A National Database Study on Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy with a Surrogate Control for Uterine Size: A Proposed Quality Metric for Benign Indications.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between race and route of hysterectomy among patients undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding in the absence of uterine fibroid disease and excluding malignancy. DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Ambulatory Surgical databases to compare abdominal to minimally invasive route of hysterectomy. SETTING: Hospitals and hospital-affiliated ambulatory surgical centers participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project in 2019 PATIENTS: 75,838 patients who had undergone hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding excluding uterine fibroids and malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: n/a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 75,838 hysterectomies performed for abnormal uterine bleeding in the absence of uterine fibroids and malignancy, 10.1% were performed abdominally and 89.9% minimally invasively. After adjusting for confounders, Black patients were 38% more likely to undergo abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients (OR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.70 p=0.002). Black race thus is independently associated with open surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite excluding uterine fibroids as a risk factor for an abdominal route of hysterectomy, Black race remained an independent predictor for abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy and Black patients were found to undergo a disproportionately higher rate of abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients.

The Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Timing on Milliequivalents of Opioid Use and Immediate Postoperative Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block timing (preoperative or postoperative) on postoperative opioid use (quantified via morphine milligram equivalents; MME) and pain scores in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-institution cohort study SETTING: Academic-affiliated community hospital PATIENTS: A total of 2982 patients were included who underwent a minimally invasive total hysterectomy between January 2018 and December 2022, excluding patients with a malignancy diagnosis, concurrent urogynecological procedure, vaginal hysterectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, or those with baseline narcotic use (opioid use within the 3 months before surgery). Patients were separated into 3 groups: no TAP blocks (n = 1966, 65.9%), preoperative TAP blocks (854, 28.6%), and postoperative TAP blocks (162, 5.4%). INTERVENTIONS: Summary statistics and mixed-effects regression methods were used for data analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was a statistically significant lower mean use of opioids (MME 43.2 vs 53.9, p = .002) among patients who received a TAP block (either pre or postoperatively) than those who did not receive a block. However, when comparing preoperative vs postoperative patients with TAP block, there was no statistically significant difference in mean opioid use (MME 43.4 vs 42.1, p = .752). There were no differences in postoperative pain scores between patients with and without a TAP block, however, more opioids were required in patients who did not receive a TAP block to achieve the same pain scores as those who did receive a TAP block. There was a statistically significant shorter time to discharge for TAP versus patients without TAP block(median 5.5 vs 6.3 hours, p ≤ .001) as well as preoperative versus postoperative patients with TAP block (median 5.3 vs 6.2 hours, p = .001). CONCLUSION: While TAP block use at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy reduced use of postoperative opioids, the timing of TAP block, either preoperatively or postoperatively, did not significantly affect opioid use. Preoperative compared with postoperative TAP block administration significantly shortened the time to discharge.

Adnexal torsion: a review of diagnosis and management strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adnexal torsion remains a diagnostic challenge heavily reliant on high clinical suspicion, with patient presentation and imaging used as adjuncts to aid in its diagnosis. This review summarizes diagnostic and management techniques of adnexal torsion to assist providers when encountering this surgical emergency. RECENT FINDINGS: Common findings of adnexal torsion include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and adnexal mass or ovarian enlargement. An elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may be useful for diagnosis. A 'whirlpool' sign, 'follicular ring' sign, enlarged/edematous ovary, and absent Doppler flow to the ovary are highly suggestive of adnexal torsion. Intraoperative visual diagnosis of ovarian death is highly inaccurate, with only 18-20% of ovaries necrotic on pathological examination. Necrotic appearing ovaries have been shown to have follicular activity on ultrasound one year postoperatively. SUMMARY: Pelvic ultrasound remains the first-line imaging modality. In patients of reproductive age, we recommend performing detorsion with ovarian conservation, even in cases where the tissue appears necrotic, given poor intraoperative diagnostic rates of tissue death. Retention of ovarian function is also reliant on a timely diagnosis and intervention. We emphasize that the risk of ovarian damage/loss outweigh the risk of a diagnostic laparoscopy in patients of reproductive age.

Cancer Risk-Reducing Opportunities in Gynecologic Surgery.

This review article discusses cancer risk-reducing opportunities in gynecologic surgery. We cover strategies to reduce ovarian and uterine cancer risk by presenting general practice guidelines and expanding on the literature behind clinical decision points. We address populations of women at increased hereditary risk and those at population risk. We specifically discuss risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, concomitant hysterectomy, opportunistic salpingectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, and hysterectomy. For clinical scenarios in which data are limited or conflicting, we detail the studies on which clinicians' decisions hinge to allow the reader to weigh the available evidence.

Primary intussusception in pregnancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is a rare cause of bowel obstruction in adults, typically associated with malignancy, granuloma formation, a foreign body or an anatomic defect. CASE: A 21-year-old, primiparous woman presented at 33 5/7 weeks' gestation with vague abdominal symptoms consistent with acute viral gastroenteritis. She did not improve with conservative measures. A presumptive diagnosis of severe preeclampsia was made based on elevated blood pressure, abnormal liver function tests and epigastric pain. Labor was induced 34 5/7 weeks' gestation. The patient did not improve after an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Abdominal radiographs and computed tomography were consistent with intussusception. Surgical findings were consistent with the radiologic findings. The patient underwent a right hemicolectomy with stapled anastomosis. No pathologic or anatomically anomalous lead point was identified intraoperatively or on final pathology. CONCLUSION: Intussusception is a rare finding in the peripartum period, often presenting with vague abdominal symptoms and mistaken for benign obstetric and nonobstetric diseases. This case is only the second one of adult perinatal intussusception without an anatomic or pathologic lead point.