Associated autoimmunity in Type 1 Diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults: The role of glutamic-acid decarboxylase autoantibodies.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of Associated Autoimmune Diseases (AADs) in Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adults (LADA) versus autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and the role of glutamic-acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) and other factors. METHODS: Adults with autoimmune diabetes mellitus (DM) were recruited from the Diabetes Center of Nikaia-Piraeus Hospital. Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded and anti-pancreatic and organ-specific antibodies were measured. RESULTS: Of 160 patients, 33.75% had one AAD and 24.37% had two or more. Patients with LADA had higher overall prevalence of AADs, mainly autoimmune thyroiditis and gastritis. Celiac disease was present only in T1D. GADA positive patients had higher prevalence of AADs and multiple autoimmunity, especially thyroiditis and gastritis. Patients with LADA had higher rates of positive GADA or islet-cell antibodies (ICA). After controlling for LADA, GADA remained a significant predictor of AADs. Female gender and chronological age were also significant predictors of AADs. CONCLUSIONS: AADs were present in 58.13% of patients. Patients with LADA were more prone to a generalized autoimmune disorder than those with T1D. AADs development was significantly associated with female sex, older age and positive GADA, which proved an independent marker of associated autoimmunity.

Understanding what people think and feel about adult vaccinations and the associated barriers in Greece: Development and validation of the attitude towards adult vaccination (ATAVAC) scale.

Despite the unequivocal value of vaccination in reducing the global burden of infectious diseases, the anti-vaccination movement thrives. The vast majority of the existing validated tools explore attitudes regarding vaccination in children. The aim of our study was to develop and validate a scale assessing attitudes towards adult immunisation. This national cross-sectional study included adult healthcare users who visited 23 Greek Primary Healthcare Units. The development of the scale was the result of literature review, semi-structured interviews and pilot testing of its preliminary versions. The initial version contained 15 items measuring respondents' attitudes on a 6-point Likert scale. The sample was randomly split into two halves. Exploratory factor analysis, performed in the first sample, was used for the creation of multi-item scales; confirmatory factor analysis was used in the second sample to assess goodness of fit. Moreover, concurrent validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and ceiling and floor effects were explored. The total sample consisted of 1,571 individuals. Overall 'Cronbach's alpha' (0.821) indicated good internal consistency. The initial exploratory factor analysis resulted in a three-factor model. The subsequent confirmatory factor analysis indicated that an 11-item version of the scale provided the best fit of the model to the data (RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.053, TLI = 0.937, CFI = 0.955, AIC = 24,999.949). All subscales ('value of adult vaccination', 'safety concerns' and 'perceived barriers') demonstrated strong concurrent associations with participants' attitudes and behaviour regarding vaccination (p < .001). No ceiling or floor effects were noted for any of the subscales (0.13%, 2.61% and 0.51%; 0.13%, 0.57% and 0.45% respectively). The 11-item ATAVAC scale proved to be a reliable and valid tool, suitable for assessing attitudes towards adult vaccination.

Modeling patients' choice between a primary care physician or a diabetes specialist for the management of type-2 diabetes using a bivariate probit analysis.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of type-2 diabetes patients that were initially and currently being treated by primary care physicians (PCPs) or diabetes specialists and assess predictors influencing their choice. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in nine Greek primary healthcare units. Patients' choices were modeled using a bivariate probit analysis. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients participated (84% response rate). Only 15.9% and 11.9% of the respondents acknowledged having chosen a diabetes specialist for their initial or current treatment, respectively. The family history of diabetes in siblings and the screening for diabetic retinopathy during the past year were significantly positively associated with choosing a diabetes specialist (initially p=0.033 or currently p=0.007), and resulted in a statistically significant reduction of the joint probabilities of choosing a PCP by 15.6% and 13.6%, respectively. Younger age (p=0.040), female sex (p=0.017), higher HbA1c (p=0.004), experience of hypoglycemia (p=0.029) and low cardiovascular morbidity index (p=0.016) emerged as important predictors for choosing a diabetes specialist for their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a better insight in diabetes patients' choices regarding the category of their treating physicians and their predictors. More studies are required to replicate them and identify patient subpopulations that may favor diabetes specialists' guidance.

Exploring primary care physician experiences conducting practice-based research on adult vaccination: a qualitative evaluation study in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Research in primary care is necessary to empower its role in health systems and improve population health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this evaluation study was to assess the experiences of primary care physicians who participated as researchers in a multi-centre, mixed-methodology study on adult vaccination supported by a newly established practice-based research network. METHODS: Twenty-three physicians participated as researchers, operating in their own practices in 10 different prefectures of Greece. After the completion of the study, they were asked to reflect on their experiences in the research by providing written responses to the questions on the evaluation tool of the study. The open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Mean age of the researchers was 42.9 years old (±3.9, min 35, max 49) and 11 (47.8%) were male. Six themes emerged as beneficial for the participating researchers: (i) raised awareness of patients' needs, (ii) enhancement of clinical practice and services offered, (iii) positive impact on the doctor-patient relationship, (iv) personal satisfaction, (v) enrichment of their curriculum vitae and (vi) improvement of research skills. All researchers were interested in participating in future studies. CONCLUSION: The experience of conducting clinical research on adult vaccination in their own practices within a network was reported to be very rewarding. The benefits gained from their participation could be a valuable tool in promoting research and enhancing the quality of primary health care.