Spine Surgery in a Geriatric Population. Is it Really Different?

OBJECTIVES: Spinal degenerative disorders are a major cause of morbidity in the elderly resulting in high dependency. Most of them have a trend to be managed conservatively considering age, comorbidities, and apprehensions of surgical complications. Surgical intervention at early stage with appropriate indications can have better outcomes rather than conservative management in fit patients. The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional outcome in geriatric patients > 60 years who have undergone various spinal procedures for degenerative spine. METHODS: The study is retrospective, which includes all cases of spinal degenerative disease operated between 2014 and 2016. They were divided into geriatric (>60 years) and non-geriatric cohorts. These include all patients undergoing spinal decompression and/or instrumentation for degenerative disorders of the spine. Patients were interviewed for their functional outcomes in the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 184 spine cases were operated upon by a single surgeon, out of which a total of 139 cases were operated for the spinal degenerative condition. Forty-eight patients underwent lumbar spinal fusion procedures, 67 underwent non-instrumented lumbar decompression, and 24 patients underwent cervical procedures. These were further divided into 65 geriatric cases and 74 non-geriatric cases. The outcome was assessed with improvement and functional outcomes for spinal disability. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that surgical intervention for spinal problems in geriatric patients is not different from the general population. The outcome is also satisfactory provided, the choice of surgical procedure as per its indication is appropriate. The usual preoperative evaluation for the geriatric age group is very important. The performance status before surgery and the comorbidities have a direct bearing on the outcome in these patients.

Quality of life after surgical clipping of ruptured aneurysms from a developing country: differential independent impact of grading scales & baseline factors.

BACKGROUND: Detailed Quality of Life(QOL) burden among patients with ruptured aneurysms has not been thoroughly studied, especially from developing countries. This is to evaluate the independent impact of factors influencing QOL following clipping. METHODS: Patients who underwent clipping for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms were prospectively studied for demography, site of aneurysm, H&H, WFNS, and Fisher grades, with QOL, assessed as per WHOQOL-BREF(range 4-20 in 4 domains), and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients underwent prospective assessment of WHOQOL-BREF at 3 months after surgery, with a median age of 48. The sites of ruptured aneurysms were anterior cerebral(139), followed by middle cerebral(MCA)(82) and internal carotid(54) arteries. In univariate analyses, H&H grade had a significant rank order correlation with physical and psychological QOL domains, while WFNS grade had no significant correlation with QOL domains. Age showed a significant correlation with the social domain. The location of the ruptured aneurysm had a significant association as well, with MCA aneurysms having better scores in the environmental domain of QOL. Multivariate analysis using the generalized linear model confirmed the independent impact of these factors on QOL. Amongst all the factors studied, the age had the strongest independent impact, followed by H&H grade, location, and Fisher grade in the order of magnitude ofWald χ2. CONCLUSIONS: Following surgical clipping of ruptured aneurysms, age has the most substantial independent impact on QOL, followed by H&H grade, while WFNS grade shows no significant correlation. MCA aneurysms have better QOL scores than the rest.