ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the University of Tennessee PharmD/PhD program and assess the prevalence and characteristics of PharmD/PhD programs in the United States. METHODS: Survey instruments were mailed in May 2004 to UT dual-degree program participants and deans of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. RESULTS: University of Tennessee PharmD/PhD students completed more than 30 hours of graduate credit before obtaining their PharmD and 72.2% agreed or strongly agreed that the program met their professional goals. More than 40% of US pharmacy colleges and schools have or plan to have PharmD/PhD programs. A wide variation exists in the level of integration, PhD concentrations offered, entrance requirements, and student benefits. Most schools with PharmD/PhD programs had few students enrolled in the program, but attrition rates were low (<20%) for 69% of the schools. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-degree programs attract and retain pharmacy students in research programs and 47.6% of graduates entered academia and industry.
Subject(s)
Education, Graduate , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate , Schools, Pharmacy , Students, Pharmacy , Curriculum , Education, Graduate/economics , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate/economics , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Personal Satisfaction , Research/trends , Schools, Pharmacy/economics , TennesseeABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to describe how managed behavioral health care affects youth in the juvenile justice system with behavioral health disorders. A multiple case study consisting of 30 semistructured interviews of officials in the local, state, and federal juvenile justice system was performed. The study found that agreement exists among officials that managed behavioral health care acts as a barrier to behavioral health care for juvenile justice youth. A major conclusion of the study was that the relinquishment of youth custody to the state for the purpose of accessing behavioral services must cease.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Juvenile Delinquency/rehabilitation , Managed Care Programs , Mental Health Services , Social Behavior Disorders/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Forensic Psychiatry , Humans , Juvenile Delinquency/psychology , Prisoners/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , United StatesABSTRACT
There is a wide variation in viewpoints regarding screening youth in the juvenile justice system for behavioral and substance abuse disorders. No consensus exists within and among local, state, and federal juvenile justice officials regarding the necessity of screening youth for behavioral and substance abuse disorders. Local, state, and federal juvenile justice officials voiced concern regarding screening young people for behavioral and substance abuse disorders without having available funding or facilities for diagnosis and treatment.
