ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.757283.].
ABSTRACT
Reluctance to accept vaccination against COVID-19 poses a significant public health risk and is known to be a multi-determined phenomenon. We conducted online focus groups, or "bulletin boards," in order to probe the nature of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its implications. Participants were 94 individuals from three distinct U.S. geographical areas and represented a range of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Six themes emerged from the 3 day-long bulletin boards: the most trusted source of health information sought is the personal physician; information about health is nevertheless obtained from a wide variety of sources; stories about adverse side effects are especially "sticky"; government health institutions like CDC and FDA are not trusted; most respondents engaged in individualistic reasoning; and there is a wide spectrum of attitudes toward vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination HesitancyABSTRACT
HIV/AIDS is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Africa, and rates of retention in treatment are low. Some research has shown that mobile clinics are effective in connecting people in rural areas with health care. We compared HIV outcomes between HIV-positive patients who chose to access treatment from a regional hospital to those who chose care in one of four semi-mobile clinics closer to where they live. The subjects for this analysis were HIV-positive residents in West Pokot accessing care at one of four semi-mobile sites (Kabichbich, Chepareria, Kacheliba, and Sigor) or at the regional hospital in Kapenguria. We examined four outcome variables between the two groups: (1) retention in HIV treatment, (2) change in CD4 count, (3) adherence to ARVs, and (4) deaths. The patients who chose semi-mobile clinic care were less well educated, poorer, and sicker than those who chose to continue care in the regional hospital. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the four outcome measures. Although the population of patients attending semi-mobile clinics was on average poorer and sicker than those attending the hospital, their outcomes were similar. Care at the semi-mobile clinics did not result in significantly different outcomes from care in the district hospital. This program showed that semi-mobile clinics are a viable alternative to hospital care for very ill, isolated populations, but further measures must be taken to improve retention and adherence in these settings.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Mobile Health Units/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , HIV Infections/mortality , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rural PopulationABSTRACT
As 2015 quickly approaches, we have been made increasingly aware of our progress toward Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, one MDG has been particularly recalcitrant to progress: MDG 5, namely, improving maternal health. Few countries are on track to achieve the first part of MDG 5's goals, reducing maternal mortality by 75%. This article addresses the key priority issues of maternal health as part of sexual and reproductive health issues and maternal health and communicable diseases. It argues that only an integrative approach to the twin challenges of HIV and maternal mortality can help reduce devastatingly high rates of maternal deaths worldwide, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. The article reenvisions the MDGs not as separate, independent tasks, but as related, cohesive issues for which a holistic approach is needed. New causes of the relationship between HIV and maternal mortality are considered, and possible solutions are broached.
