Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Prostate ; 2024 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734988

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, for various reasons, certain patients do not benefit from this treatment (OBS) or only at a late stage (LSR). There are few studies on this subject and none on a "high-risk" population, such as patients of African descent. Our objective was to estimate the metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who did not receive salvage radiotherapy, and to identify risk factors of disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study that included 154 patients, 99 in the OBS group and 55 in the LSR group. All were treated by total prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between January 2000 and December 2020 and none received early salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the time to biochemical recurrence. The median follow-up was 10.0 and 11.8 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. The median time from surgery to LSR was 5.1 years. The two groups did not show a significant difference in MFS: 90.6% at 10 years for the OBS group and 93.3% for the LSR group. The median MFS was 19.8 and 19.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups respectively. OS for the OBS group was significantly higher than that for the LSR group (HR: 2.14 [1.07-4.29]; p = 0.03), with 10-year OS of 95.9% for the OBS group and 76.1% for the LSR group. Median OS was 16 and 15.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed satisfactory metastasis-free and OS rates relative to those reported in the scientific literature. The challenge is not to question the benefit of early salvage radiotherapy, but to improve the identification of patients at risk of progression through the development of molecular and genomic tests for more highly personalized medicine.

2.
Prostate ; 82(2): 269-275, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34822183

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Several studies in the Caucasian population have shown the benefit of using docetaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer at the castration-resistant stage (mCRPC). However, there are no strong data for men of African ancestry. The objective of this study was to estimate the overall and progression-free survival of patients according to these treatments at the mCRPC stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study that consecutively included 211 men with mCRPC between June 1, 2009 and August 31, 2020. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: The present study included 180 patients for analyses. There was no difference in OS (log-rank test = 0.73), with a median follow-up of 20.7 months, regardless of the treatment administered in the first line. Men with mCRPC who received hormonotherapy (abiraterone or enzalutamide) showed better progression-free survival than those who received docetaxel (log-rank test = 0.004), with a particular interest for abiraterone hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.67). The patient characteristics were similar, except for bone lesions, irrespective of the treatment administered in the first line. After univariate then multivariate analysis, only World Health Organization status and metastases at diagnosis were significantly associated with progression. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the use of hormonotherapy (abiraterone or enzalutamide) with a tendency for abiraterone in first line for men with African ancestry at the mCRPC stage.


Subject(s)
Androstenes/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Guadeloupe/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnosis , Neoplasm Metastasis/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Progression-Free Survival , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/ethnology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Prostate ; 81(14): 1091-1096, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320690

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) accounts for 12% of prostate cancers diagnosed in Guadeloupe according to the Guadeloupean cancer registry. Most published studies have been conducted on the Caucasian population, whereas data concerning mHSPC in the Afro-Caribbean population are lacking. We aimed to describe the patient characteristics and estimate the progression-free survival of men with mHSPC in an Afro-Caribbean population according to the available treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study that consecutively included 133 men with mHSPC between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 at the University Hospital of Guadeloupe. The primary endpoint was a description of the patients' characteristics with a description of complications at diagnosis. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 147 ng/ml and 37% of patients presented with a disease-related complication at diagnosis. The survival analysis according to treatment showed median survival of 15 months for the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + chemotherapy group, 20 months for the ADT + new hormone therapy group, and 21.5 months for the ADT alone group, with no significant difference between the three therapeutic options (log-rank test: 0.27). In univariate analysis, none of the patient characteristics at diagnosis (i.e., age, PSA, bone lesions, visceral lesions) were significantly associated with the risk of progression, regardless of the treatment. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of progression-free survival between currently validated treatments administered in the first line, regardless of the tumor volume or risk group. Future studies with larger numbers of patients and involving molecular factors are required to confirm or invalidate these results and understand the evolution of prostate cancer in our population and thus better prevent complications related to the disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Guadeloupe , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
4.
World J Urol ; 38(6): 1493-1499, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485740

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Grade Group (GG) classification is recommended by guidelines as a reliable prognostic factor of prostate cancer. However, most studies have been performed on the Caucasian population. Our objective was to validate GG classification as a safe way to classify intermediate- and high-risk patients with African ancestry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study in an Afro-Caribbean population. A total of 1236 patients were included between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified according to (GG). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference at 5 and 10-year BCR-free survival between the intermediate- and high-risk groups, based on the D'Amico classification. There was a highly significant difference in BCR-free survival at 5 (p < 0.0001) and 10 years (p < 0.0001) for patients of GG 1 and 2 vs 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year BCR-free survival of patients of GG grades 1 and 2, whether lymph-node dissection was performed or not. There was a significant difference between GG 2 and 3 patients in 5 (p = 0.008) and 10-year BCR-free survival (p = 0.01). High PSA (p < 0.0001), pathological GG ≥ 3 (p < 0.0001), pathological stage pT3 (p < 0.0001) and positive margins (p < 0.0001) were factors for BCR in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The GG 2015 classification appears to be a better prognostic factor than D'Amico classification for intermediate- and high-risk Afro-Caribbean patients.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Black People , Caribbean Region , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/classification , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis
5.
J Urol ; 197(5): 1229-1236, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993665

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Active surveillance is a treatment option for favorable risk prostate cancer. However, data are missing on populations of African descent. We evaluated the safety and benefit of active surveillance in an African Caribbean cohort with favorable risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, a single center, prospective cohort study was performed in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, including patients on active surveillance who had low risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less and Gleason score 6 or less) or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml, Gleason score 3 + 4 or less and life expectancy less than 10 years). Treatment was recommended in case of grade progression, increased tumor volume, prostate cancer doubling time less than 36 months or patient wish. Overall survival, disease specific survival and duration of active surveillance were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of active surveillance termination. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients with a median age of 64 years were enrolled in study. Median followup was 4 years (IQR 2.3-5.5). Overall survival at 30 months, 5 years and 10 years was 99.5%, 98.5% and 90.7%, respectively. Disease specific survival at 30 months, and 5 and 10 years was 100%. At 30 months, 5 years and 10 years 72.7%, 52.6% and 40.4% of patients, respectively, remained untreated and on active surveillance. Age (HR 0.96 per additional year, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and prostate specific antigen density (HR 1.52 per additional 0.1 ng/ml, 95% CI 1.20-1.89) were found to be independent predictors of active surveillance termination. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance is safe and beneficial for highly selected African Caribbean patients. It seems to be feasible for patients at low risk and intermediate favorable risk. Prostate specific antigen density could help better select these patients.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting/methods , Aged , Black People , Caribbean Region , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Risk Assessment/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...