Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio as a predictor of systemic inflammation - A cross-sectional study in a pre-admission setting.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR)  is an emerging biomarker that is used to predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in cardiac and cancer surgeries. The association of this biomarker with systemic illness and its usefulness in risk assessment of preoperative patients has not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of elevated NLR in preoperative patients and to examine the relationship between elevated NLR and the presence of systemic illnesses as well as anaesthesia risk indices such as American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) and the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) scores.   DESIGN: Cross-sectional study Setting: Anaesthesia pre-admission clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada Patients: We evaluated 1117 pre-operative patients seen at an anesthesia preadmission clinic. RESULTS: NLR was elevated (>3.3) in 26.6% of target population. In multivariate analysis, congestive cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus and malignancy were independent risk factors predicting raised NLR. After regression analysis, a relationship between NLR and ASA score (Odds Ratio 1.78; 95% CI: 1.42-2.24) and revised cardiac risk index (RCRI, odds ratio 1.33; 95% CI: 1.09-1.64, p-value: 0.0063) was observed. CONCLUSIONS:  NLR was elevated (> 3.3) in 26.6% of patients. Congestive cardiac failure and malignancy were two constant predictors of elevated NLR at >3.3 and > 4.5. There was a strong association between NLR and anesthesia risk scoring tools of ASA and RCRI.

Vocal cord palsy after anterior cervical spine surgery: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vocal cord palsy (VCP) is a known complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. However, the true incidence and interventions to minimize this complication are not well studied. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to identify the incidence, risk, and interventions for VCP after anterior cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a qualitative systematic literature review. SAMPLE: Prospective and retrospective trials of patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery that reported on postoperative VCP or recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: incidence of VCP after anterior cervical spine surgery; secondary: risk factors and interventions for prevention of VCP after anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews for clinical studies reporting VCP in anterior cervical spine surgery, limited to studies published between 1995 and June 2013 in English and French languages. After selection of studies independently by two review authors, data on incidence, risk, and interventions were extracted. Qualitative analysis was performed on three domains: quality of studies, strength of evidence, and impact of interventions. RESULTS: Our search has identified 187 abstracts, and 34 studies met our inclusion criteria. The incidence of VCP ranges from 2.3% to 24.2%. Significant heterogeneity in study design and definition of VCP were used in the published studies. There is good evidence that reoperation increases the risk of VCP. One study of moderate strength suggests that operating from the right side may increase the risk of VCP. Among the interventions studied, endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure monitoring with deflation during retraction has shown to reduce the incidence from 6% to 2%, but this result was not confirmed by randomized control trials. Limited evidence exists for other interventions of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring and methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: Vocal cord palsy is a significant morbidity after anterior cervical surgery with incidence up to 24.2% in the immediate postoperative period, with a higher risk in reoperation of the anterior cervical spine. Moderate evidence exists for ETT cuff pressure adjustment in preventing this complication.

Does regional anesthesia improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty?

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is amenable to various regional anesthesia techniques that may improve patient outcome. We sought to answer whether regional anesthesia decreased mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, blood loss, duration of surgery, pain, opioid-related adverse effects, cognitive defects, and length of stay. We also questioned whether regional anesthesia improved rehabilitation. To do so, we performed a systematic review of the contemporary literature comparing general anesthesia and/or systemic analgesia with regional anesthesia and/or regional analgesia for TKA. To reflect contemporary surgical and anesthetic practice, only randomized, controlled trials from 1990 onward were included. We identified 28 studies involving 1538 patients. There was insufficient evidence from randomized, controlled trials alone to conclude if anesthetic technique influenced mortality, cardiovascular morbidity other than postoperative hypotension, or the incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism when using thromboprophylaxis. Our review suggests there was no difference in perioperative blood loss or duration of surgery in patients who received general anesthesia versus regional anesthesia. Compared with general anesthesia and/or systemic analgesia, regional anesthesia and/or analgesia reduced postoperative pain, morphine consumption, and opioid-related adverse effects. Length of stay may be reduced and rehabilitation facilitated for patients undergoing regional anesthesia and analgesia for TKA.