Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Opt Lett ; 38(22): 4888-91, 2013 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24322158

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate, to the best of our knowledge, a first accurate empirical model for reflectance measurements from highly turbid media over the full range of incident angles, i.e., for reflectivity values going from unity in the total internal reflection regime to nearly zero when almost all the light is transmitted. Evidence that our model is accurate is provided by extraction of the particle size, followed by independent verification with dynamic light scattering. Our methodology is in direct contrast with the prevalent approach in turbid media of focusing on only the critical angle region, which is just a small subset of the entire reflectance data.


Subject(s)
Light , Models, Biological , Nephelometry and Turbidimetry/methods , Refractometry/methods , Scattering, Radiation , Animals , Computer Simulation , Humans
2.
Rev Sci Instrum ; 83(8): 086107, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22938349

ABSTRACT

A widely used method for determining refractive index postulates that the derivative of the angular profile for light reflected from the sample is maximum at the critical angle for total internal reflection (TIR). It is well-known that in turbid media this "differentiation method" yields errors in refractive index. Unexplained anomalies in previous error-calculations are eliminated if one uses a recent model of TIR which departs from traditional Fresnel theory. However we find that, in practical situations, the refractive index obtained by differentiation even after error-correction is significantly different from the best estimate for the refractive index obtained by curve-fitting the reflectance data. Thus the differentiation method lacks scientific validity in turbid media.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...