Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Oncologie (Paris) ; 16(5): 267-276, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26190928

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2006, bevacizumab, a targeted therapy agent was combined with FOLFIRI for the firstline treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS/RESULTS: A study on a homogenous series of 111 patients from the Brittany and Pays de la Loire areas who received bevacizumab-FOLFIRI as first-line treatment in 2006 showed the following results: 51 responses, 29 stabilisations, 21 progressions and 10 cases of toxicity prior to assessment. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.1 months and median progression-free survival was 10.2 months. Surgery secondary to treatment tripled median OS which reached 59.2 months in resected patients versus 18.8 months in unresected patients. Comparison of patients aged more or less than 70 years showed no differences in terms of benefits or risks. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab-FOLFIRI could be administered as part of a routine care protocol to elderly patients previously evaluated by a geriatric assessment and validated by a multidisciplinary staff.


En 2006, bevacizumab-FOLFIRI représente la thérapie ciblée administrable dès la première ligne chez les patients porteurs d'un cancer colorectal métastatique non opérable. Une série homogène de 111 patients colligés en région Bretagne et Pays de la Loire ayant reçu du bevacizumab- FOLFIRI en première ligne en 2006 révèle les résultats suivants: 51 réponses, 29 stabilités, 21 progressions et 10 toxicités avant évaluation. La médiane de survie globale (OS) est de 25,1 mois et la médiane de survie sans progression (PFS) de 10,2 mois. Dans le cas d'une chirurgie secondaire, l'OS médian triple de 18,8 mois chez les patients non réséqués versus 59,2 mois ceux réséqués. En comparant les sujets âgés de plus et de moins de 70 ans, aucune différence n'a été mise en évidence en termes de bénéfice ou de risque. Bevacizumab-FOLFIRI pourrait être administré en pratique courante chez les personnes âgées sous couvert d'une évaluation gériatrique et d'une approche multidisciplinaire.

2.
Gut ; 44(2): 270-3, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9895389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can have severe gastrointestinal effects and cause peptic ulcers to bleed. Acute bleeding from oesophageal varices is a major complication of cirrhosis of the liver. AIMS: To investigate the role, using a case-control study, of NSAIDs in first bleeding episodes associated with oesophageal or cardial varices in cirrhotic patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: A structured interview was conducted of 125 cirrhotic patients with bleeding mainly related to oesophageal varices and 75 cirrhotic controls with oesophageal varices who had never bled. RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients who were admitted for bleeding related to portal hypertension were more likely to have used NSAIDs during the week before the index day (31 of 125 (25%)) than the cirrhotic controls (eight of 75 (11%); odds ratio = 2.8, p = 0.016). Use of aspirin alone or combined with other NSAIDs was also more prevalent in the cases (21 of 125 (17%)) than in the controls (three of 75 (4%); odds ratio = 4.9, p = 0.007). Logistic regression analysis showed that NSAID use (p = 0.022, odds ratio = 2. 9, 95% confidence interval = 1.8 to 4.7) and variceal size (p<0.001, odds ratio = 4.0, 95% confidence interval = 1.4 to 11.5) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin, used alone or combined with other NSAIDs, was associated with a first variceal bleeding episode in patients with cirrhosis. Given the life threatening nature of this complication, the possible benefit of this treatment should be weighed against the risk shown here. No firm conclusions could be drawn on non-aspirin NSAIDs used alone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Adult , Aged , Aspirin/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/pathology , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors
3.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 19(10): 804-10, 1995 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8566560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of treatment regimens and survival rates of stomach adenocarcinoma recorded in the Finistère cancer registry from 1984 to 1989. METHODS: In a population of 838,627 inhabitants, 1,280 patients with a gastric cancer were registered; 1,164 patients (693 males and 471 females) had an adenocarcinoma. Survival rates were estimated by the actuarial method, and compared using the logrank test and the Cox model. RESULTS: Surgical resection was the main treatment for 661 patients (57%). The frequency of curative resection increased from 25% between 1984 and 1986 to 35% after 1986. Among the other patients, 39 (3%) were treated by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and 53 patients (4%) by endoscopy alone; 253 patients had only symptomatic treatment. The survival rates of all patients were 43% at 1 year and 20% at 5 years. The median survival was 9.2 +/- 0.6 months. In patients with cancer managed surgically, the factors associated with a better prognosis were young age, long duration of symptoms before diagnosis, ulcerated macroscopic aspect, limited tumour extension and curative surgical resection. In other patients, 2 factors were associated a with better prognosis: the absence of metastases and an endoscopic palliative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the main treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. Although the frequency of surgery increased, the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma did not improve within this 6-year period.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Gastrectomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy
4.
N Engl J Med ; 333(9): 555-60, 1995 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7623904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is considered the most effective way to stop bleeding from esophageal varices, but acute variceal bleeding is still associated with a high risk of rebleeding and death. We compared sclerotherapy alone with sclerotherapy and octreotide to control acute variceal bleeding and prevent early rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: In a double-blind, prospective trial, 199 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who underwent emergency sclerotherapy were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of octreotide (25 micrograms per hour) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome measure was survival without rebleeding five days after sclerotherapy. RESULTS: After five days, the proportion of patients who had survived without rebleeding was higher in the octreotide group (85 of 98 patients, or 87 percent) than in the placebo group (72 of 101, or 71 percent; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, 4 to 27 percent; P = 0.009). The mean number of units of blood transfused within the first 24 hours after sclerotherapy was lower in the octreotide group (1.2 units; range, 0 to 7) than in the placebo group (2.0 units; range, 0 to 10; P = 0.006). A logistic-regression analysis showed that the treatment assignment (P = 0.003) and the number of blood units transfused before any other treatment was undertaken (P = 0.002) were the only two variables independently associated with survival without rebleeding. After adjustment for base-line differences between the two groups, the odds ratio for treatment failure in the placebo group, as compared with the octreotide group, was 3.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.3). The mean (+/- SD) 15-day cumulative survival rate (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) was 88 +/- 12 percent in both groups. Side effects were minor, and their incidence was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, the combination of sclerotherapy and octreotide is more effective than sclerotherapy alone in controlling acute variceal bleeding, but there is no difference between the overall mortality rates associated with the two approaches to treatment.


Subject(s)
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Sclerotherapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Blood Transfusion , Double-Blind Method , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/mortality , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Octreotide/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Sclerotherapy/mortality , Survival Rate , Treatment Failure
5.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 17(1): 9-16, 1993.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8467980

ABSTRACT

The incidence of esophageal cancer in the French county of Finistère is among the highest in France (26.7/10(5) for males). The authors analyzed the survival rates for squamous cell carcinomas from data of the Finistère tumor registry in order to describe different prognostic groups of patients using the multivariate Cox model. From 1984 to 1988, 716 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were registered in an overall population of 828,000 residents: 675 males and 41 females. Survival was calculated using the actuarial method. Six hundred and seventy five patients died before the point date (31 Dec 1989). Only one patient was lost to follow-up. The actuarial survival rates of all patients were 89 +/- 1% at 3 months, 68 +/- 2% at 6 months, 37 +/- 2% at one year, 12 +/- 1% at 3 years and 6 +/- 1% at 5 years; median survival was 9.1 +/- 0.4 months. Survival was significantly related to cancer size, tumor extension and surgical contraindications. In the Cox model, age, cancer size, surgical contraindications, year of diagnosis were independent prognostic predictors. There was a significant increase in survival rates after 1986: median survival was 8.1 +/- 0.4 months between 1984 and 1986 and 10.1 +/- 0.5 months between 1987 and 1988. Patients treated by curative resection had higher actuarial survival rates (median survival 22.5 +/- 4.1 months) than patients who underwent palliative resection (median survival 11.3 +/- 1.2 months). In patients with cancer managed surgically, the prognostic predictors were tumor size, curative vs palliative surgical resection and association with chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...