Greater than recommended stiffness and power setting of a stance-phase powered leg prosthesis can improve step-to-step transition work and effective foot length ratio during walking in people with transtibial amputation.

People with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using a passive-elastic prosthesis exhibit lower positive affected leg trailing work (ALtrail Wpos) and a greater magnitude of negative unaffected leg leading work (ULlead Wneg) during walking than non-amputees, which may increase joint pain and osteoarthritis risk in the unaffected leg. People with TTA using a stance-phase powered prosthesis (e.g., BiOM, Ottobock, Duderstadt, Germany) walk with increased ALtrail Wpos and potentially decreased magnitude of ULlead Wneg compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. The BiOM includes a passive-elastic prosthesis with a manufacturer-recommended stiffness category and can be tuned to different power settings, which may change ALtrail Wpos, ULlead Wneg, and the prosthesis effective foot length ratio (EFLR). Thirteen people with TTA walked using 16 different prosthetic stiffness category and power settings on a level treadmill at 0.75-1.75 m/s. We constructed linear mixed effects models to determine the effects of stiffness category and power settings on ALtrail Wpos, ULlead Wneg, and EFLR and hypothesized that decreased stiffness and increased power would increase ALtrail Wpos, not change and decrease ULlead Wneg magnitude, and decrease and not change prosthesis EFLR, respectively. We found there was no significant effect of stiffness category on ALtrail Wpos but increased stiffness reduced ULlead Wneg magnitude, perhaps due to a 0.02 increase in prosthesis EFLR compared to the least stiff category. Furthermore, we found that use of the BiOM with 10% and 20% greater than recommended power increased ALtrail Wpos and decreased ULlead Wneg magnitude at 0.75-1.00 m/s. However, prosthetic power setting depended on walking speed so that use of the BiOM increased ULlead Wneg magnitude at 1.50-1.75 m/s compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. Ultimately, our results suggest that at 0.75-1.00 m/s, prosthetists should utilize the BiOM attached to a passive-elastic prosthesis with an increased stiffness category and power settings up to 20% greater than recommended based on biological ankle values. This prosthetic configuration can allow people with unilateral transtibial amputation to increase ALtrail Wpos and minimize ULlead Wneg magnitude, which could reduce joint pain and osteoarthritis risk in the unaffected leg and potentially lower the metabolic cost of walking.

Effects of prosthetic stiffness and added mass on metabolic power and asymmetry in female runners with a leg amputation.

Similar to nonamputees, female athletes with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using running-specific leg prostheses (RSPs) may have worse running economy and higher rates of running-related injury than male athletes. Optimizing RSP configuration for female athletes could improve running economy and minimize biomechanical asymmetry, which has been associated with running-related injury. Nine females with a TTA ran at 2.5 m/s while we measured metabolic rates and ground reaction forces. Subjects used an RSP with a manufacturer-recommended stiffness category, one category less stiff and two categories less stiff than recommended. Use of an RSP two categories less stiff resulted in 3.0% lower net metabolic power (P = 0.04), 7.8% lower affected leg stiffness (P = 6.01 × 10-4), increased contact time asymmetry (P = 0.04), and decreased stance average vertical ground reaction force asymmetry (P = 0.04) compared with a recommended stiffness category RSP. Lower RSP stiffness (kN/m) values were associated with lower net metabolic power (P = 0.02), lower affected leg stiffness (P = 1.36 × 10-4), longer affected leg contact time (P = 1.46 × 10-4), and similar affected leg peak and stance-average vertical ground reaction force compared with higher RSP stiffness values. Subjects then used the RSP stiffness category that elicited the lowest net metabolic power with 100 g, 200 g, and 300 g added distally. We found no significant effects of added mass on net metabolic power, biomechanics, or asymmetry. These results suggest that female runners with a TTA could decrease metabolic power during running while minimizing biomechanical asymmetries, which have been associated with running-related injury, by using an RSP two categories less stiff than manufacturer recommended.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Females with unilateral transtibial amputation can improve running performance through reductions in net metabolic power by using a running-specific prosthesis (RSP) that is less stiff than manufacturer-recommended. Lower RSP stiffness values are associated with greater leg stiffness and contact time asymmetry, and lower stance-average vertical ground reaction force asymmetry. However, we found that adding mass to the RSP did not affect net metabolic power and stance-phase biomechanical asymmetries during running.

The Effect of Unequal Crank Arm Lengths and Cycling-Specific Prostheses for Recreational Riders with a Transtibial Amputation.

PURPOSE: We determined the effects of shorter affected side crank arm lengths and cycling with two different prostheses on joint and crank power, asymmetry, and net efficiency. METHODS: 12 participants with a TTA rode at 1.5 W·kg -1 with equal (175 mm) and shorter affected side crank arms (160, 165, 170 mm) using a daily-use prosthesis and CSP. We used statistical parametric mapping to determine differences in instantaneous joint and crank power between prostheses, and linear mixed-effects models to compare average joint and crank power, asymmetry, and net efficiency. RESULTS: Shorter affected side crank arm lengths reduced the magnitude of peak positive (p ≤ 0.001) and negative (p < 0.001) crank power on the affected side. Use of a CSP increased the magnitude of peak positive knee power (p < 0.001) and decreased the magnitude of peak negative crank power (p < 0.001) on the affected side compared to a daily-use prosthesis. Shorter affected side crank arm lengths while using a CSP reduced average hip joint (p = 0.014) and hip transfer (p = 0.025) power asymmetry from 35% to 20% and 118% to 62%, respectively. However, we found no significant differences in affected side average joint or crank power, knee joint or crank power asymmetry, or net efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Cycling at 1.5 W·kg -1 with unequal crank arm lengths and CSPs improves hip joint power and hip transfer power asymmetry but does not alter crank asymmetry or net efficiency for recreational cyclists with a TTA.

The contribution of lower-limb joint quasi-stiffness to theoretical leg stiffness during level, uphill and downhill running at different speeds.

Humans change joint quasi-stiffness (k joint) and leg stiffness (kleg) when running at different speeds on level ground and during uphill and downhill running. These mechanical properties can inform device designs for running such as footwear, exoskeletons and prostheses. We measured kinetics and kinematics from 17 runners (10 M; 7 F) at three speeds on 0°, ±2°, ±4° and ±6° slopes. We calculated ankle and knee k joint, the quotient of change in joint moment and angular displacement, and theoretical leg stiffness (klegT) based on the joint external moment arms and k joint. Runners increased k ankle at faster speeds (p < 0.01). Runners increased and decreased the ankle and knee contributions to klegT, respectively, by 2.89% per 1° steeper uphill slope (p < 0.01) during the first half of stance. Runners decreased and increased ankle and knee joint contributions to klegT, respectively, by 3.68% during the first half and 0.86% during the second half of stance per 1° steeper downhill slope (p < 0.01). Thus, biomimetic devices require stiffer k ankle for faster speeds, and greater ankle contributions and greater knee contributions to klegT during the first half of stance for steeper uphill and downhill slopes, respectively.

Low-profile prosthetic foot stiffness category and size, and shoes affect axial and torsional stiffness and hysteresis.

Introduction: Passive-elastic prosthetic feet are manufactured with numerical stiffness categories and prescribed based on the user's body mass and activity level, but mechanical properties, such as stiffness values and hysteresis are not typically reported. Since the mechanical properties of passive-elastic prosthetic feet and footwear can affect walking biomechanics of people with transtibial or transfemoral amputation, characterizing these properties can provide objective metrics for comparison and aid prosthetic foot prescription and design. Methods: We characterized axial and torsional stiffness values, and hysteresis of 33 categories and sizes of a commercially available passive-elastic prosthetic foot model [Össur low-profile (LP) Vari-flex] with and without a shoe. We assumed a greater numerical stiffness category would result in greater axial and torsional stiffness values but would not affect hysteresis. We hypothesized that a greater prosthetic foot length would not affect axial stiffness values or hysteresis but would result in greater torsional stiffness values. We also hypothesized that including a shoe would result in decreased axial and torsional stiffness values and greater hysteresis. Results: Prosthetic stiffness was better described by curvilinear than linear equations such that stiffness values increased with greater loads. In general, a greater numerical stiffness category resulted in increased heel, midfoot, and forefoot axial stiffness values, increased plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torsional stiffness values, and decreased heel, midfoot, and forefoot hysteresis. Moreover, for a given category, a longer prosthetic foot size resulted in decreased heel, midfoot, and forefoot axial stiffness values, increased plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torsional stiffness values, and decreased heel and midfoot hysteresis. In addition, adding a shoe to the prosthetic foot resulted in decreased heel and midfoot axial stiffness values, decreased plantarflexion torsional stiffness values, and increased heel, midfoot, and forefoot hysteresis. Discussion: Our results suggest that manufacturers should adjust the design of each category to ensure the mechanical properties are consistent across different sizes and highlight the need for prosthetists and researchers to consider the effects of shoes in combination with prostheses. Our results can be used to objectively compare the LP Vari-flex prosthetic foot to other prosthetic feet to inform their prescription, design, and use for people with a transtibial or transfemoral amputation.

The spring stiffness profile within a passive, full-leg exoskeleton affects lower-limb joint mechanics while hopping.

Passive, full-leg exoskeletons that act in parallel with the legs can reduce the metabolic power of bouncing gaits like hopping. However, the magnitude of metabolic power reduction depends on the spring stiffness profile of the exoskeleton and is presumably affected by how users adapt their lower-limb joint mechanics. We determined the effects of using a passive, full-leg exoskeleton with degressive (DG), linear (LN) and progressive (PG) stiffness springs on lower-limb joint kinematics and kinetics during stationary, bilateral hopping at 2.4 Hz. We found that the use of a passive, full-leg exoskeleton primarily reduced the muscle-tendon units (MTUs) contribution to overall joint moment and power at the ankle, followed by the knee, due to the average exoskeleton moment arm around each joint. The greatest reductions occurred with DG springs, followed by LN and PG stiffness springs, probably due to differences in elastic energy return. Moreover, the relative distribution of positive joint power remained unchanged when using a passive, full-leg exoskeleton compared with unassisted hopping. Passive, full-leg exoskeletons simultaneously assist multiple lower-limb joints and future assistive devices should consider the effects of spring stiffness profile in their design.

Maximum velocity and leg-specific ground reaction force production change with radius during flat curve sprinting.

Humans attain slower maximum velocity (vmax) on curves versus straight paths, potentially due to centripetal ground reaction force (GRF) production, and this depends on curve radius. Previous studies found GRF production differences between an athlete's inside versus outside leg relative to the center of the curve. Further, sprinting clockwise (CW) versus counterclockwise (CCW) slows vmax. We determined vmax, step kinematics and individual leg GRF on a straight path and on curves with 17.2 and 36.5 m radii for nine (8 male, 1 female) competitive sprinters running CW and CCW and compared vmax with three predictive models. We combined CW and CCW directions and found that vmax slowed by 10.0±2.4% and 4.1±1.6% (P<0.001) for the 17.2 and 36.5 m radius curves versus the straight path, respectively. vmax values from the predictive models were up to 3.5% faster than the experimental data. Contact length was 0.02 m shorter and stance average resultant GRF was 0.10 body weights (BW) greater for the 36.5 versus 17.2 m radius curves (P<0.001). Stance average centripetal GRF was 0.10 BW greater for the inside versus outside leg (P<0.001) on the 36.5 m radius curve. Stance average vertical GRF was 0.21 BW (P<0.001) and 0.10 BW (P=0.001) lower for the inside versus outside leg for the 17.2 and 36.5 m radius curves, respectively. For a given curve radius, vmax was 1.6% faster in the CCW compared with CW direction (P=0.003). Overall, we found that sprinters change contact length and modulate GRFs produced by their inside and outside legs as curve radius decreases, potentially limiting vmax.

Correction to: 'Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data' (2023) by Beck et al.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211799.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211799.].

Equivalent running leg lengths require prosthetic legs to be longer than biological legs during standing.

We aimed to determine a method for prescribing a standing prosthetic leg length (ProsL) that results in an equivalent running biological leg length (BioL) for athletes with unilateral (UTTA) and bilateral transtibial amputations (BTTA). We measured standing leg length of ten non-amputee (NA) athletes, ten athletes with UTTA, and five athletes with BTTA. All athletes performed treadmill running trials from 3 m/s to their maximum speed. We calculated standing and running BioL and ProsL lengths and assessed the running-to-standing leg length ratio (Lratio) at three instances during ground contact: touchdown, mid-stance, and take-off. Athletes with UTTA had 2.4 cm longer standing ProsL than BioL length (p = 0.030), but their ProsL length were up to 3.3 cm shorter at touchdown and 4.1 cm shorter at mid-stance than BioL, at speed 3-11.5 m/s. At touchdown, mid-stance, and take-off, athletes with BTTA had 0.01-0.05 lower Lratio at 3 m/s (p < 0.001) and 0.03-0.07 lower Lratio at 10 m/s (p < 0.001) in their ProsL compared to the BioL of NA athletes. During running, ProsL were consistently shorter than BioL. To achieve equivalent running leg lengths at touchdown and take-off, athletes with UTTA should set their running-specific prosthesis height so that their standing ProsL length is 2.8-4.5% longer than their BioL length, and athletes with BTTA should set their running-specific prosthesis height so that their standing ProsL lengths are at least 2.1-3.9% longer than their presumed BioL length. Setting ProsL length to match presumed biological dimensions during standing results in shorter legs during running.

Effects of powered versus passive-elastic ankle foot prostheses on leg muscle activity during level, uphill and downhill walking.

People with transtibial amputation (TTA) using passive-elastic prostheses have greater leg muscle activity and metabolic cost during level-ground and sloped walking than non-amputees. Use of a stance-phase powered (BiOM) versus passive-elastic prosthesis reduces metabolic cost for people with TTA during level-ground, +3° and +6° walking. Metabolic cost is associated with muscle activity, which may provide insight into differences between prostheses. We measured affected leg (AL) and unaffected leg (UL) muscle activity from ten people with TTA (6 males, 4 females) walking at 1.25 m s-1 on a dual-belt force-measuring treadmill at 0°, ±3°, ±6° and ±9° using their own passive-elastic and the BiOM prosthesis. We compared stride average integrated EMG (iEMG), peak EMG and muscle activity burst duration. Use of the BiOM increased UL lateral gastrocnemius iEMG on downhill slopes and AL biceps femoris on +6° and +9° slopes, and decreased UL rectus femoris on uphill slopes, UL vastus lateralis on +6° and +9°, and soleus and tibialis anterior on a +9° slope compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. Differences in leg muscle activity for people with TTA using a passive-elastic versus stance-phase powered prosthesis do not clearly explain differences in metabolic cost during walking on level ground and slopes.

Characterizing the Mechanical Stiffness of Passive-Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Struts.

People with lower limb impairment can participate in activities such as running with the use of a passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PD-AFO). Specifically, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is a PD-AFO design that includes a carbon-fiber strut, which attaches posteriorly to a custom-fabricated tibial cuff and foot plate and acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle joint to control sagittal and mediolateral motion, while allowing elastic energy storage and return during the stance phase of running. The strut stiffness affects the extent to which the orthosis keeps the impaired biological ankle in a neutral position by controling sagittal and mediolateral motion. The struts are currently manufactured to a thickness that corresponds with one of five stiffness categories (1 = least stiff, 5 = most stiff) and are prescribed to patients based on their body mass and activity level. However, the stiffness values of IDEO carbon-fiber struts have not been systematically determined, and these values can inform dynamic function and biomimetic PD-AFO prescription and design. The PD-AFO strut primarily deflects in the anterior direction (ankle dorsiflexion), and resists deflection in the posterior direction (ankle plantarflexion) during the stance phase of running. Thus, we constructed a custom apparatus and measured strut stiffness for 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection and 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection. We measured the applied moment and strut deflection to compute angular stiffness, the quotient of moment and angle. The strut moment-angle curves for anterior and posterior deflection were well characterized by a linear relationship. The strut stiffness values for categories 1-5 at 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection were 0.73-1.74 kN·m/rad and at 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection were 0.86-2.73 kN·m/rad. Since a PD-AFO strut acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle, the strut and impaired biological ankle angular stiffness sum to equal total stiffness. Thus, strut stiffness directly affects total ankle joint stiffness, which in turn affects ankle motion and energy storage and return during running. Future research is planned to better understand how use of a running-specific PD-AFO with different strut stiffness affects the biomechanics and metabolic costs of running in people with lower limb impairment.

Evaluating the 'cost of generating force' hypothesis across frequency in human running and hopping.

The volume of active muscle and duration of extensor muscle force well explain the associated metabolic energy expenditure across body mass and velocity during level-ground running and hopping. However, if these parameters fundamentally drive metabolic energy expenditure, then they should pertain to multiple modes of locomotion and provide a simple framework for relating biomechanics to metabolic energy expenditure in bouncing gaits. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of the 'cost of generating force' hypothesis to link biomechanics and metabolic energy expenditure during human running and hopping across step frequencies. We asked participants to run and hop at 85%, 92%, 100%, 108% and 115% of preferred running step frequency. We calculated changes in active muscle volume, duration of force production and metabolic energy expenditure. Overall, as step frequency increased, active muscle volume decreased as a result of postural changes via effective mechanical advantage (EMA) or duty factor. Accounting for changes in EMA and muscle volume better related to metabolic energy expenditure during running and hopping at different step frequencies than assuming a constant EMA and muscle volume. Thus, to ultimately develop muscle mechanics models that can explain metabolic energy expenditure across different modes of locomotion, we suggest more precise measures of muscle force production that include the effects of EMA.

Running-specific prosthesis model, stiffness and height affect biomechanics and asymmetry of athletes with unilateral leg amputations across speeds.

Athletes with transtibial amputation (TTA) use running-specific prostheses (RSPs) to run. RSP configuration likely affects the biomechanics of such athletes across speeds. We determined how the use of three RSP models (Catapult, Sprinter and Xtend) with three stiffness categories (recommended, ±1), and three heights (recommended, ±2 cm) affected contact length (Lc ), stance average vertical ground reaction force (F avg), step frequency (f step) and asymmetry between legs for 10 athletes with unilateral TTA at 3-7 m s-1. The use of the Xtend versus Catapult RSP decreased Lc (p = 2.69 × 10-7) and F avg asymmetry (p = 0.032); the effect on Lc asymmetry diminished with faster speeds (p = 0.0020). The use of the Sprinter versus Catapult RSP decreased F avg asymmetry (p = 7.00 × 10-5); this effect was independent of speed (p = 0.90). The use of a stiffer RSP decreased Lc asymmetry (p ≤ 0.00033); this effect was independent of speed (p ≥ 0.071). The use of a shorter RSP decreased Lc (p = 5.86 × 10-6), F avg (p = 8.58 × 10-6) and f step asymmetry (p = 0.0011); each effect was independent of speed (p ≥ 0.15). To minimize asymmetry, athletes with unilateral TTA should use an Xtend or Sprinter RSP with 2 cm shorter than recommended height and stiffness based on intended speed.

Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: a recurrent neural network solution.

BACKGROUND: Ground reaction forces (GRFs) are important for understanding human movement, but their measurement is generally limited to a laboratory environment. Previous studies have used neural networks to predict GRF waveforms during running from wearable device data, but these predictions are limited to the stance phase of level-ground running. A method of predicting the normal (perpendicular to running surface) GRF waveform using wearable devices across a range of running speeds and slopes could allow researchers and clinicians to predict kinetic and kinematic variables outside the laboratory environment. PURPOSE: We sought to develop a recurrent neural network capable of predicting continuous normal (perpendicular to surface) GRFs across a range of running speeds and slopes from accelerometer data. METHODS: Nineteen subjects ran on a force-measuring treadmill at five slopes (0°, ±5°, ±10°) and three speeds (2.5, 3.33, 4.17 m/s) per slope with sacral- and shoe-mounted accelerometers. We then trained a recurrent neural network to predict normal GRF waveforms frame-by-frame. The predicted versus measured GRF waveforms had an average ± SD RMSE of 0.16 ± 0.04 BW and relative RMSE of 6.4 ± 1.5% across all conditions and subjects. RESULTS: The recurrent neural network predicted continuous normal GRF waveforms across a range of running speeds and slopes with greater accuracy than neural networks implemented in previous studies. This approach may facilitate predictions of biomechanical variables outside the laboratory in near real-time and improves the accuracy of quantifying and monitoring external forces experienced by the body when running.

Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data.

Running-prostheses have enabled exceptional athletes with bilateral leg amputations to surpass Olympic 400 m athletics qualifying standards. Due to the world-class performances and relatively fast race finishes of these athletes, many people assume that running-prostheses provide users an unfair advantage over biologically legged competitors during long sprint races. These assumptions have led athletics governing bodies to prohibit the use of running-prostheses in sanctioned non-amputee (NA) competitions, such as at the Olympics. However, here we show that no athlete with bilateral leg amputations using running-prostheses, including the fastest such athlete, exhibits a single 400 m running performance metric that is better than those achieved by NA athletes. Specifically, the best experimentally measured maximum running velocity and sprint endurance profile of athletes with prosthetic legs are similar to, but not better than those of NA athletes. Further, the best experimentally measured initial race acceleration (from 0 to 20 m), maximum velocity around curves, and velocity at aerobic capacity of athletes with prosthetic legs were 40%, 1-3% and 19% slower compared to NA athletes, respectively. Therefore, based on these 400 m performance metrics, use of prosthetic legs during 400 m running races is not unequivocally advantageous compared to the use of biological legs.

Sacral acceleration can predict whole-body kinetics and stride kinematics across running speeds.

BACKGROUND: Stress fractures are injuries caused by repetitive loading during activities such as running. The application of advanced analytical methods such as machine learning to data from multiple wearable sensors has allowed for predictions of biomechanical variables associated with running-related injuries like stress fractures. However, it is unclear if data from a single wearable sensor can accurately estimate variables that characterize external loading during running such as peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), vertical impulse, and ground contact time. Predicting these biomechanical variables with a single wearable sensor could allow researchers, clinicians, and coaches to longitudinally monitor biomechanical running-related injury risk factors without expensive force-measuring equipment. PURPOSE: We quantified the accuracy of applying quantile regression forest (QRF) and linear regression (LR) models to sacral-mounted accelerometer data to predict peak vGRF, vertical impulse, and ground contact time across a range of running speeds. METHODS: Thirty-seven collegiate cross country runners (24 females, 13 males) ran on a force-measuring treadmill at 3.8-5.4 m/s while wearing an accelerometer clipped posteriorly to the waistband of their running shorts. We cross-validated QRF and LR models by training them on acceleration data, running speed, step frequency, and body mass as predictor variables. Trained models were then used to predict peak vGRF, vertical impulse, and contact time. We compared predicted values to those calculated from a force-measuring treadmill on a subset of data (n = 9) withheld during model training. We quantified prediction accuracy by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). RESULTS: The QRF model predicted peak vGRF with a RMSE of 0.150 body weights (BW) and MAPE of 4.27  ±  2.85%, predicted vertical impulse with a RMSE of 0.004 BW*s and MAPE of 0.80  ±  0.91%, and predicted contact time with a RMSE of 0.011 s and MAPE of 4.68  ±  3.00%. The LR model predicted peak vGRF with a RMSE of 0.139 BW and MAPE of 4.04  ±  2.57%, predicted vertical impulse with a RMSE of 0.002 BW*s and MAPE of 0.50  ±  0.42%, and predicted contact time with a RMSE of 0.008 s and MAPE of 3.50  ±  2.27%. There were no statistically significant differences between QRF and LR model prediction MAPE for peak vGRF (p = 0.549) or vertical impulse (p = 0.073), but the LR model's MAPE for contact time was significantly lower than the QRF model's MAPE (p = 0.0497). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the QRF and LR models can accurately predict peak vGRF, vertical impulse, and contact time (MAPE < 5%) from a single sacral-mounted accelerometer across a range of running speeds. These findings may be beneficial for researchers, clinicians, or coaches seeking to monitor running-related injury risk factors without force-measuring equipment.

Low-pass filter cutoff frequency affects sacral-mounted inertial measurement unit estimations of peak vertical ground reaction force and contact time during treadmill running.

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are popular tools for estimating biomechanical variables such as peak vertical ground reaction force (GRFv) and foot-ground contact time (tc), often by using multiple sensors or predictive models. Despite their growing use, little is known about the effects of varying low-pass filter cutoff frequency, which can affect the magnitude of force-related dependent variables, the accuracy of IMU-derived metrics, or if simpler methods for such estimations exist. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of varying low-pass filter cutoff frequency on the correlation of IMU-derived peak GRFv and tc to gold-standard lab-based measurements. Thirty National Collegiate Athletics Association Division 1 cross country runners ran on an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds while outfitted with a sacral-mounted IMU. A simple method for estimating peak GRFv from the IMU was implemented by multiplying the IMU's vertical acceleration by the runner's body mass. Data from the IMU were low-pass filtered with 5, 10, and 30 Hz cutoffs. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine how well the IMU-derived estimates matched gold-standard biomechanical estimations. Correlations ranged from very weak to moderate for peak GRFv and tc. For peak GRFv, the 10 Hz low-pass filter cutoff performed best (r = 0.638), while for tc the 5 Hz cut-off performed best (r = 0.656). These results suggest that IMU-derived estimates of force and contact time are influenced by the low-pass filter cutoff frequency. Further investigations are needed to determine the optimal low-pass filter cutoff frequency or a different method to accurately estimate force and contact time is suggested.

Muscle Eccentric Contractions Increase in Downhill and High-Grade Uphill Walking.

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), one of the most severe and frequent genetic diseases in humans, dystrophic muscles are prone to damage caused by mechanical stresses during eccentric contractions. Eccentric contraction during walking on level ground likely contributes to the progression of degeneration in lower limb muscles. However, little is known about how the amount of muscle eccentric contractions is affected by uphill/downhill sloped walking, which is often encountered in patients' daily lives and poses different biomechanical demands than level walking. By recreating the dynamic musculoskeletal simulations of downhill (-9°, -6°, and -3°), uphill (+3°, +6°, and +9°) and level walking (0°) from a published study of healthy participants, negative muscle mechanical work, as a measure of eccentric contraction, of 35 lower limb muscles was quantified and compared. Our results indicated that downhill walking overall induced more (32% at -9°, 19% at -6°, and 13% at -3°) eccentric contractions in lower limb muscles compared to level walking. In contrast, uphill walking led to eccentric contractions similar to level walking at low grades (+3° and +6°), but 17% more eccentric contraction at high grades (+9°). The changes of muscle eccentric contraction were largely predicted by the changes in both joint negative work and muscle coactivation in sloped walking. As muscle eccentric contractions play a critical role in the disease progression in DMD, this study provides an important baseline for future studies to safely improve rehabilitation strategies and exercise management for patients with DMD and other similar conditions.

Passive-elastic knee-ankle exoskeleton reduces the metabolic cost of walking.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that passive-elastic exoskeletons with springs in parallel with the ankle can reduce the metabolic cost of walking. We developed and tested the use of an unpowered passive-elastic exoskeleton for walking that stores elastic energy in a spring from knee extension at the end of the leg swing phase, and then releases this energy to assist ankle plantarflexion at the end of the stance phase prior to toe-off. The exoskeleton uses a system of ratchets and pawls to store and return elastic energy through compression and release of metal springs that act in parallel with the knee and ankle, respectively. We hypothesized that, due to the assistance provided by the exoskeleton, net metabolic power would be reduced compared to walking without using an exoskeleton. METHODS: We compared the net metabolic power required to walk when the exoskeleton only acts at the knee to resist extension at the end of the leg swing phase, to that required to walk when the stored elastic energy from knee extension is released to assist ankle plantarflexion at the end of the stance phase prior to toe-off. Eight (4 M, 4F) subjects walked at 1.25 m/s on a force-measuring treadmill with and without using the exoskeleton while we measured their metabolic rates, ground reaction forces, and center of pressure. RESULTS: We found that when subjects used the exoskeleton with energy stored from knee extension and released for ankle plantarflexion, average net metabolic power was 11% lower than when subjects walked while wearing the exoskeleton with the springs disengaged (p = 0.007), but was 23% higher compared to walking without the exoskeleton (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of a novel passive-elastic exoskeleton that stores and returns energy in parallel with the knee and ankle, respectively, has the potential to improve the metabolic cost of walking. Future studies are needed to optimize the design and elucidate the underlying biomechanical and physiological effects of using an exoskeleton that acts in parallel with the knee and ankle. Moreover, addressing and improving the exoskeletal design by reducing and closely aligning the mass of the exoskeleton could further improve the metabolic cost of walking.