Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Audiol ; 58(11): 704-716, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31154863

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine if the auditory middle latency responses (AMLR), auditory late latency response (ALLR) and auditory P300 were sensitive to auditory processing disorder (APD) and listening difficulties in children, and further to elucidate mechanisms regarding level of neurobiological problems in the central auditory nervous system. Design: Three-group, repeated measure design. Study sample: Forty-six children aged 8-14 years were divided into three groups: children with reported listening difficulties fulfilling APD diagnostic criteria, children with reported listening difficulties not fulfilling APD diagnostic criteria and normally hearing children. Results: AMLR Na latency and P300 latency and amplitude were sensitive to listening difficulties. No other auditory evoked potential (AEP) measures were sensitive to listening difficulties, and no AEP measures were sensitive to APD only. Moderate correlations were observed between P300 latency and amplitude and the behavioural AP measures of competing words, frequency patterns, duration patterns and dichotic digits. Conclusions: Impaired thalamo-cortical (bottom up) and neurocognitive function (top-down) may contribute to difficulties discriminating speech and non-speech sounds. Cognitive processes involved in conscious recognition, attention and discrimination of the acoustic characteristics of the stimuli could contribute to listening difficulties in general, and to APD in particular.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/physiopathology , Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Child , Female , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Male
2.
Int J Audiol ; 58(5): 301-310, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849269

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) may serve as a clinical tool to evaluate the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex, which is thought to aid speech discrimination (particularly in noise) by selectively inhibiting cochlear amplification. The present study aimed to determine if contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) suppression was present in a clinical sample of children with listening difficulties with and without auditory processing disorder (APD). DESIGN: A three-group, repeated measure design was used. STUDY SAMPLE: Forty three children aged 8-14 years underwent an auditory processing assessment and were divided into three groups: children with reported listening difficulties with APD, children with reported listening difficulties without APD, and children with normal hearing. APD was defined as per British Society of Audiology. RESULTS: TEOAE suppression was present in all three participant groups. No significant group, age or ear effects were observed for TEOAE suppression in dB or as a normalised index. CONCLUSION: Contralateral TEOAE suppression method could not be used as a clinical tool to identify APD in this study's participating children and did not support the hypothesised link between reduced MOC function and general listening difficulties in background noise in children with or without APD.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perceptual Disorders/physiopathology , Superior Olivary Complex/physiopathology , Vestibulocochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Adolescent , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...