ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the prophylactic administration of ondansetron plus droperidol, droperidol plus metoclopramide, and perphenazine to determine effects on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and sedation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 212 ASA physical status I and II adults presenting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three prophylactic antiemetic drug combinations: ondansetron 4 mg plus droperidol 0.625 mg (Group OD), droperidol 0.625 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg (Group DM), or perphenazine 5 mg (Group P). Study drugs were administered intravenously after induction of general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, weight, duration of surgery, numbers of patients receiving intraoperative atropine or ephedrine, number admitted overnight, and time to discharge home. Patients in Group P used lower total doses of opioids than did patients in Group OD. There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea, pain, or sedation scores, in numbers of patients requiring antiemetics (Group OD, 13 of 66; Group DM, 15 of 66; Group P, 14 of 68), or in numbers of patients vomiting, either in hospital or during the first postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: These three drug regimens are equivalent for antiemetic prophylaxis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Nausea/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Droperidol/administration & dosage , Droperidol/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Metoclopramide/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Perphenazine/therapeutic use , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Two hundred adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in a prospectively randomized, double-blind investigation comparing ondansetron, 4 mg (Group O) with the combination of droperidol, 0.625 mg, and metoclopramide, 10 mg (Group DM). Antiemetic drugs were administered intravenously (IV) after induction of general anesthesia (propofol, desflurane). Moderate or severe nausea in the postanesthesia care unit was treated with the cross-over drug, i.e., ondansetron for patients in Group DM or droperidol plus metoclopramide for patients in Group O. Data were analyzed using t-tests and chi 2 analyses, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The groups were similar with respect to gender, age, weight, duration of surgery, number receiving intraoperative atropine or ephedrine, number admitted over-night, and time to discharge home. Of 102 patients in Group O, 44 required antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit, compared with 24 of 98 patients in Group DM (P < 0.01). One patient (in Group DM) was admitted for persistent nausea. In conclusion, droperidol 0.625 mg IV in combination with metoclopramide 10 mg IV was more effective in preventing postoperative nausea than was ondansetron 4 mg IV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with no difference in the time to discharge.