Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 49
Filter
1.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 22(6): 632-4, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16418834

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The authors report a case of three brothers. Two of these siblings presented with congenital growth hormone deficiency and Chiari I malformation. The third and younger brother has been found not to have growth hormone deficiency or the Chiari I malformation. RESULTS: Sparse cases of these two clinical occurrences have been reported. Further, the posterior cranial fossa has been determined to be altered in patients with Chiari I malformation and growth hormone deficiency. CONCLUSION: Our current case reports strengthen the association between these two pathological entities and are, to our knowledge, the first description of both defects in siblings.


Subject(s)
Arnold-Chiari Malformation/complications , Growth Hormone/deficiency , Siblings , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/pathology , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Phospholipids/metabolism , Spinal Cord/pathology , Spinal Cord/surgery
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 147(3): 299-302; discussion 302, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15662566

ABSTRACT

The authors present a case of a child with dwarfism that was noted to be developmentally delayed. Imaging revealed atlantoaxial instability, occult spinal dysraphism, and a presacral mass. Histopathology of the presacral lesion was that of a myxopapillary ependymoma with epidermoid cyst. We believe this to be the first report in the extant medical literature of this constellation of findings in the same patient. However, there are rare reports indicating a possible association of occult spinal dysraphism and the simultaneous occurrence of spinal ependymomas. Further case reports are necessary to discern whether these pathological entities are true low rate associations that the clinician should consider in their evaluation of these patients.


Subject(s)
Dwarfism/complications , Ependymoma/complications , Epidermal Cyst/complications , Pelvic Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Dysraphism/complications , Cauda Equina/pathology , Cervical Atlas/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Atlas/pathology , Child, Preschool , Ependymoma/pathology , Ependymoma/surgery , Epidermal Cyst/pathology , Epidermal Cyst/surgery , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures , Pelvic Neoplasms/pathology , Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiography , Reoperation , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Sacrum/pathology , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/pathology , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/surgery , Spinal Dysraphism/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Dysraphism/pathology , Spinal Fusion , Syringomyelia/etiology , Syringomyelia/pathology
3.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S120-4, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431296

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Treatment options in the management of isolated fractures of the atlas are based on the specific atlas fracture type. It is recommended that isolated fractures of the atlas with an intact transverse atlantal ligament be treated with cervical immobilization alone. It is recommended that isolated fractures of the atlas with disruption of the transverse atlantal ligament be treated with either cervical immobilization alone or surgical fixation and fusion.


Subject(s)
Cervical Atlas/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Immobilization , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Critical Pathways/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
4.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S125-39, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431297

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: FRACTURES OF THE ODONTOID: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: Type II odontoid fractures in patients 50 years and older should be considered for surgical stabilization and fusion. OPTIONS: Type I, Type II, and Type III fractures may be managed initially with external cervical immobilization. Type II and Type III odontoid fractures should be considered for surgical fixation in cases of dens displacement of 5 mm or more, comminution of the odontoid fracture (Type IIA), and/or inability to achieve or maintain fracture alignment with external immobilization. TRAUMATIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS OF THE AXIS (HANGMAN'S FRACTURE): STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis may be managed initially with external immobilization in most cases. Surgical stabilization should be considered in cases of severe angulation of C2 on C3 (Francis Grade II and IV, Effendi Type II), disruption of the C2--C3 disc space (Francis Grade V, Effendi Type III), or inability to establish or maintain alignment with external immobilization. FRACTURES OF THE AXIS BODY (MISCELLANEOUS FRACTURES): STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: External immobilization is recommended for treatment of isolated fractures of the axis body.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal , Immobilization , Odontoid Process/injuries , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Adult , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Middle Aged , Odontoid Process/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
5.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S140-7, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431298

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Treatment of atlas-axis combination fractures based primarily on the specific characteristics of the axis fracture is recommended. External immobilization of most C1--C2 combination fractures is recommended. C1--Type II odontoid combination fractures with an atlantodens interval of 5 mm or more and C1--hangman's combination fractures with C2--C3 angulation of 11 degrees or more should be considered for surgical stabilization and fusion. In some cases, the surgical technique must be modified as a result of loss of the integrity of the ring of the atlas.


Subject(s)
Axis, Cervical Vertebra/injuries , Cervical Atlas/injuries , Immobilization , Odontoid Process/injuries , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Adult , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/surgery , Cervical Atlas/surgery , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Odontoid Process/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Fusion
6.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S148-55, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431299

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic guidelines. OPTIONS: Plain x-rays of the cervical spine (anteroposterior, open-mouth odontoid, and lateral) and plain dynamic lateral x-rays performed in flexion and extension are recommended. Tomography (computed or plain) and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the craniocervical junction may be considered. STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Patients with os odontoideum, either with or without C1--C2 instability, who have neither symptoms nor neurological signs may be managed with clinical and radiographic surveillance. Patients with os odontoideum, particularly with neurological symptoms and/or signs, and C1--C2 instability may be managed with posterior C1--C2 internal fixation and fusion. Postoperative halo immobilization as an adjunct to posterior internal fixation and fusion is recommended unless successful C1--C2 transarticular screw fixation and fusion can be accomplished. Occipitocervical fusion with or without C1 laminectomy may be considered in patients with os odontoideum who have irreducible cervicomedullary compression and/or evidence of associated occipitoatlantal instability. Transoral decompression may be considered in patients with os odontoideum who have irreducible ventral cervicomedullary compression.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Odontoid Process/injuries , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Immobilization , Joint Instability/surgery , Odontoid Process/pathology , Odontoid Process/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Cord Compression/diagnosis , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Spinal Injuries/surgery
7.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S156-65, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431300

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: SUBAXIAL CERVICAL FACET DISLOCATION INJURIES: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to recommend treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Closed or open reduction of subaxial cervical facet dislocation injuries is recommended. Treatment of subaxial cervical facet dislocation injuries with rigid external immobilization, anterior arthrodesis with plate fixation, or posterior arthrodesis with plate or rod or interlaminar clamp fixation is recommended. Treatment of subaxial cervical facet dislocation injuries with prolonged bedrest in traction is recommended if more contemporary treatment options are not available. SUBAXIAL CERVICAL INJURIES EXCLUDING FACET DISLOCATION INJURIES: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to recommend treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Closed or open reduction of subluxations or displaced subaxial cervical spinal fractures is recommended. Treatment of subaxial cervical spinal injuries with external immobilization, anterior arthrodesis with plate fixation, or posterior arthrodesis with plate or rod fixation is recommended.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Immobilization , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
8.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S166-72, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431301

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Intensive care unit (or other monitored setting) management of patients with acute central cervical spinal cord injuries, particularly patients with severe neurological deficits, is recommended. Medical management, including cardiac, hemodynamic, and respiratory monitoring, and maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first week after injury to improve spinal cord perfusion is recommended. Early reduction of fracture-dislocation injuries is recommended. Surgical decompression of the compressed spinal cord, particularly if the compression is focal and anterior, is recommended.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Acute Disease , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Critical Care , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Cord Compression/diagnosis , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/surgery
9.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S173-8, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431302

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic guidelines. OPTIONS: Conventional angiography or magnetic resonance angiography is recommended for the diagnosis of vertebral artery injury after nonpenetrating cervical trauma in patients who have complete cervical spinal cord injuries, fracture through the foramen transversarium, facet dislocation, and/or vertebral subluxation. STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Anticoagulation with intravenous heparin is recommended for patients with vertebral artery injury who have evidence of posterior circulation stroke. Either observation or treatment with anticoagulation in patients with vertebral artery injuries and evidence of posterior circulation ischemia is recommended. Observation in patients with vertebral artery injuries and no evidence of posterior circulation ischemia is recommended.


Subject(s)
Vertebral Artery/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Observation , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency/diagnosis , Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis
11.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S7-17, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431281

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: All trauma patients with a cervical spinal column injury or with a mechanism of injury having the potential to cause cervical spine injury should be immobilized at the scene and during transport by using one of several available methods. A combination of a rigid cervical collar and supportive blocks on a backboard with straps is effective in limiting motion of the cervical spine and is recommended. The long-standing practice of attempted cervical spine immobilization using sandbags and tape alone is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Emergency Medical Services , Immobilization , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Admission , Practice Guidelines as Topic
13.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S18-20, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431282

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Expeditious and careful transport of patients with acute cervical spine or spinal cord injuries is recommended, from the site of injury by the most appropriate mode of transportation available to the nearest capable definitive care medical facility.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Transportation of Patients , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Neurologic Examination , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Risk Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/prevention & control
14.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S21-9, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431283

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support neurological examination standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support neurological examination guidelines. OPTIONS: The American Spinal Injury Association international standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury are recommended as the preferred neurological examination tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and care of patients with acute spinal cord injuries. FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENT: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support functional outcome assessment standards. GUIDELINES: The Functional Independence Measure is recommended as the functional outcome assessment tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and care of patients with acute spinal cord injuries. OPTIONS: The modified Barthel index is recommended as a functional outcome assessment tool for clinicians involved in the assessment and care of patients with acute spinal cord injuries.


Subject(s)
Neurologic Examination/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Activities of Daily Living/classification , Acute Disease , Disability Evaluation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/classification
15.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S30-5, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431284

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine is not recommended in trauma patients who are awake, alert, and not intoxicated, who are without neck pain or tenderness, and who do not have significant associated injuries that detract from their general evaluation.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Neurologic Examination , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging
16.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S36-43, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431285

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: A three-view cervical spine series (anteroposterior, lateral, and odontoid views) is recommended for radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine in patients who are symptomatic after traumatic injury. This should be supplemented with computed tomography (CT) to further define areas that are suspicious or not well visualized on the plain cervical x-rays. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: It is recommended that cervical spine immobilization in awake patients with neck pain or tenderness and normal cervical spine x-rays (including supplemental CT as necessary) be discontinued after either a) normal and adequate dynamic flexion/extension radiographs, or b) a normal magnetic resonance imaging study is obtained within 48 hours of injury. Cervical spine immobilization in obtunded patients with normal cervical spine x-rays (including supplemental CT as necessary) may be discontinued a) after dynamic flexion/extension studies performed under fluoroscopic guidance, or b) after a normal magnetic resonance imaging study is obtained within 48 hours of injury, or c) at the discretion of the treating physician.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Cervical Vertebrae/pathology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Neurologic Examination , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S63-72, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431289

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Treatment with methylprednisolone for either 24 or 48 hours is recommended as an option in the treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injuries that should be undertaken only with the knowledge that the evidence suggesting harmful side effects is more consistent than any suggestion of clinical benefit. GM-1 GANGLIOSIDE: STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injuries with GM-1 ganglioside is recommended as an option without demonstrated clinical benefit.


Subject(s)
G(M1) Ganglioside/administration & dosage , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Spinal Cord Injuries/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Cervical Vertebrae , Critical Pathways/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , G(M1) Ganglioside/adverse effects , Humans , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
18.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S58-62, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431288

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) should be avoided if possible or corrected as soon as possible after acute spinal cord injury. Maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first 7 days after acute spinal cord injury to improve spinal cord perfusion is recommended.


Subject(s)
Hypotension/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Ischemia/prevention & control , Cervical Vertebrae , Critical Care/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications
19.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S73-80, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431290

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: Prophylactic treatment of thromboembolism in patients with severe motor deficits due to spinal cord injury is recommended. The use of low-molecular-weight heparins, rotating beds, adjusted dose heparin, or a combination of modalities is recommended as a prophylactic treatment strategy. Low-dose heparin in combination with pneumatic compression stockings or electrical stimulation is recommended as a prophylactic treatment strategy. GUIDELINES: Low-dose heparin therapy alone is not recommended as a prophylactic treatment strategy. Oral anticoagulation alone is not recommended as a prophylactic treatment strategy. OPTIONS: Duplex Doppler ultrasound, impedance plethysmography, and venography are recommended for use as diagnostic tests for deep venous thrombosis in the spinal cord-injured patient population. A 3-month duration of prophylactic treatment for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is recommended. Vena cava filters are recommended for patients who do not respond to anticoagulation or who are not candidates for anticoagulation therapy and/or mechanical devices.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Bandages , Beds , Cervical Vertebrae , Combined Modality Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis
20.
Neurosurgery ; 50(3 Suppl): S81-4, 2002 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431291

ABSTRACT

STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: Nutritional support of patients with spinal cord injuries is recommended. Energy expenditure is best determined by indirect calorimetry in these patients because equation estimates of energy expenditure and subsequent caloric need tend to be inaccurate.


Subject(s)
Nutritional Support/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Energy Intake/physiology , Energy Metabolism/physiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...