PAH release during water desorption, supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, and field bioremediation.

Removal rates of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from manufactured gas plant (MGP) soils were determined using water desorption for 120 days and mild supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (SFE) for 200 min. Both techniques were used to compare the changes in desorption rates for individual PAHs from untreated and treated soils that were obtained from a field biotreatment unit after 58, 147, and 343 days. Water desorption profiles (plotted in days) and SFE profiles (plotted in minutes) were very similar regardless of whether a PAH was rapidly or slowly removed. Water and SFE profiles were fit with a simple two-site (fast and slow) model to obtain the fraction of each PAH that was rapidly released (F). There was agreement between the F values obtained from water desorption and SFE for PAHs ranging from naphthalene to benzo[a]pyrene from all soils, with an overall correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.81. F values from water desorption and SFE also agreed with the actual removal of PAHs obtained after 147 and 343 days of field remediation (r2 ca. 0.80). The use of shorter desorption times (2-4 days for water and 20-40 min for SFE) allowed F values to be estimated for all PAHs and showed excellent agreement with the removal of individual PAHs obtained with 147-343 days of field remediation (r2 > 0.9). The comparisons indicate that short-term SFE can provide a reasonable estimate of the fraction of a PAH that is readily released and available for microbial treatment.

Comparisons of soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix.

Extractions of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil from a former manufactured gas plant site were performed with a Soxhlet apparatus (18 h), by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (50 min at 100 degrees C), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) (1 h at 150 degrees C with pure CO2), and subcritical water (1 h at 250 degrees C, or 30 min at 300 degrees C). Although minor differences in recoveries for some PAHs resulted from the different methods, quantitative agreement between all of the methods was generally good. However, the extract quality differed greatly. The organic solvent extracts (Soxhlet and PLE) were much darker, while the extracts from subcritical water (collected in toluene) were orange, and the extracts from SFE (collected in CH2Cl2) were light yellow. The organic solvent extracts also yielded more artifact peaks in the gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry and GC-flame ionization detection chromatograms, especially compared to supercritical CO2. Based on elemental analysis (carbon and nitrogen) of the soil residues after each extraction, subcritical water, PLE, and Soxhlet extraction had poor selectivity for PAHs versus bulk soil organic matter (approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of the bulk soil organic matter was extracted along with the PAHs), while SFE with pure CO2 removed only 8% of the bulk organic matrix. Selectivities for different compound classes also vary with extraction method. Extraction of urban air particulate matter with organic solvents yields very high concentrations of n- and branched alkanes (approximately C18 to C30) from diesel exhaust as well as lower levels of PAHs, and no selectivity between the bulk alkanes and PAHs is obtained during organic solvent extraction. Some moderate selectivity with supercritical CO2 can be achieved by first extracting the bulk alkanes at mild conditions, followed by stronger conditions to extract the remaining PAHs, i.e., the least polar organics are the easiest organics to extract with pure CO2. In direct contrast, subcritical water prefers the more polar analytes, i.e., PAHs were efficiently extracted from urban air particulates at 250 degrees C, with little or no extraction of the alkanes. Finally, recent work has demonstrated that many pollutant molecules become "sequestered" as they age for decades in the environment (i.e., more tightly bound to soil particles and less available to organisms or transport). Therefore, it may be more important for an extraction method to only recover pollutant molecules that are environmentally-relevant, rather than the conventional attempts to extract all pollutant molecules regardless of how tightly bound they are to the soil or sediment matrix. Initial work comparing SFE extraction behavior using mild to strong conditions with bioremediation behavior of PAHs shows great promise to develop extraction methodology to measure environmentally-relevant concentrations of pollutants in addition to their total concentrations.

Static subcritical water extraction with simultaneous solid-phase extraction for determining polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on environmental solids.

A rapid and very simple method for extracting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soils, sediments, and air particulate matter has been developed by coupling static subcritical water extraction with styrene-divinylbenzene (SDB-XC) extraction discs. Soil, water, and the SDB-XC disc are placed in a sealed extraction cell, heated to 250 degrees C for 15 to 60 min, cooled, and the PAHs recovered from the disc with acetone/methylene chloride. If the cells are mixed during heating, all PAHs with molecular weights from 128 to 276 are quantitatively (>90%) extracted and collected on the sorbent disc and are then recovered by shaking with acetone/methylene chloride. After water extraction, the sorbent discs can be stored in autosampler vials without loss of the PAHs, thus providing a convenient method of shipping PAH extracts from field sites to the analytical laboratory. The method gives good quantitative agreement with standard Soxhlet extraction, and with certified reference materials for PAH concentrations on soil, sediment (SRM 1944), and air particulate matter (SRM 1649a).

Solid-phase microextraction with pH adjustment for the determination of aromatic acids and bases in water.

Adjusting the pH of water samples before performing solid-phase microextraction (SPME) analysis can be used to selectively extract organic acids (at pH 2) and bases (at pH 12). Sorption behavior of test organics is predictable based on the acid dissociation constant in water. In general, polyacrylate (PA) and Carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB) show substantially higher fiber/water sorption coefficients (Kd values) than a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated fiber. Gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) detection limits with the CW-DVB sorbent are approximately 0.5 to 10 ng/ml in a 2-ml water sample for a variety of aromatic amines, phenols, and chlorinated phenols, and are approximately 1 to 50 ng/ml for the same solutes using the PA sorbent. However, the PA fiber is more selective (depending on the water pH) for the acid or base components than the CW-DVB fiber. With proper pH adjustment, the recovery of spiked aromatic amines and phenols from a surface wetlands water ranged from 73 to 118% of the known values, with a precision (R.S.D.) of approximately 5 to 20%. SPME quantitation of phenols in a coal gasification wastewater using a PA fiber also gave excellent agreement with conventional methylene chloride extraction, although continued use of a single fiber with this wastewater led to poorer precision.