Efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizers against human norovirus using RNase-RT-qPCR with validation by human intestinal enteroid replication.

Successful human norovirus (HuNoV) cultivation in stem cell-derived human intestinal enteroids (HIE) was recently reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anti-HuNoV efficacy of two alcohol-based commercial hand sanitizers and 60% ethanol by suspension assay using RNase-RT-qPCR, with subsequent validation of efficacy by HuNoV cultivation using the HIE model. In suspension, when evaluated by RNase-RT-qPCR, 60% ethanol resulted in less than one log10 reduction in HuNoV genome equivalent copies (GEC) regardless of contact time (30 or 60s) or soil load. The two commercial products outperformed 60% ethanol regardless of contact time or soil load, providing 2·2-3·2 log10 HuNoV GEC reductions by suspension assay. Product B could not be validated in the HIE model due to cytotoxicity. Following a 60s exposure, viral replication in the HIE model increased 1·9 ± 0·2 log10 HuNoV GEC for the neutralization (positive) control and increased 0·9 ± 0·2 log10 HuNoV GEC in challenged HIE after treatment with 60% ethanol. No HuNoV replication in HIE was observed after a 60 s exposure to Product A.

Molecular methods used to estimate thermal inactivation of a prototype human norovirus: more heat resistant than previously believed?

Two molecular-based methods for estimating capsid integrity as a proxy for virus infectivity were used to produce thermal inactivation profiles of Snow Mountain virus (SMV), a prototype human norovirus (HuNoV). Monodispersed virus suspensions were exposed to 77, 80, 82 and 85 °C for various times, pre-treated with either propidium monoazide (PMA) or RNase, and subjected to RNA isolation followed by RT-qPCR amplification. D-values were 25.6 ± 2.8, 3.1 ± 0.1, 0.7 ± 0.04 and 0.2 ± 0.07 min at 77, 80, 82 and 85 °C, respectively for PMA-treated SMV; and 16.4 ± 0.4, 3.9 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.3 and 0.12 ± 0.00 min at 77, 80, 82 and 85 °C, respectively for RNase-treated SMV. Corresponding zD values were 3.80 °C and 3.71 °C for PMA and RNase-treated virus, respectively. Electron microscopy data applied to heat-treated virus-like particles supported this relatively high degree of thermal resistance. The data suggest that SMV is more heat resistant than common cultivable HuNoV surrogates. Standardized thermal inactivation methods (such as milk pasteurization) may not be stringent enough to eliminate this virus and perhaps other HuNoV.

Attachment of different Salmonella serovars to materials commonly used in a poultry processing plant.

Salmonella can adhere to poultry and food contact surfaces and persist to cause diseases. Adhesion of Salmonella Sofia (n = 14), S. Typhimurium (n = 6), S. Infantis (n = 3) and S. Virchow (n = 2) to Teflon, stainless steel, glass, rubber and polyurethane were assayed using epifluorescence microscopy. Surface free energies of bacteria and materials were calculated using contact angle values and interfacial free energy between isolates and materials determined. Surface roughness of the materials was analysed using atomic force microscopy. S. Sofia isolates adhered in higher numbers (P < 0.05) to all materials compared to other serovars. The mean number of cells of S. Sofia isolates attaching to Teflon were significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to all materials except stainless steel (P > 0.05). Mean roughness values ranged from 82.26 nm (Teflon) to 1.34 nm (glass). Correlations between the apolar component of the surface free energy of materials (gamma(S)(LW)) and bacterial adhesion (R(2) = 0.80), and between gamma(S)(LW) and the surface roughness of the materials (R(2) = 0.71) were found. Materials more positive in interfacial free energies had the highest number of adhering bacteria. Generalised surface property measurements were found to be useful in characterising Salmonella attachment but the degree of variability in results suggests that other factors, such as flagella or membrane proteins, could also contribute.

Issues in determining factors influencing bacterial attachment: a review using the attachment of Escherichia coli to abiotic surfaces as an example.

An understanding of the mechanisms which facilitate the attachment of Escherichia coli and other bacterial species to abiotic surfaces is desired by numerous industries including the food and medical industries. Numerous studies have attempted to explain bacterial attachment as a function of bacterial properties such as cellular surface charge, hydrophobicity and outer membrane proteins amongst others. Conflicting evidence in the literature both for and against a positive relationship may arise from the nature of the test methods used to measure them. A handful of recent studies utilizing technologies such as atomic force microscopy have begun to look at bacterial attachment at a single cell and molecular level. These studies may provide the information required to fully understand the underlying factors which influence bacterial cell attachment to abiotic surfaces. A number of issues in determining the influential factors of bacterial attachment have been identified from the literature: a lack of standardization and sensitivity of methods, as well as the value of measuring bulk properties of a number of cells rather than the behaviour of single cells which may overlook key interactions at a molecular level. These issues will need to be addressed in future studies in this area.