Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 13: 333, 2014 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25551459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important opportunistic, mainly nosocomial pathogen that emerged in the last decades worldwide. Due to its inherent extended antibiotic resistance, therapeutic options are strongly limited. New resistance mechanisms in S. maltophilia make antibiotic therapy even more difficult. The aim of our study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance of S. maltophilia isolates collected in our laboratory and to reveal related clinical background. METHOD: Consecutive non-duplicate S. maltophilia isolates (n = 160) were collected in a three-year period. Conventional methods, automated identification system and MALDI-TOF MS was used for identification, ERIC-PCR for genetic relationship analysis and broth microdilution method to determine the susceptibility for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, colistin, doxycycline and tigecycline. Clinical final reports were used retrospectively to collect clinical information. RESULTS: ERIC-PCR revealed large heterogeneity. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin were found to be the most effective agents with MIC50/MIC90 0.5/1, 0.25/1, 1/2 mg/l, respectively. Seventy percent of patients with S. maltophilia infection were treated in intensive care units. All-cause mortality rate was 45%. Nearly 70% of the isolates were collected from polymicrobial infections/colonizations. CONCLUSIONS: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is the most potent antibiotic agent against S. maltophilia. In case of SXT hypersensitivity, intolerance or resistance, fluoroquinolones are alternative therapeutic options. Missing clinical breakpoints, consensus antibiotic susceptibility testing guidelines and clinical trials make the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing results difficult. The indirect pathogenicity of S. maltophilia in polymicrobial infections or colonizations has to be taken into consideration.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/drug effects , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Child , Child, Preschool , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/mortality , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Humans , Hungary , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Molecular Typing , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Survival Analysis , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
2.
J Clin Virol ; 55(2): 140-6, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22841750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The availability of rotavirus vaccines has resulted in an intensification of post vaccine strain surveillance efforts worldwide to gain information on the impact of vaccines on prevalence of circulating rotavirus strains. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the distribution of human rotavirus G and P types in Hungary is reported. In addition, the VP4 and VP7 genes of G1P[8] strains were sequenced to monitor if vaccine-derived strains were introduced and/or some strains/lineages were selected against. STUDY DESIGN: The study was conducted in 8 geographic areas of Hungary between 2007 and 2011. Rotavirus positive stool samples were collected from diarrheic patients mostly <5 years of age. Viral RNA was amplified by multiplex genotyping RT-PCR assay, targeting the medically most important G and P types. When needed, sequencing of the VP7 and VP4 genes was performed. RESULTS: In total, 2380 strains were genotyped. During the 5-year surveillance we observed the dominating prevalence of genotype G1P[8] (44.87%) strains, followed by G4P[8] (23.4%), G2P[4] (14.75%) and G9P[8] (6.81%) genotypes. Uncommon strains were identified in a low percentage of samples (4.12%). Phylogenetic analysis of 318 G1P[8] strains identified 55 strains similar to the Rotarix strain (nt sequence identities; VP7, up to 97.9%; VP4, up to 98.5%) although their vaccine origin was unlikely. CONCLUSIONS: Current vaccines would have protected against the majority of identified rotavirus genotypes. A better understanding of the potential long-term effect of vaccine use on epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics of co-circulating wild type strains requires continuous strain surveillance.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antigens, Viral/genetics , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Child , Child, Preschool , Feces/virology , Female , Genotype , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics , Rotavirus/genetics , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...