[Changes in medical treatment of heart failure in the light of large clinical trials]. / Come è cambiata la terapia medica dello scompenso cardiaco alla luce dei grandi trial clinici.

In the last years, the treatment of heart failure has radically changed, as has knowledge of this complex and heterogeneous clinical syndrome. This is largely due to the results of several multicenter clinical trials, which have been undertaken since the late 80's. These trials have not only contributed to the elaboration of present-day treatment protocols, but also to a better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in heart failure. In the past, heart failure was generally interpreted on the basis of pathophysiologic models according to which hemodynamic abnormalities played a very important role in determining the clinical presentation and evolution of the disease. This led to the use of digitalis, diuretics, inotropic drugs and vasodilators for the treatment of heart failure. More recently, improved knowledge of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the progression of this disease has highlighted the central role and the complexity of various neurohormonal mechanisms. Antagonism of these systems has proved to be the only strategy which favorably modifies the natural history of heart failure. The proved effectiveness of ACE-inhibitors and particularly of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction was the most convincing demonstration of the validity of this model. However, the evolution and updating of the guidelines on the treatment of heart failure should only be considered as the first step in the development of strategies aimed at extending these principles to daily clinical practice and in particular to the real patient who is different from patients typically enrolled in heart failure trials. Moreover, the development of new effective models for the management of the ever-growing number of patients with heart failure is of utmost urgency.

Predictive value of heart rate in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with metoprolol.

UNLABELLED: Predictive factors of a favourable response to beta-blocker therapy are still unknown and the role of heart rate remains controversial. AIM: To investigate the relation between heart rate and the response to chronic metoprolol treatment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with DCM, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 0.40 and blood pressure < or = 140/90 mmHg were treated with metoprolol, associated with digitalis, diuretics and ACE-inhibitors. After 24 +/- 6 months, 48 patients (49%) were classified as "improved" on the basis of a clinical/instrumental score. RESULTS: Rest, mean 24-hour and maximal exercise heart rate were all significantly and directly related to the probability of improvement, but heart rate at rest, supine and in upright position, showed the highest predictive power. The relationship between heart rate and improvement with metoprolol appeared to be non-linear, with an increasing probability in patients with higher heart rate, but with a fall of the slope in cases with extreme tachycardia. By dividing our study population on the basis of the most important clinical variables, this complex relation was evident only in patients at a more advanced stage of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms the strict relationship between heart rate and improvement with chronic metoprolol therapy in patients with DCM. This relation seems to be non-linear and is influenced by the severity of the disease.