Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Genomics ; 22(1): 776, 2021 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34717533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) productivity has been severely affected by various bacterial, viral and fungal diseases worldwide. When a plant is infected with the pathogen, various defense mechanisms are subsequently activated in plants at various molecular levels. Thus, for substantiating the disease control in an eco-friendly way, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms governing pathogen resistance in grapes. RESULTS: In our study, we performed genome-wide identification of various defensive genes expressed during powdery mildew (PM) and downy mildew (DM) infections in grapevine. Consequently, we identified 6, 21, 2, 5, 3 and 48 genes of Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 1 (EDS1), Non-Race-specific Disease Resistance (NDR1), Phytoalexin deficient 4 (PAD4), Nonexpressor of PR Gene (NPR), Required for Mla-specified resistance (RAR) and Pathogenesis Related (PR), respectively, in the grapevine genome. The phylogenetic study revealed that V. vinifera defensive genes are evolutionarily related to Arabidopsis thaliana. Differential expression analysis resulted in identification of 2, 4, 7, 2, 4, 1 and 7 differentially expressed Nucleotide-binding leucine rich repeat receptor (NLR), EDS1, NDR1, PAD4, NPR, RAR1 and PR respectively against PM infections and 28, 2, 5, 4, 1 and 19 differentially expressed NLR, EDS1, NDR1, NPR, RAR1 and PR respectively against DM infections in V. vinifera. The co-expression study showed the occurrence of closely correlated defensive genes that were expressed during PM and DM stress conditions. CONCLUSION: The PM and DM responsive defensive genes found in this study can be characterized in future for impelling studies relaying fungal and oomycete resistance in plants, and the functionally validated genes would then be available for conducting in-planta transgenic gene expression studies for grapes.


Subject(s)
Oomycetes , Vitis , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Humans , Oomycetes/metabolism , Phylogeny , Plant Diseases/genetics , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Powders , Vitis/genetics , Vitis/metabolism
2.
Crit Rev Biotechnol ; 41(7): 1114-1129, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993808

ABSTRACT

Pseudogenes, the debilitated parts of ancient genes, were previously scrapped off as junk or discarded genes with no functional significance. Pseudogenes have come under scrutiny for their functionality, since recent studies have unveiled their importance in the regulation of their corresponding parent genes and various biological mechanisms. Despite the enormous occurrence of pseudogenes in plants, the lack of experimental validation has contributed toward their unresolved roles in gene regulation. Contrarily, most of the studies associated with gene regulation have been mainly reported for humans, mice, and other mammalian genomes. Consequently, in order to present a cumulative report on plant-based pseudogenes research, an attempt has been made to assemble multiple studies presenting the pseudogene classification, the prediction and the determination of comparative accuracies of various computational pipelines, and recent trends in analyzing their biological functions, and regulatory mechanisms. This review represents the classical, as well as the recent advances on pseudogene identification and their potential roles in transcriptional regulation, which could possibly invigorate the quality of genome annotation, evolutionary analysis, and complexity surrounding the regulatory pathways in plants. Thus, when the ambiguous boundary girdling the pseudogenes eventually recedes on account of their explicit orchestration role, research in flora would no longer saunter compared to that on fauna.


Subject(s)
Genome , Pseudogenes , Animals , Biological Evolution , Gene Expression Regulation , Mice , Pseudogenes/genetics
3.
Genomics ; 112(1): 312-322, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802599

ABSTRACT

NBS-LRR comprises a large class of disease resistance (R) proteins that play a widespread role in plant protection against pathogens. In grapevine, powdery mildew cause significant losses in its productivity and efforts are being directed towards finding of resistance loci or genes imparting resistance/tolerance against such fungal diseases. In the present study, we performed genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR genes during PM infection in grapevine. We identified 18, 23, 12, 16, 10, 10, 9, 20 and 14 differentially expressed NBS-LRR genes in response to PM infection in seven partially PM-resistant (DVIT3351.27, Husseine, Karadzhandal, Khalchili, Late vavilov, O34-16, Sochal) and 2 PM-susceptible (Carignan and Thompson seedless) V. vinifera accessions. Further, the identified sequences were characterized based on chromosomal locations, physicochemical properties, gene structure and motif analysis, and functional annotation by Gene Ontology (GO) mapping. The NBS-LRR genes responsive to powdery mildew could potentially be exploited to improve resistance in grapes.


Subject(s)
Ascomycota , NLR Proteins/genetics , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Plant Proteins/genetics , Vitis/genetics , Vitis/microbiology , Chromosomes, Plant , Disease Resistance/genetics , Genome, Plant , Multigene Family , NLR Proteins/chemistry , NLR Proteins/classification , NLR Proteins/metabolism , Phylogeny , Plant Diseases/genetics , Plant Proteins/chemistry , Plant Proteins/classification , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic
4.
Noncoding RNA ; 3(2)2017 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29657289

ABSTRACT

Small non-coding RNAs have been extensively studied in plants over the last decade. In contrast, genome-wide identification of plant long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has recently gained momentum. LncRNAs are now being recognized as important players in gene regulation, and their potent regulatory roles are being studied comprehensively in eukaryotes. LncRNAs were first reported in humans in 1992. Since then, research in animals, particularly in humans, has rapidly progressed, and a vast amount of data has been generated, collected, and organized using computational approaches. Additionally, numerous studies have been conducted to understand the roles of these long RNA species in several diseases. However, the status of lncRNA investigation in plants lags behind that in animals (especially humans). Efforts are being made in this direction using computational tools and high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as the lncRNA microarray technique, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), RNA capture sequencing, (RNA CaptureSeq), etc. Given the current scenario, significant amounts of data have been produced regarding plant lncRNAs, and this amount is likely to increase in the subsequent years. In this review we have documented brief information about lncRNAs and their status of research in plants, along with the plant-specific resources/databases for information retrieval on lncRNAs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...