ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy, delaying or refusing to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines, impedes the progress of achieving optimal HPV vaccine coverage. Little is known about the sources of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine hesitancy among racially/ethnically and geographically diverse communities. The purpose of this paper is to explore HPV vaccine hesitancy among rural, Slavic, and Latino communities that reside in counties with low HPV vaccine uptake rates. METHODS: Key informant interviews and focus groups were conducted with rural, Slavic, and Latino communities that reside within counties in California that have low HPV vaccine up to date rates (16-25%). Qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of seven focus groups and 14 key informant interviews were conducted with 39 individuals from seven California counties. Salient themes that contributed to HPV vaccine hesitancy included the following: social media and the anti-vaccination movement; a strong belief in acquiring immunity naturally; prior vaccine experiences; and vaccine timing concerns. Participants suggested the provision of culturally appropriate, in-language, in-person easy to understand HPV vaccine education to mitigate HPV vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can inform future interventions to increase HPV vaccine uptake among hesitant communities.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Geographic disparities exist in uptake of the human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). In 2020, the National Immunization Survey-Teen reported that adolescents living in nonmetropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) had lower HPV vaccination coverage (≥ 1 dose) compared to adolescents living in MSA principal cities. This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a multilevel pilot intervention study to increase uptake of the HPV vaccine among adolescent patients ages 11-17 of a rural health clinic. METHODS: This parent, primary care team, and clinic multilevel pilot intervention was guided by evidence-based approaches to increase HPV vaccinations, formative research, and input from the community. HPV vaccination initiation and completion rates were analyzed at baseline and 23 months follow-up. FINDINGS: The proportion of adolescent patients ages 11-17 who had initiated the HPV vaccine series was significantly greater at follow-up compared to baseline, (82.7% compared to 52.4%), χ2 (1, n = 498) = 49.2, P < .0001. The proportion of adolescent patients ages 11-17 who had completed the HPV vaccine series was also significantly greater at follow-up compared to baseline, (58.0% compared to 27.0%), χ2 (1, n = 498) = 50.8, P < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: The multilevel intervention significantly increased HPV initiation and completion rates among adolescent patients ages 11-17 at this rural health clinic. This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing a multilevel intervention to address low HPV vaccination rates among rural adolescents and the potential of employing this strategy for a large-scale randomizing-controlled trial.
