[Anaesthesia, a process common to all living organisms]. / L'anesthésie, un processus commun à tout le vivant.

Because of their interest in medicine, most studies of anaesthesia focus on the nervous system of metazoans, and the fact that any life form can be anaesthetised is often underlooked. If electrical signalling is an essential phenomenon for the success of animals, it appears to be widespread beyond metazoans. Indeed, anaesthesia targets Na+/Ca2+ voltage-gated channels that exist in a wide variety of species and originate from ancestral channels that predate eukaryotes in the course of evolution. The fact that the anaesthetic capacity that leads to loss of sensitivity is common to all phyla may lead to two hypotheses: to be investigated is the evolutionary maintenance of the ability to be anaesthetised due to an adaptive advantage or to a simple intrinsic defect in ion channels? The study of anaesthesia in organisms phylogenetically distant from animals opens up promising prospects for the discovery of new anaesthetic treatments. Moreover, it should also lead to a better understanding of a still poorly understood phenomenon that yet unifies all living organisms. We hope that this new understanding of the unity of life will help humans to assume their responsibilities towards all species, at a time when we are threatening biodiversity with mass extinction.

Title: L'anesthésie, un processus commun à tout le vivant. Abstract: Du fait de leur intérêt en médecine, la majeure partie des études actuelles sur les anesthésiques se concentrent sur le système nerveux des animaux et négligent le fait que toute forme de vie peut être anesthésiée. En effet, l'anesthésie cible des canaux dépendants du voltage, canaux qui existent dans un grand nombre d'espèces diverses et qui proviennent de canaux ancestraux antérieurs à l'apparition même des eucaryotes. La question demeure : le maintien au cours de l'évolution de la capacité à être anesthésié est-il dû à un avantage adaptatif ou à un simple défaut intrinsèque des canaux ioniques ? Le regain d'intérêt actuel pour les modèles non animaux ouvre l'espoir non seulement de découvrir de nouvelles molécules anesthésiantes, mais aussi de progresser dans notre connaissance fondamentale de ce phénomène encore mal compris.

Our sisters the plants? notes from phylogenetics and botany on plant kinship blindness.

Before the upheaval brought about by phylogenetic classification, classical taxonomy separated living beings into two distinct kingdoms, animals and plants. Rooted in 'naturalist' cosmology, Western science has built its theoretical apparatus on this dichotomy mostly based on ancient Aristotelian ideas. Nowadays, despite the adoption of the Darwinian paradigm that unifies living organisms as a kinship, the concept of the "scale of beings" continues to structure our analysis and understanding of living species. Our aim is to combine developments in phylogeny, recent advances in biology, and renewed interest in plant agency to craft an interdisciplinary stance on the living realm. The lines at the origin of plant or animal have a common evolutionary history dating back to about 3.9 Ga, separating only 1.6 Ga ago. From a phylogenetic perspective of living species history, plants and animals belong to sister groups. With recent data related to the field of Plant Neurobiology, our aim is to discuss some socio-cultural obstacles, mainly in Western naturalist epistemology, that have prevented the integration of living organisms as relatives, while suggesting a few avenues inspired by practices principally from other ontologies that could help overcome these obstacles and build bridges between different ways of connecting to life.