Effect of drying conditions on the quality of IRGA 424 rice.

BACKROUND: The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of drying temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), tempering time (40, 80, and 120 min), and initial moisture content at onset of tempering (15, 17, and 19% dry basis) on head rice yield, milled rice yield, and total processing time of IRGA 424 rice. RESULTS: The most significant effects were the drying temperature and its interaction with initial moisture content at onset of tempering. The optimum conditions predicted to reach the highest total yield (74.1%) included drying at 46.6 °C, 49 min of tempering time, and initial moisture content at onset of tempering of 19%. To achieve the maximum value of whole grain yield (52.9%), drying at 40 °C, 40 min of tempering, and an initial moisture content of 19% at the initiation of tempering were required. Under these conditions, the grain reached a moisture content of 13% in 84 min. CONCLUSION: Whole-grain rice yields may be maximized through the optimization of the drying process. This may result in a larger fraction of the crop entering the human food chain, enhancing the value of the crop, and resulting in a smaller fraction of broken grain, which commands a lower market value. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation and Widespread Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies in the UK.

Renewable energy will potentially make an important contribution towards the dual aims of meeting carbon emission reduction targets and future energy demand. However, some technologies have considerable potential to impact on the biodiversity of the environments in which they are placed. In this study, an assessment was undertaken of the realistic deployment potential of a range of renewable energy technologies in the UK, considering constraints imposed by biodiversity conservation priorities. We focused on those energy sources that have the potential to make important energy contributions but which might conflict with biodiversity conservation objectives. These included field-scale solar, bioenergy crops, wind energy (both onshore and offshore), wave and tidal stream energy. The spatially-explicit analysis considered the potential opportunity available for each technology, at various levels of ecological risk. The resultant maps highlight the energy resource available, physical and policy constraints to deployment, and ecological sensitivity (based on the distribution of protected areas and sensitive species). If the technologies are restricted to areas which currently appear not to have significant ecological constraints, the total potential energy output from these energy sources was estimated to be in the region of 5,547 TWh/yr. This would be sufficient to meet projected energy demand in the UK, and help to achieve carbon reduction targets. However, we highlight two important caveats. First, further ecological monitoring and surveillance is required to improve understanding of wildlife distributions and therefore potential impacts of utilising these energy sources. This is likely to reduce the total energy available, especially at sea. Second, some of the technologies under investigation are currently not deployed commercially. Consequently this potential energy will only be available if continued effort is put into developing these energy sources/technologies, to enable realisation of their full potential.