Plasmapheresis, Photopheresis, and Endovenous Immunoglobulin in Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) is the subject of much research. It is diagnosed by C4d staining at biopsy and circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The combination of intensive plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been recognized as an effective treatment for AAMR. We report our single-center experience on AAMR treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 23 transplanted patients (group A) with protein-A immunoadsorption (IA) and 7 patients (group B) with double-filtration plasmapheresis. All patients were treated with IVIG (400 mg/kg/d). Basic immunosuppression included cyclosporine, steroids, azathioprine, and antilymphocyte globulin or monoclonal antibodies (OKT3). A subgroup of 3 patients (3/7; group B1) was treated with photopheresis. RESULTS: In both groups, the mean number of extracorporeal procedures was 7.3 ± 4.5 and 5.5, respectively; the mean duration of treatment was 12.3 ± 10.2 and 14.5 days, respectively. In group A, we observed negative cross-matching in 96% after mean of 18 days; 1 patient died from sepsis, and 6 lost their grafts. In group B, negative circulating DSA were observed in all patients after a mean of 25 days, and 1 patient lost their allograft. CONCLUSIONS: In our observation, the 2 extracorporeal procedures had similar effects in terms of graft survival, DSA removal, and cross-match negativity (group A 74% vs 86%; 95.6% vs 100%). IA was faster for DSA removal. In our opinion, the higher costs of IA suggests its use just in high-risk cases, such as in hyperimmune or sensitized patients. Further studies are necessary to improve our knowledge.

Multimodal therapy with combined plasmapheresis, photoapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute antibody-mediated renal transplant rejection: a 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the role of antibodies has been documented in the development of acute rejection episodes. Antibody-mediated acute rejection (AMAR) may develop at any time after transplantation, with an incidence of almost 7%. Several therapeutic approaches have been proposed in the past decades. However, no data exist regarding combined plasma treatment (PT) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). The aim of this study was to report an initial single-center experience of combined PT and ECP with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for the treatment of AMAR. METHODS: Three patients were treated with this approach. RESULTS: In 2 cases, we observed immediate restoration of graft function, and in 1 case, in which we interrupted the protocol owing to lack of patient consent, the graft was lost. No organ infections were reported during the therapy period. The rationale for use of ECP is related to the presence of mixed antibody and cell-mediated mechanisms in acute rejection episodes. ECP inhibits specific pathogenic T cells. CONCLUSION: Our approach seemed to give good results in terms of graft survival and safety.

Accurate prediction of autologous stem cell apheresis yields using a double variable-dependent method assures systematic efficiency control of continuous flow collection procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stem cell collection is a standard procedure for the procurement of autologous grafts to rescue myelosuppression induced by high-dose treatments. Accurate prediction of collection yields may contribute to optimize planning and quality control of collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 313 autologous haematopoietic stem cell (AHSC) evaluable collections performed in 208 patients with haematologic and non-haematologic neoplasms from seven centres were prospectively analysed to test the accuracy of yield predictions generated by a formula that required the input of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell precount and desired PB volume to be processed. Data were matched in a standard linear regression, in a zero-point regression analysis and tested for prediction accuracy. Further 165 AHSC collections were analysed on a single-centre basis, using yield predictions as reference standards. RESULTS: Analysis showed high levels of correlation between measured collection yields (my) and predictions (py) (R = 0.85; P = 0.000000) as well as high degree of prediction accuracy (my vs. py at paired t-test: P = 0.114781; median my/py ratio = 1.23). Analysis of additional 165 AHSC collections on a single-centre basis showed that the analysed centres had 70% or more measured yields comprising the 0.6-1.8 interval of the my/py ratio. The observance of the 'efficiency' my/py interval assured collection quality control in these centres confirming the reliability of the method. CONCLUSIONS: This prediction method generates accurate and immediate yield predictions allowing collection planning and rapid efficiency control. As a consequence of our study, four centres out of seven use the described method to plan both leukapheresis number and single-procedure blood processing volume while the remaining three centres plan leukapheresis number on the basis of our predictions, maintaining a fixed single-procedure 200 ml/kg blood volume processing, according to their centre AHSC collection policy.

[Peripheral blood stem cell collection in pediatric malignancies: comparison between three mobilizing regimens]. / La raccolta di cellule staminali periferiche nei tumori pediatrici: confronto fra tre sistemi di mobilizzazione.

PURPOSE: The optimal method for PBSC (peripheral blood stem cells) mobilization in pediatric patients is still unknown. The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety of apheresis procedures and to compare the efficacy of three methods of PBSC mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study was performed on 28 pediatric patients (in three groups) with solid tumors at onset or on relapse. In two groups we tried to mobilize PBSC administering CHT (based on Carboplatin with Etoposide in the first group and Cyclophosphamide in the second group) followed by granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF); in the third group the mobilization regimen was based on G-CSF alone. RESULTS: Forty-nine mobilizations have been performed and a median of 6.5 CD34+ cells x 10(6)/Kg were collected, with a median number of one apheresis for each patient. Using Carboplatin with G-CSF and Cyclophosphamide with G-CSF we collected respectively a median value of 6.75 and 7.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The mobilization method based on G-CSF alone showed to be less effective (median of 4.3 CD34+ cells x 10(6)/kg collected). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the mobilizing regimens based on Carboplatin or Cyclophosphamide associated with G-CSF resulted both effective and better than the one based on G-CSF alone with a scanty number of apheresis procedures.

CD34+ cell mobilization for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: efficacy of a short course of G-CSF.

BACKGROUND: G-CSF-mobilized PBPCs are considered the richest source of HPCs for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation, but, despite their wide use, the best dose and schedule for G-CSF administration have not been definitively established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a target of collecting from the peripheral blood > or = 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight of the recipient, the short-course administration of glycosylated G-CSF (gly-G-CSF) in 30 healthy donors for an allogeneic transplantation was investigated. Gly-G-CSF was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 microg per kg per day in two divided doses over 3 days and was followed by a leukapheresis (on the 4th day) 12 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: A median of 53.5 circulating CD34+ cells per microL (range, 19-190) was found in the 30 donors on the day of first leukapheresis, which allowed a median CD34+ cell collection of 6.0 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the donor and 6.5 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the recipient. In 25 (83%) of 30 donors, a single procedure was sufficient to collect the target CD34+ cells, while in the other 5, two leukapheresis procedures were required. Hematologic reconstitution was observed in all patients at a median of 14 days (range, 10-23) for neutrophils and 14.5 days (range, 11-46) for platelets. With a median infusion of 3.9 x 10(8) CD3+ T-lymphocytes per kg of body weight of the recipient (range, 1.3-7.8), acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 13 (43%) of 30 and 15 (60%) of 25 evaluable patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 337 days from transplant, 22 (73%) of 30 patients are alive in complete remission. CONCLUSION: A schedule consisting of 3-day administration of gly-G-CSF followed by a single leukapheresis can be proposed and widely accepted by healthy donors, as 84 percent of them reach the target in the estimated time with a reduced drug exposure. The cost of the procedure is reduced, in terms of both the growth factor administration and the number of leukapheresis procedures. The search for the optimum methods of donor management may improve the acceptability of this procedure and increase the number of allogeneic transplantations from PBPCs.

Idarubicin intensified BUCY2 regimen in allogeneic unmanipulated transplant for high-risk hematological malignancies.

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with high-risk hematological malignancy aged from 3 to 58 years underwent an unmanipulated graft from an HLA-identical sibling after an irradiation-free preparative regimen consisting of idarubicin (IDA), 21 mg/m2/day administered by continuous infusion on days -12 and -11, followed by busulphan (BU), 4 mg/kg/day orally from day -7 to -4, and cyclophosphamide (CY), 60 mg/kg/day intravenously on days -3 and -2 (IDA-BUCY2). Most clinically relevant extra-hematological regimen-related toxicities consisted of stomatitis observed in all subjects and hemorrhagic cystitis occurred in five cases (17%) within 100 days after transplant. Six patients (21%) developed a grade 2 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and three (10%) a grade 3 or 4; extensive chronic GVHD was assessed in nine of 22 (41%) evaluable patients. So far, 12 patients have died and 17 are alive, 16 of whom disease-free, 5-41 months after transplant (median, 15 months). The causes of death were related to GVHD in three patients, to sepsis in one and to disease recurrence in the remaining eight. At present, only one of nine relapsed patients is alive. For all patients the actuarial probability of survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years +/- standard error (s.e.) was 63 +/- 9% and 52 +/- 10%, respectively. The actuarial probabilities of disease-free survival (DFS), relapse and transplant-related mortality (TRM) at both 1 and 2 years +/- s.e. were 53 +/- 9%, 35 +/- 9% and 16 +/- 7%, respectively. These results are encouraging but not substantially different from those obtained in 28 patients with malignancy in advanced phase transplanted after the standard BUCY2 regimen, who had an actuarial probability of OS, DFS, relapse and TRM projected at 10 years +/- s.e. of 54 +/- 10%, 57 +/- 9%, 36 +/- 9% and 11 +/- 6%, respectively. Although the retrospective comparison between the two groups does not seem to show any advantage in the use of the IDA intensified regimen, only a prospective randomized trial could answer this question.

Monitoring of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis allows a single, successful collection of hemopoietic progenitors in patients with low numbers of circulating stem cells.

We have studied a total of 188 patients with hematological malignancies, submitted to mobilization therapy with G-CSF associated or not with chemotherapy in order to: (1) establish the lower limit of circulating progenitor cells that allows the collection of 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg by a single leukapheresis, utilizing the instrument set on standard parameters; (2) evaluate whether the number and quality of CD34+ cells collected remain stable during leukapheresis; and (3) collect a sufficient number of circulating CD34+ cells by a single procedure in patients in whom such an approach would have been insufficient to reach the target with the instrument set on standard parameters. The retrospective analysis conducted in 85 patients showed that 19 circulating CD34+ cells/microl represented the cut-off number capable of discriminating between patients who will require one or more apheresis to collect 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The validity of this value was prospectively confirmed in 70 subsequent patients. Based on in vitro results that showed the stability in the number of CD34+ cells, the proportion of different CD34+ cell subpopulations and the clonogenic capacity of the stem cell compartment during leukapheresis both in the blood of the patients and in samples taken directly from the instrument, we have adapted the blood volume to be processed in 33 patients with <19 PB CD34+ cells/microl. Stem cell collection was monitored during the leukapheresis and the procedure was prolonged for a time period estimated to be sufficient to reach the target number of CD34+ cells with a single procedure. The median increment of the total blood volume processed, calculated from the volume set automatically by the instrument was 25.2%, with a median of 3.3-fold total blood volume processed. In all cases, a sufficient CD34+ cell collection was completed in a single procedure. After autograft, the pattern of blood reconstitution was similar to that of all the other patients.

Cancer-associated hemolytic-uremic syndrome with spontaneous resolution. A case report.

A case of cancer-related hemolytic-uremic syndrome is reported. The patient presented a spontaneous recovery, which is unusual in this clinical picture. Mitomycin C is regarded as responsible for this toxic event in most cases. The case history reported here is discussed in relation to dose and scheduling of mitomycin C, and a safe maximum dosage is suggested.