ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a 7-day extended-hours clinical pharmacy service in the ED on medication prescribing errors upon hospital admission and time to medication reconciliation. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, high-needs patients reviewed by ED pharmacists were compared against those not reviewed, to determine if the service was associated with reduction in admission medication errors. The primary outcome was the rate of medication errors. Errors were independently rated by two senior clinicians using a risk-probability matrix. Secondary outcomes included service's impact on time to best possible medication history (BPMH) and medication reconciliation. RESULTS: There were 242 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 105 intervention vs 137 control. In the intervention arm, 74 patients had at least 1 medication error compared with 113 in the control arm (total errors 206 vs 407). The error rate per 10 medications (interquartile range) was 1.4 (0, 2.9) in the intervention arm compared with 2.7 (1.2, 4.3) in the control arm (risk ratio 0.66 [95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.78]; P < 0.001). There were 33 moderate-risk and no high-risk errors (intervention), compared with 84 moderate-risk and 3 high-risk errors (control). Percent agreement was 98.98% (weighted kappa: 0.62). Time to BPMH and medication reconciliation were reduced from 40.5 and 45.0 h to 7.8 and 40.0 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-day extended-hours ED clinical pharmacy service was associated with a reduction in medication prescribing errors in high-needs patients and improved time to BPMH and medication reconciliation.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the attitudes and beliefs of Australian ED clinicians towards antimicrobial stewardship in the ED. METHODS: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with ED clinicians between March and October 2015. Participants were identified via purposive and snowball sampling. Questionnaires were developed using the literature. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis via the framework approach. Two researchers coded independently, with one using QSR International's NVivo 10 software and the other manually. Emergent themes were identified and classified. RESULTS: Twenty-two clinicians (eight doctors, eight nurses and six pharmacists) from seven institutions participated. Participants were aware and concerned about antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians were divided based on their opinion on whether antimicrobials are prescribed appropriately and judiciously in the ED, with many perceiving prescribing to be inappropriate. Prior knowledge of the term 'Antimicrobial Stewardship' was demonstrated by doctors and pharmacists, with a relative lack of awareness by nurses. Four main themes were identified as both barriers and facilitators to antimicrobial stewardship in the ED: individual healthcare provider, resource, organisational and cultural. Uncertainty of diagnosis, time and resource pressures, reliance on previous experience and lack of access to expert opinion were perceived barriers. To facilitate appropriate prescribing, clinicians emphasised the need for routine education and feedback, adequate staffing, robust guidelines, senior medical clinician advocacy and multidisciplinary support. CONCLUSIONS: Australian ED clinicians were aware of antimicrobial resistance. Many perceive injudicious antimicrobial use as problematic. Consideration of ED clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators might enhance implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in EDs.
