The osteoarthritis knee model: psychophysical characteristics and putative outcomes.

UNLABELLED: The knee osteoarthritis (KOA) model is a convenient and coherent archetype that is frequently used in pharmaceutical trials of drugs with analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory properties; yet, little is known about its specific pathophysiology. The presumed chronic inflammatory etiology of osteoarthritis suggests that nociceptive processes and neurogenic inflammation predominate in this condition. However, most chronic pain conditions are associated with changes in peripheral and central processing. Recent data corroborate this as an important mechanism in KOA. We compared psychophysical characteristics (including thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing); thermal, mechanical, and functional wind-up; thermal and mechanical aftersensations; and pressure algometry of 37 subjects with KOA with 35 age- and sex-matched controls. A third of the KOA subjects demonstrated hypoesthesia to vibration and the 4.56 von Frey fiber, yet few showed allodynia in their worse knee. The majority of subjects had abnormalities to pinprick (41% were hyperalgesic and 27% were hypoesthetic). Compared to controls, the more painful knee was hypoesthetic to cold detection and had greater thermal wind-up, lower pressure-pain thresholds, thermal and mechanical aftersensations, and twice the pain ratings of controls after stair climb. Substantial intraindividual differences were found in KOA subjects and controls for mechanical wind-up and algometric thresholds. PERSPECTIVE: These results develop the KOA model and suggest mechanistic hypotheses. Certain of these tests may ultimately prove to be responsive, quasi-objective, and quantitative outcomes for research and lend empirical support to the notion of measurable sensitization in osteoarthritis.

Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 4th edition.

OBJECTIVE: This is the fourth edition of diagnostic and treatment guidelines for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS; aka reflex sympathetic dystrophy). METHODS: Expert practitioners in each discipline traditionally utilized in the treatment of CRPS systematically reviewed the available and relevant literature; due to the paucity of levels 1 and 2 studies, less rigorous, preliminary research reports were included. The literature review was supplemented with knowledge gained from extensive empirical clinical experience, particularly in areas where high-quality evidence to guide therapy is lacking. RESULTS: The research quality, clinical relevance, and "state of the art" of diagnostic criteria or treatment modalities are discussed, sometimes in considerable detail with an eye to the expert practitioner in each therapeutic area. Levels of evidence are mentioned when available, so that the practitioner can better assess and analyze the modality under discussion, and if desired, to personally consider the citations. Tables provide details on characteristics of studies in different subject domains described in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: In the humanitarian spirit of making the most of all current thinking in the area, balanced by a careful case-by-case analysis of the risk/cost vs benefit analysis, the authors offer these "practical" guidelines.