ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the management of hip fractures in a German maximum care hospital and compares these data to evidence-based standard and practice in 180 hospitals participating in the UK National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and 16 hospitals participating in the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD). This is the first study directly comparing the management of hip fractures between 3 separate health-care systems within Europe. METHODS: Electronic medical data were collected retrospectively describing the care pathway of elderly patients with a hip fracture admitted to a large trauma unit in the south of Germany "University Hospital Freiburg" (UHF). The audit evaluated demographics, postoperative outcome, and the adherence to the 6 "Blue Book" standards of care. These data were directly compared with the data from the UK NHFD and the IHFD acquired from 180 and 16 hospitals, respectively. RESULTS: At 36 hours, 95.8% of patients had received surgery in UHF, compared to 71.5% in the NHFD and 58% of patients in the IHFD. The rate of in-hospital mortality was 4.7% compared to 7.1% in the NHFD and 5% in the IHFD. The mean average acute length of stay was 13.4 days compared to 16.4 days in the NHFD and 20 days in the IHFD. Reoperation rates are 3.3% compared to 1% in the NHFD and 1.1% in the IHFD; 50.5% of patients were discharged on bone protection medication, compared to 47% in the IHFD and 79.3% in the UK NHFD. DISCUSSION: Despite uniformly acknowledged evidence-based treatment guidelines, the management of hip fractures remains heterogeneous within Europe. CONCLUSION: These data show that different areas of the hip fracture care pathway in Germany, England, and Ireland, respectively, show room for improvement in light of the growing socioeconomic burden these countries are expected to face.
ABSTRACT
Dynamic osteosynthesis of proximal femur fractures facilitates compression at the fracture site through distal glide of the femoral head load carrier in the intramedullary nail. Modern implants are currently designed according to diverse gliding principles. The aim of this study was to compare the sliding mechanisms of different types of nails. As in other similar mechanical studies the load patterns occurring around the femoral head load carrier and the intramedullary nail under full load were simulated for three different types of intramedullary nail - PFNA, Targon PFT and Trigen Intertan. The load necessary to trigger distal displacement of the femoral head implant in the nail was determined. The lengths of the load carriers were varied. For the three lengths of load carrier, mechanical testing showed that the Targon PFT started to slide at a significantly lower load compared to the other two implants. Comparison of the PFNA and Trigen Intertan in terms of load to dynamization for 77 mm carriers revealed a significantly lower load for the PFNA. Slide efficacy for the PFNA and the Trigen Intertan was found to improve as the length of the blade/screw was shortened. The dynamization properties of the Targon PFT with its cylindrical sliding mechanism, similar to the DHS, were far better compared to the PFNA and the Trigen Intertan that have more complex sliding actions. Since theoretical considerations indicate that a less efficient gliding action leads to a higher complication rate, implants of the next generation should be optimized in this regard.
