neopterin in plasma. These studies demonstrate, for the first time, the immunostimulatory activity of rHuIL-18 in vivo. The described pharmacological profile of rHuIL-18 in both cynomolgus monkeys and chimpanzees is indicative of the immunotherapeutic potential of rHuIL-18 in the treatment of cancer.