Exacerbation of psoriatic skin lesions in a patient with psoriatic arthritis receiving adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving adalimumab, who developed an exacerbation of palmoplantaris pustulosa psoriasis. CASE SUMMARY: A 38-year-old woman diagnosed with PsA had received treatment with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Two months prior to admission, the patient had a Disease Activity Score of 3.8; diclofenac therapy was suspended and physicians considered treatment with adalimumab. Chest X-rays were normal and the tuberculin skin test was negative. Treatment with adalimumab was started. After the third dose of adalimumab, the patient developed an exacerbation of psoriatic skin lesions on palms and soles. The clinical course was consistent with an exacerbation of palmoplantaris pustulosa psoriasis. Adalimumab treatment was suspended. The patient was treated with oral methotrexate 2.5 mg once weekly. One month after methrotexate was started, the patient developed a severe alopecia. Methrotexate therapy was suspended. Three months later, the patient continued with psoriatic skin lesions on palms and soles. Treatment with Psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy was initiated and the patient condition improved without occurrence of psoriatic skin lesions in the next 4 months. DISCUSSION: Cases of worsening or exacerbation of psoriatic skin lesions induced by anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents in patients diagnosed PsA are infrequently described in the literature. The most likely cause of the exacerbation of palmoplantaris pustulosa psoriasis in this case was considered to be adalimumab because of the close temporal relationship between exposure to the drug and onset of symptoms. Adalimumab was the only identifiable precipitant that the patient encountered before the exacerbation of psoriasis developed. In accordance with the data obtained and based on the Naranjo algorithm, the adverse reaction could be considered probable. CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiated on adalimumab therapy should be closely monitored for the development of exacerbation of psoriasis. Clinicians should be aware of this rare adverse effect of this anti-TNF drug.

Septic shock and community-acquired pneumonia associated with etanercept therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of septic shock and community-acquired pneumonia in a patient with psoriatic arthritis receiving treatment with etanercept. PATIENT DETAILS: A 65-year-old woman diagnosed as having psoriatic arthritis had received treatment with etanercept. Chest X-ray studies were normal and the tuberculin skin test was negative. Two months after etanercept therapy, the patient presented to our emergency department with fever, cough, chest pain and generalized weakness. Chest radiography revealed a right pulmonary infiltrate. Her condition rapidly deteriorated and she went into shock with a further drop in her blood pressure, tachycardia and tachypnea. She was intubated, mechanically ventilated and was treated with fluids, cardioversion and amiodarone. Empiric therapy with levofloxacin, amikacin and cefepime were initiated. In the urinalysis, the result of a rapid test for Streptococcus pneumoniae was positive. Etanercept treatment was suspended due to a possible adverse reaction associated with this drug. At the start of therapy her clinical condition improved slowly. On Day 28, the patient was afebrile and she was discharged from the intensive care unit. DISCUSSION: Most of the infections associated with etanercept therapy have been reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Based on our observations, etanercept was the possible offender in the development of septic shock and respiratory failure in community-acquired pneumonia. There was a temporal relationship between exposure to the drug and onset of symptoms. Etanercept was the only drug administered before the septic shock developed. Based on the Naranjo algorithm, the adverse reaction could be considered possible. CONCLUSION: Patients initiated on etanercept should be counseled and receive appropriate screening before drug initiation. All febrile and newly occurring concomitant illnesses should be promptly evaluated. General practitioners should discontinue etanercept treatment and institute prompt and aggressive intervention if infection develops.

Análisis del estado actual de la rehabilitación y medicina física en la Comunidad Autónoma Valenciana / Analysis of the present status of rehabilitation and physical medicine in the valencian regional community

Introducción: Muchas veces tenemos dificultad para satisfacer las necesidades terapéuticas de nuestros pacientes. Con objeto de identificar las causas del problema, analizamos la adecuación entre objetivos y medios, evaluando los recursos humanos disponibles.Material y método: Analizamos tres aspectos de nuestra especialidad: la situación ideal, la situación real y la imagen proyectada o percibida. De la definición de Rehabilitación deducimos la situación ideal y la relación óptima objetivos/medios. Del análisis de algunas fuentes de información institucionales, determinamos la situación real. En base a nuestra experiencia personal, algunas noticias de prensa y otras publicaciones analizamos la imagen percibida sobre nuestra especialidad.Resultados y discusión: Lo 'ideal' sería disponer de un equipo multiprofesional/interdisciplinar. La realidad es que contamos con un equipo profesional demasiado básico, capaz de atender los problemas subsidiarios de 'Medicina Física', pero con carencias para tratar discapacidades múltiples o complejas. La causa del problema es estructural (carencia de recursos) y funcional (inadecuada utilización); al no haber reconocimiento oficial la gravedad es mayor. La imagen que otros profesionales perciben de nuestra especialidad no es adecuada; esto produce confusiones y podría ser motivo de problemas futuros.Conclusiones: Al carecer del equipo multiprofesional/interdisciplinar, tenemos una Rehabilitación 'bajo mínimos'.Esto genera una imagen confusa y distorsionada de nuestra especialidad y podría desencadenar diversos conflictos. Detectamos que la sociedad necesita y demanda las genuinas soluciones de la Rehabilitación, sin carencias de ningún tipo.Sería conveniente abrir un debate en el seno de nuestras sociedades científicas, para buscar soluciones a estos problemas (AU)