Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(11): 1329-1334, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061201

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the role healthcare providers play in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) acquisition among hospitalized patients. DESIGN A 1:4 case-control study with incidence density sampling. SETTING Academic healthcare center with regular CRE perirectal screening in high-risk units. PATIENTS We included case patients with ≥1 negative CRE test followed by positive culture with a length of stay (LOS) >9 days. For controls, we included patients with ≥2 negative CRE tests and assignment to the same unit set as case patients with a LOS >9 days. METHODS Controls were time-matched to each case patient. Case exposure was evaluated between days 2 and 9 before positive culture and control evaluation was based on maximizing overlap with the case window. Exposure sources were all CRE-colonized or -infected patients. Nonphysician providers were compared between study patients and sources during their evaluation windows. Dichotomous and continuous exposures were developed from the number of source-shared providers and were used in univariate and multivariate regression. RESULTS In total, 121 cases and 484 controls were included. Multivariate analysis showed odds of dichotomous exposure (≥1 source-shared provider) of 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-4.15; P=.006) for case patients compared to controls. Multivariate continuous exposure showed odds of 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P=.009) for case patients compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS Patients who acquire CRE during hospitalization are more likely to receive care from a provider caring for a patient with CRE than those patients who do not acquire CRE. These data support the importance of hand hygiene and cohorting measures for CRE patients to reduce transmission risk. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1329-1334.


Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Cross Infection/transmission , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/etiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
J Drug Target ; 23(7-8): 750-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26453170

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nanoparticles with controlled physical properties have been widely used for controlled release applications. In addition to shape, the anisotropic nature of the particles can be an important design criterion to ensure selective surface modification or independent release of combinations of drugs. PURPOSE: Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) co-jetting is used for the fabrication of uniform anisotropic nanoparticles with individual compartments and initial physicochemical and biological characterization is reported. METHODS: EHD co-jetting is used to create nanoparticles, which are characterized at each stage with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), structured illumination microscopy (SIM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Surface immobilization techniques are used to incorporate polyethylene glycol (PEG) and I(125) radiolabels into the nanoparticles. Particles are injected in mice and the particle distribution after 1, 4 and 24 hours is assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nanoparticles with an average diameter of 105.7 nm are prepared by EHD co-jetting. The particles contain functional chemical groups for further surface modification and radiolabeling. The density of PEG molecules attached to the surface of nanoparticles is determined to range between 0.02 and 6.04 ligands per square nanometer. A significant fraction of the nanoparticles (1.2% injected dose per mass of organ) circulates in the blood after 24 h. CONCLUSION: EHD co-jetting is a versatile method for the fabrication of nanoparticles for drug delivery. Circulation of the nanoparticles for 24 h is a pre-requisite for subsequent studies to explore defined targeting of the nanoparticles to a specific anatomic site.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymers/chemistry , Animals , Anisotropy , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dynamic Light Scattering , Hydrodynamics , Iodine Radioisotopes , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Particle Size , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Time Factors , Tissue Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...