Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 115(3): 377-87, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18301956

ABSTRACT

Amphetamines can enhance sustained attention, and reduce distractibility, in normal subjects and patients with attentional-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Their mechanism of action in this regard is unknown, however one possibility is that the drugs affect the superior colliculus (SC), a structure with a clearly defined role in distractibility. The aim of the present studies was to explore the effect of systemically and locally administered d-amphetamine on visual responses in the superficial layers of the SC to wholefield light flashes in the rat, using local field potential and multi-unit recording. Systemic and intra-collicular d-amphetamine both produced a dose-related depression of visual activity, which sometimes progressed to inactivation of the multi-unit response at the highest dose. As a consequence, it is possible that amphetamines enhance sustained attention, and reduce distractibility, via an action on the colliculus. A corollary of this is that collicular dysfunction may underlie enhanced distractibility in ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention/drug effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Dextroamphetamine/pharmacology , Superior Colliculi/drug effects , Animals , Evoked Potentials, Visual/drug effects , Female , Microelectrodes , Photic Stimulation , Rats
2.
Can J Anaesth ; 35(2): 143-8, 1988 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3281765

ABSTRACT

There have been conflicting reports of the value of naloxone infusions to prevent the side-effects associated with epidural morphine. In our study, 29 patients undergoing thoracotomies for pulmonary surgery received epidural morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) shortly after induction of anaesthesia. One hour after arrival in the Recovery Room, one of four naloxone bolus and infusion sequences was administered: saline bolus followed by saline infusion; 0.4 microgram.kg-1 naloxone bolus followed by 0.4 microgram.kg-1.hr-1 naloxone infusion; 2.0 micrograms.kg-1 naloxone bolus followed by 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 naloxone infusion; and 4.0 micrograms.kg-1 naloxone bolus followed by 4.0 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 naloxone infusion. Although with the number of patients studied, there were no statistically significant differences among groups, clinically, there was a trend toward decreased analgesia with all three naloxone infusion doses as determined by analgesic requirements, longest analgesic-free period and visual analogue pain scores. In addition, side-effects occurred in all groups. We conclude that prophylactic naloxone, used in this manner, is not an appropriate technique for the prevention of side-effects associated with epidural morphine used for the prevention of pain after thoracotomy.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Anesthesia, Epidural , Morphine , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Aged , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Blood Gas Analysis , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diazepam , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Isoflurane , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/adverse effects , Morphine/antagonists & inhibitors , Naloxone/adverse effects , Nitrous Oxide , Preanesthetic Medication , Random Allocation , Respiratory Function Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL