ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite evidence of oncologic benefits from extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer from many East Asian studies, there is persistent debate over its use in the West, mainly due to perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of D2 dissection in a high-volume North American center. METHODS: A prospectively entered database of all patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer at a North American referral center from 2005 to 2016 was reviewed. Wedge resections, thoracoabdominal approach, emergency surgery, palliative operations, and non-adenocarcinoma cases were excluded. RESULTS: Of 366 non-bariatric gastrectomies over this period, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 73 years and 69% were male. One hundred forty-one patients (80%) underwent D2 dissection, the rest having D1. There was no difference in postoperative complications (D1 = 44%: D2 = 42%), anastomotic leaks (D1 = 6%: D2 = 5%), and same-admission or 30-day mortality (D1 = 6%: D2 = 2%). D2 dissection was associated with higher pathological stage (72% > stage 1 vs 38% > stage 1; p < 0.05) and median lymph node yield (30 vs 14; p < 0.05), with no difference in complete resection (R0) rate (D1 = 98% vs D2 = 92%). Laparoscopic approach was employed in 34% (45/141) of D2 cases, resulting in shorter median length of stay (6 days vs 9; p < 0.05) and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open D2. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of D2 lymphadenectomy, by either open or laparoscopic approach, in high-volume North American centers as a safe and effective oncologic procedure for gastric cancer, with equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield to traditional D1 dissection.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Dissection , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Quebec , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
The burden of surgical disease in low-income countries remains significant, in part owing to continued surgical workforce shortages. We describe a successful paradigm to expand Rwandan surgical capacity through the implementation of a surgical education partnership between the National University of Rwanda and the Centre for Global Surgery at the McGill University Health Centre. Key considerations for such a program are highlighted.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , General Surgery/education , Inservice Training/organization & administration , International Cooperation , Program Evaluation , Canada , Developing Countries , Humans , Poverty , RwandaABSTRACT
With surgical conditions being significant contributors to the global burden of disease, efforts aimed at increasing future practitioners' understanding, interest and participation in global surgery must be expanded. Unfortunately, despite the increasing popularity of global health among medical students, possibilities for exposure and involvement during medical school remain limited. By evaluating student participation in the 2011 Bethune Round Table, we explored the role that global surgery conferences can play in enhancing this neglected component of undergraduate medical education. Study results indicate high rates of student dissatisfaction with current global health teaching and opportunities, along with high indices of conference satisfaction and knowledge gain, suggesting that global health conferences can serve as important adjuncts to undergraduate medical education.
