Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cell Transplant ; 14(8): 595-605, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16355568

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic islet transplantation into type 1 diabetic patients is currently being performed by intraportal infusion. This method, albeit reproducible, has some disadvantages including potential development of portal hypertension, hemorrhage, and an inability to retrieve or detect the transplanted tissue. Other transplant sites have been examined in animal models including the omentum, peritoneal cavity, and the spleen. A transplant site that has not been successful in supporting functional islet tissue transplantation in humans is the subcutaneous space due primarily to the lack of a well-defined vascular bed. This site has many favorable characteristics such as ease of access for transplantation and potential for removal of the transplanted tissue with a minimally invasive surgical procedure. This report addresses the evaluation of a subcutaneously placed device for the support of rat syngeneic islet transplantation in a streptozocin-induced diabetic model. The data generated support the use of this device for islet engraftment. In addition, beta cell function in this device compared favorably with the function of islets transplanted to the renal subcapsular space as well as islets within the native pancreas.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/therapy , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Animals , Female , Male , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
2.
Transplantation ; 77(8): 1269-75, 2004 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15114097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Historically, antibody induction has been used because of the higher immunologic risk of graft loss or rejection observed in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation compared with kidney transplantation alone. This trial was designed to assess the effect of antibody induction in SPK transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Induction agents included T-cell-depleting and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies. METHODS: A total of 174 SPK transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, multi-center study. They were randomized to induction (n=87) or non-induction (n=87) groups and followed for 3 years. RESULTS: At 3 years, actual patient (94.3% and 89.7%) and pancreas (75.9% and 75.9%) survivals were similar between the induction and non-induction groups, respectively. Actual kidney survival was similar at 1 and 2 years, but at 3 years, it was significantly better in the induction group compared with the non-induction group (92% vs. 81.6%; P =0.04). At 3 years, median serum creatinine and hemoglobin A1C were similar between the induction and non-induction groups (1.35 mg/dL and 1.20 mg/dL, 5.4% and 5.5%, respectively). Three-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed, treated acute kidney rejection in the induction and non-induction groups was 19.5% and 27.5% (P =0.14), respectively, with odds 4.6 times greater in African Americans regardless of treatment (P =0.004). Significantly higher rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and CMV syndrome occurred in those receiving T-cell-depleting antibody induction (36.1%) when compared with those receiving anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (2%) and non-induction (8.1%) (P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids resulted in excellent safety and efficacy in SPK transplant recipients. Actual 3-year kidney survival was significantly better in the induction group; however, CMV viremia and CMV syndrome rates were significantly higher in the T-cell-depleting antibody group. African Americans demonstrated a significantly greater risk of acute rejection despite antibody induction. Decisions regarding the use of induction therapy must weigh the risk of kidney graft loss or rejection against the risk of infection.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Pancreas Transplantation/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Female , Graft Survival/drug effects , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphocyte Depletion , Male , Prospective Studies , Receptors, Interleukin-2/immunology , Time Factors
3.
Am J Transplant ; 3(7): 855-64, 2003 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12814477

ABSTRACT

A randomized, multicenter, prospective study was conducted at 18 pancreas transplant centers in the United States to determine the role of induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. One hundred and 74 recipients were enrolled: 87 recipients each in the induction and noninduction treatment arms. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival at 1-year. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any treated biopsy-confirmed or presumptive rejection episodes (kidney or pancreas) in the induction and noninduction treatment arms was 24.6% and 31.2% (p = 0.28), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed, treated, acute kidney allograft rejection in the induction and noninduction treatment arms was 13.1% and 23.0% (p = 0.08), respectively. Biopsy-confirmed kidney allograft rejection occurred later post-transplant and appeared to be less severe among recipients that received induction therapy. The highest rate of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia/syndrome was observed in the subgroup of recipients who received T-cell depleting antibody induction and received organs from CMV serologically positive donors. Decisions regarding the routine use of induction therapy in SPK transplantation must take into consideration its differential effects on risk of rejection and infection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/pharmacology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunization, Passive/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Kidney Transplantation , Pancreas Transplantation , Humans , Lymphocytes/immunology
4.
Transplantation ; 75(5): 613-8, 2003 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12640298

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The testis is an immunoprivileged organ, and at 37 degrees C, the intratesticular microenvironment supports the survival of allogeneic islets. The objective of this study was to determine whether the immunoprotection afforded by the intratesticular environment is potent enough to prevent the rejection of xenogeneic porcine islets in a large-animal model. METHODS: A bilateral cryptorchid condition was surgically created in sexually mature beagle dogs. Porcine islets were prepared from neonatal pigs by collagenase digestion and 9 days of culture, after which they were injected into each of the cryptorchid testes. Control dogs received liver subcapsular space transplants of porcine islets and autologous islets. After 100 days, the testes and relevant portions of liver were studied immunohistochemically for the presence of islet tissue. RESULTS: The testicular interstitial space of all dogs contained abundant islet tissue. No evidence of lymphocytic infiltration or inflammation was observed. In contrast, porcine islets transplanted to the liver subcapsular space do not survive, although autologous islets engraft well in that position. This occurs even though the recipient's serum contains preformed cytotoxic antibodies to porcine islets that persist after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the microenvironment existing within the surgically repositioned intra-abdominal testis supports the survival of xenogeneic tissue. The survival of xenogeneic tissue in the absence of immunosuppression in this large-animal model raises the possibility that xenogeneic porcine islet tissue will also survive in humans if transplanted into a similar environment.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Testis/surgery , Transplantation, Heterologous , Transplantation, Heterotopic , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Control Groups , Cryptorchidism/physiopathology , Cryptorchidism/surgery , Dogs , Female , Immunosuppression Therapy , Islets of Langerhans/pathology , Liver/surgery , Male , Surgically-Created Structures , Swine , Testis/pathology , Testis/physiopathology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...