Fundic gland polyps: a still elusive entity on the eve of the year 2000.

Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are tiny multiple sessile polyps of the acid-secreting gastric mucosa. They have been described both in a sporadic form, mainly in middle-aged females, and in a syndromic form, associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)-Gardner's syndrome and attenuated variants (AFAP). They share the same histology, characterised by superficial and deep cystic dilatations, shortened gastric pits, with an inconspicuous lamina propria. They have been for a long time described as innocuous lesions, but some recent reports have shown that FGPs may harbour dysplastic foci and ultimately (particularly syndromic polyps) gastric cancer. Factors influencing their genesis are unknown. A circulating factor in FAP patients has been postulated and a role of female hormones has been suggested for sporadic FGPs. Whereas patients with sporadic FGPs have normal basal acid output, normal fast serum levels of gastrin and pepsinogen I, the role of gastrin seems crucial for the development of cystic changes in flat body-fundus mucosa, and for the appearance of FGPs in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. A role of H. pylori induced gastritis has been excluded. Actually, patients with both sporadic and syndromic FGPs appear consistently free from H. pylori colonisation, again for an unknown factor(s). Some recent reports have claimed a role for omeprazole in the genesis of FGPs, a highly controversial issue. Ultimately, the nature of FGPs is still debated: some have interpreted them as hamartomatous lesions, others as a peculiar form of hyperplastic polyp.

[Giant benign gastric ulcer penetrating into the liver, pancreas and mesocolon]. / Ulcera gastrica gigante benigna penetrante nel fegato, nel pancreas e nel mesocolon.

Penetration of the liver, pancreas and transverse mesocolon by a giant benign gastric ulcer is relatively uncommon, and literature contains a few reports of this complication. The preoperative histological diagnosis may be difficult or impossible. A 63-year-old female patient with a history of seven months of lack of appetite, asthenia, epigastric pain, a remarkable weight decrease, presenting at physical examination a large, smooth margins, not pulsating, quite fixed abdominal mass, is reported. Echography confirmed the presence of a mass of approximately 14 x 19 cm, with solid and liquid content. Biopsy showed inflammatory elements and cellular detriti. Barium enema showed that the mass compressed the descendent colon, which appeared dislocated. Tumor markers (CEA, CA 19-9, alpha-fetoprotein) where in the normal range. Endoscopy showed a giant angular ulcer whose bottom was represented by necrotic material (after the definitive histological examination it proved to be hepatic tissue). At TC scan of the abdomen, a remarkable thickening of the gastric wall was present. At surgery the stomach appeared increased in volume, with remarkably thickened walls, tenaciously sticking to II and III hepatic segments, to the pancreas and transverse mesocolon. A total gastrectomy was performed because of the depth of the ulcer penetration and the extension of the alteration of the gastric wall, even if the giant gastric ulcer, in the literature, is more frequently benign than malignant.

Eating Attitudes Test and culture: a study in northern and southern Italy.

The EAT (Eating Attitudes Test) has been widely used to compare eating morbidity in cultural groups and variations in it have been taken as indicative of cultural differences. This study assumed the existence of cultural differences between the north and the south of Italy. The EAT scores of female students from a northern and a southern Italian high school were compared. They were both higher than in other European studies, though there were no significant differences between the two groups. The result could be due to sampling limitations, but could also indicate that the EAT is not a reliable yardstick of cultural differences.