ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose was to assess and compare self-reported oral health and oral and general health related quality of life (OHRQoL and HRQoL) in two groups of edentulous adults who reported dissatisfaction with their mandibular dentures, and who were treated with a conventional relining of this denture or by having it converted into an implant-retained one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects were randomly allocated into two equal groups, a relined conventional denture (RCD) group and an implant-retained overdenture (IOD) group. Data on demographics, oral health, OHRQoL, and HRQoL were recorded by means of a self-administered questionnaire at baseline, 3 months, and 2 years. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects completed the protocol, 28 in the IOD-group and 26 in the RCD-group. The IOD group reported significant improvement in oral health and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) sum score and all its domains after 3 months. The improvements remained stable at the 2-year control. The RCD group reported almost no significant improvements. Neither group reported improved HRQoL. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the findings from other RCT studies that to implant-retain the mandibular denture significantly improves self-reported oral health and OHRQoL. This treatment modality should be a minimum standard of care in complete denture wearers dissatisfied with their mandibular denture.
Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/psychology , Denture Rebasing , Denture, Complete, Lower/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Denture Rebasing/psychology , Denture Retention , Denture, Overlay , Disabled Persons/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous/psychology , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Health , Pain Measurement , Self Concept , Self Report , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent reports have questioned if metal sensitivity may arise from exposure to titanium. The objective of this study was to histologically evaluate non-perforated mucosa covering submerged maxillary titanium implants with regard to induced tissue reactions. METHODS: Thirteen patients, 21 to 69 years of age, without previous implants were included. After initial examination, the bone crest areas destined for dental implant placement were exposed, and threaded external hex dental implants were inserted. Prior to wound closure, a full mucosal tissue slice was biopsied from the edge of the mucoperiosteal flap (baseline). The patients were monitored monthly for 6 months. At the abutment connection, biopsies were taken by a 6-mm punch, altogether yielding 26 specimens. Tissue reactions were analyzed by coded histometric analysis at four defined areas at increasing distance from the oral epithelium, including ratios of inflammatory cells (IC)/epithelial cells, IC/fibroblasts, and number of dense particles. RESULTS: The stained sections portrayed gingival tissue with intact oral epithelium and connective tissue with variable accumulation of IC. Experimental biopsies demonstrated mineralized areas and dense particles of different sizes. Analysis of variance revealed a higher IC/fibroblast ratio for level 3 at baseline compared to level 3 at 6 months (P<0.01). Furthermore, a significant decrease in IC/fibroblast ratio was observed between levels 2 and 3 and 2 and 4 at 6 months (P<0.001). The connective tissue level facing the cover screw contained the highest number of dense particles (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue sensitivity reactions to titanium implants were not disclosed. All 6-month biopsies contained dense particles that were most likely metals.