Prevalence of serum IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among clinic staff.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic threatens health care providers and society. For planning of treatment capacities, it is of major importance to obtain reliable information on infection and fatality rates of the novel coronavirus. A German community study, the so-called Heinsberg study, found a 5-fold higher infection rate (and thus a remarkably lower fatality rate) than the officially reported cases suggest. We were interested to examine the SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibody status among clinic staff of a large neurological center in Northern Germany. Blood samples and questionnaires (demographic data, medical history) were collected pseudonymously. In total, 406 out of 525 (77.3%) of our employees participated in the study. The infection rate among the staff was as high as 2.7%. Including drop-outs (missing questionnaire but test result available), the infection rate was even higher (2.9%). Only 36% of the positively tested employees did suffer from flu-like symptoms in 2020. None of the nurses-having closest and longest contact to patients-were found to be positive. Despite the fact that the infection rate among clinic staff may not be directly compared to the situation in the surrounding county (due to different testing procedures), one might hypothesize that the infection rate could be more than 30-fold higher than the number of officially reported cases for the county of Hameln-Pyrmont. The high rate of IgG-positive, asymptomatic healthcare workers might help to overcome fears in daily work.

[MRSA screening in early neurological and neurosurgical rehabilitation]. / MRSA-Screening in der neurologisch-neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation.

Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are of major economic and health-related importance to early neurological and neurosurgical rehabilitation. It is crucial to identify MRSA-carriers as soon as possible upon admission in order to prevent transmissions and to initiate contact precautions and decolonization. The present study focuses on validity of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to identify MRSA genetic material from nasopharyngeal samples (BD MAX MRSA XT, BD Diagnostics, Heidelberg, Germany) of early neurological and neurosurgical rehabilitation patients. PCR-results were compared to gold standard (culture). In 2013, 66 patients were tested using PCR and incubation within one week after admission. Sensitivity of PCR was 84.6 %, specificity 86.6 %. Positive predictive value (PPV) was only 61.1 %, while negative predictive value was as high as 95.8 %. In 39 cases, PCR and subsequent culture were done within one day, leading to a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 90.3 %. In this subgroup, PPV was 72.7 %, NPV 100 %. The results from the study suggest that incubation should quickly follow a positive PCR finding (within 24 hours) in order to verify MRSA colonization. High NPV (95.8 resp. 100 %) indicate that PCR negative patients very likely are not colonized with MRSA. A positive PCR test is less reliable (due to false positive results) and should be followed by incubation in due course in order to avoid unnecessary contact precautions.

Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, screening colonoscopy was first established in 2002 as part of the national cancer screening program. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether colorectal cancer (CRC) survival differs when CRC is diagnosed by screening colonoscopy (S-CRC) versus diagnostic colonoscopy (D-CRC). DESIGN: Long-term, retrospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Study centers: 10 private gastroenterology practices in Germany. PATIENTS: A total of 60 patients diagnosed with CRC during screening colonoscopy and 252 patients during diagnostic colonoscopy in 2002, 2003, and 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Survival of patients up to December 2013. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) follow-up time was 81.0 (± 40.1) months. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages I and II were found more often in S-CRC (81.6%) compared with D-CRC (59.9%; P < .002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly reduced overall survival for patients with D-CRC (mean [± SD] 86.9 [± 3.0] months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0-92.8) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 107.1 [± 4.9] months; 95% CI, 97.4-116.9; P = .003). When deaths not related to CRC were excluded, survival was still shorter for D-CRC patients (mean [± SD] 89.4 [± 3.0] months; 95% CI, 83.5-95.4) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 109.6 [± 4.7] months; 95% CI, 100.2-119.0; P = .004). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design. CONCLUSION: In this long-term, retrospective study, patients with CRC diagnosed during screening colonoscopy lived significantly longer when compared with patients with CRC diagnosed during diagnostic colonoscopy.